老年LGBTQ +成人的“选择家庭”和原生家庭的独特特征:与心理健康有关吗?

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ella Cohn-Schwartz, Sigal Gooldin, Lian Meiry, Robert Heidemann, Yaacov G Bachner
{"title":"老年LGBTQ +成人的“选择家庭”和原生家庭的独特特征:与心理健康有关吗?","authors":"Ella Cohn-Schwartz, Sigal Gooldin, Lian Meiry, Robert Heidemann, Yaacov G Bachner","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02919-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study joins a growing body of research on the different types of families of aging individuals belonging to sexual and gender minorities. We explore the characteristics of \"families of choice\" (who are close enough to be considered as family) and families of origin of LGBTQ + older adults and their associations with mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were collected via an online survey with self-identified lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender, queer and others (LGBTQ +) adults aged 50 + (n = 432). Participants were asked about characteristics of the relationships with their families of choice and their families of origin, depressive symptoms and well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that most participants had a family of choice, numbering five people on average. They also reported having about four close family of origin members. Several differences emerged when comparing the two types of families: The relationships with families of origin were more stable, while families of choice were more committed, more likely to accept participants' sexual orientation and the relationship with members of families of choice had fewer negative aspects. Regression analyses showed that individuals had better mental health if they had more close family of origin members, more family of choice members and a partner, if the relationship with their families of choice were more stable and less negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings shed light on the unique sources of support among LGBTQ + older adults and their associations with mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The unique characteristics of \\\"families of choice\\\" and families of origin of older LGBTQ + adults: are they related to mental health?\",\"authors\":\"Ella Cohn-Schwartz, Sigal Gooldin, Lian Meiry, Robert Heidemann, Yaacov G Bachner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02919-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study joins a growing body of research on the different types of families of aging individuals belonging to sexual and gender minorities. We explore the characteristics of \\\"families of choice\\\" (who are close enough to be considered as family) and families of origin of LGBTQ + older adults and their associations with mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were collected via an online survey with self-identified lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender, queer and others (LGBTQ +) adults aged 50 + (n = 432). Participants were asked about characteristics of the relationships with their families of choice and their families of origin, depressive symptoms and well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that most participants had a family of choice, numbering five people on average. They also reported having about four close family of origin members. Several differences emerged when comparing the two types of families: The relationships with families of origin were more stable, while families of choice were more committed, more likely to accept participants' sexual orientation and the relationship with members of families of choice had fewer negative aspects. Regression analyses showed that individuals had better mental health if they had more close family of origin members, more family of choice members and a partner, if the relationship with their families of choice were more stable and less negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings shed light on the unique sources of support among LGBTQ + older adults and their associations with mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02919-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02919-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究加入了越来越多的关于属于性和性别少数群体的老年人不同类型家庭的研究。我们探讨了LGBTQ +老年人的“选择家庭”(足够亲密,可以被视为家庭)和原生家庭的特征及其与心理健康的关系。方法:本研究通过在线调查收集数据,调查对象为年龄在50岁以上、自认为是女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和其他(LGBTQ +)的成年人(n = 432)。参与者被问及与其选择的家庭和原生家庭的关系特点、抑郁症状和幸福感。结果:结果表明,大多数参与者都有一个家庭选择,平均有5人。他们还报告说,他们有大约四名近亲家庭成员。当比较两种类型的家庭时,出现了一些差异:与原生家庭的关系更稳定,而选择的家庭更忠诚,更有可能接受参与者的性取向,与选择的家庭成员的关系有更少的消极方面。回归分析表明,如果一个人有更多亲密的原生家庭成员、更多的选择家庭成员和一个伴侣,如果他与选择家庭的关系更稳定、负面情绪更少,那么他的心理健康状况就会更好。结论:这些发现揭示了LGBTQ +老年人独特的支持来源及其与心理健康的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The unique characteristics of "families of choice" and families of origin of older LGBTQ + adults: are they related to mental health?

Purpose: This study joins a growing body of research on the different types of families of aging individuals belonging to sexual and gender minorities. We explore the characteristics of "families of choice" (who are close enough to be considered as family) and families of origin of LGBTQ + older adults and their associations with mental health.

Methods: Data for this study were collected via an online survey with self-identified lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender, queer and others (LGBTQ +) adults aged 50 + (n = 432). Participants were asked about characteristics of the relationships with their families of choice and their families of origin, depressive symptoms and well-being.

Results: The results indicated that most participants had a family of choice, numbering five people on average. They also reported having about four close family of origin members. Several differences emerged when comparing the two types of families: The relationships with families of origin were more stable, while families of choice were more committed, more likely to accept participants' sexual orientation and the relationship with members of families of choice had fewer negative aspects. Regression analyses showed that individuals had better mental health if they had more close family of origin members, more family of choice members and a partner, if the relationship with their families of choice were more stable and less negative.

Conclusion: These findings shed light on the unique sources of support among LGBTQ + older adults and their associations with mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信