Yemisi O Jones, Kristen Timmons, Rebecca Kolb, Lisa E Herrmann, Laura Werts, Melissa Klein, Jennifer O'Toole
{"title":"课堂之外:教学式继续教育中面对面和虚拟主动学习技术的德尔菲研究。","authors":"Yemisi O Jones, Kristen Timmons, Rebecca Kolb, Lisa E Herrmann, Laura Werts, Melissa Klein, Jennifer O'Toole","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite evidence supporting active learning techniques to enhance learning, they are seldom used during large-group continuing education (CE) sessions. This project sought to describe which active learning techniques are acceptable, feasible, and with which learners are likely to engage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Active learning techniques derived from a literature review were rated for two rounds by two Delphi panels, one composed of medical education experts (n = 10) and the other of CE attendees (n = 12). Each technique received five ratings: experts rated appropriateness for use in large-group didactic CE and feasibility for in-person and virtual use, and attendees rated their likelihood to engage in-person and virtually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 30 active learning techniques, 13 (43%) received the highest ratings on all 5 measures. The remainder of the techniques did not achieve consensus on at least one measure. Only two techniques reached consensus for not being appropriate for large-group didactic CE.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We provide consensus evidence for the feasibility, appropriateness, and likelihood to engage for a variety of active learning techniques. This list can serve as a guide for their implementation in large-group didactic education and as a starting point for future study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Lecture: A Delphi Study of In-Person and Virtual Active Learning Techniques in Didactic Continuing Education.\",\"authors\":\"Yemisi O Jones, Kristen Timmons, Rebecca Kolb, Lisa E Herrmann, Laura Werts, Melissa Klein, Jennifer O'Toole\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite evidence supporting active learning techniques to enhance learning, they are seldom used during large-group continuing education (CE) sessions. This project sought to describe which active learning techniques are acceptable, feasible, and with which learners are likely to engage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Active learning techniques derived from a literature review were rated for two rounds by two Delphi panels, one composed of medical education experts (n = 10) and the other of CE attendees (n = 12). Each technique received five ratings: experts rated appropriateness for use in large-group didactic CE and feasibility for in-person and virtual use, and attendees rated their likelihood to engage in-person and virtually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 30 active learning techniques, 13 (43%) received the highest ratings on all 5 measures. The remainder of the techniques did not achieve consensus on at least one measure. Only two techniques reached consensus for not being appropriate for large-group didactic CE.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We provide consensus evidence for the feasibility, appropriateness, and likelihood to engage for a variety of active learning techniques. This list can serve as a guide for their implementation in large-group didactic education and as a starting point for future study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000607\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond the Lecture: A Delphi Study of In-Person and Virtual Active Learning Techniques in Didactic Continuing Education.
Introduction: Despite evidence supporting active learning techniques to enhance learning, they are seldom used during large-group continuing education (CE) sessions. This project sought to describe which active learning techniques are acceptable, feasible, and with which learners are likely to engage.
Methods: Active learning techniques derived from a literature review were rated for two rounds by two Delphi panels, one composed of medical education experts (n = 10) and the other of CE attendees (n = 12). Each technique received five ratings: experts rated appropriateness for use in large-group didactic CE and feasibility for in-person and virtual use, and attendees rated their likelihood to engage in-person and virtually.
Results: Out of 30 active learning techniques, 13 (43%) received the highest ratings on all 5 measures. The remainder of the techniques did not achieve consensus on at least one measure. Only two techniques reached consensus for not being appropriate for large-group didactic CE.
Discussion: We provide consensus evidence for the feasibility, appropriateness, and likelihood to engage for a variety of active learning techniques. This list can serve as a guide for their implementation in large-group didactic education and as a starting point for future study.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.