Bong Suk Park , Dae Joon Kim , Chang Young Lee , Byung Jo Park , Ha Eun Kim , Young Ho Yang , Moo Suk Park , Song Yee Kim , A La Woo , Eun Young Kim , Jin Gu Lee
{"title":"供体/受体大小不匹配肺移植的结果。","authors":"Bong Suk Park , Dae Joon Kim , Chang Young Lee , Byung Jo Park , Ha Eun Kim , Young Ho Yang , Moo Suk Park , Song Yee Kim , A La Woo , Eun Young Kim , Jin Gu Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Donor/recipient (D/R) size matching is crucial to achieve proper organ allocation and outcome for lung transplantation (LT). However, studies in this regard have not shown consistent results. We analyzed the results of size-mismatched LT focusing on primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 446 patients underwent LT between January 2010 and December 2022. After exclusion, the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the donor/recipient size; D/R ratio >120% was grouped as Over (n = 87), 120%≥D/R ratio≥80% was grouped as Normal (n = 271), 80%>D/R was grouped as Under (n = 19). Early and long-term outcomes were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Recipient height, weight, and proportion of male were the highest in the Under group, followed by the Normal and Over groups (<em>P</em> < 0.001). The ratio of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning in the operating room was highest in the Under group, followed by the Normal and Over groups (<em>P</em> : 0.04). The proportions of PGD grade 3 within 48 h and 72 h were highest in the Over group, followed by the Normal and Under groups (<em>P :</em> 0.007 and 0.016, respectively). There was no statistical difference in the pulmonary function test results between the groups at 12 months postoperative follow-up. The 5-year survival rate did not differ among the groups (60.9% vs 56.8% vs 54.7%, Under vs Normal vs Over, <em>P :</em> 0.833)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although oversized D/R-matched LT demonstrated late recovery during the early postoperative period, their long-term results were non-inferior in terms of the D/R size ratio.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 5","pages":"Pages 868-875"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Donor/Recipient Size-mismatched Lung Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Bong Suk Park , Dae Joon Kim , Chang Young Lee , Byung Jo Park , Ha Eun Kim , Young Ho Yang , Moo Suk Park , Song Yee Kim , A La Woo , Eun Young Kim , Jin Gu Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Donor/recipient (D/R) size matching is crucial to achieve proper organ allocation and outcome for lung transplantation (LT). However, studies in this regard have not shown consistent results. We analyzed the results of size-mismatched LT focusing on primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 446 patients underwent LT between January 2010 and December 2022. After exclusion, the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the donor/recipient size; D/R ratio >120% was grouped as Over (n = 87), 120%≥D/R ratio≥80% was grouped as Normal (n = 271), 80%>D/R was grouped as Under (n = 19). Early and long-term outcomes were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Recipient height, weight, and proportion of male were the highest in the Under group, followed by the Normal and Over groups (<em>P</em> < 0.001). The ratio of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning in the operating room was highest in the Under group, followed by the Normal and Over groups (<em>P</em> : 0.04). The proportions of PGD grade 3 within 48 h and 72 h were highest in the Over group, followed by the Normal and Under groups (<em>P :</em> 0.007 and 0.016, respectively). There was no statistical difference in the pulmonary function test results between the groups at 12 months postoperative follow-up. The 5-year survival rate did not differ among the groups (60.9% vs 56.8% vs 54.7%, Under vs Normal vs Over, <em>P :</em> 0.833)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although oversized D/R-matched LT demonstrated late recovery during the early postoperative period, their long-term results were non-inferior in terms of the D/R size ratio.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 868-875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002283\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:供体/受体(D/R)大小匹配对于实现合适的器官分配和肺移植(LT)的预后至关重要。然而,这方面的研究并没有得出一致的结果。我们分析了大小不匹配的LT的结果,重点是原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)和生存率。方法:2010年1月至2022年12月,共446例患者接受了肝移植。排除后,按供体/受体大小分为3组;D/R比>≥120%组为超过组(n = 87),≥120%组为正常组(n = 271),≥80% >组为低于组(n = 19)。分析了早期和长期结果。结果:受者身高、体重、男性比例以Under组最高,Normal组次之,Over组次之(P < 0.001)。手术室内体外膜氧合脱机率以Under组最高,其次为Normal组和Over组(P: 0.04)。48 h和72 h内3级PGD比例以Over组最高,其次为Normal组和Under组(P值分别为0.007和0.016)。术后随访12个月,两组肺功能检查结果比较,差异无统计学意义。5年生存率各组间无差异(60.9% vs 56.8% vs 54.7%, Under vs Normal vs Over, P: 0.833)结论:尽管超大D/R匹配的LT在术后早期表现出较晚的恢复,但其长期结果在D/R大小比方面并不差。
Outcomes of Donor/Recipient Size-mismatched Lung Transplantation
Background
Donor/recipient (D/R) size matching is crucial to achieve proper organ allocation and outcome for lung transplantation (LT). However, studies in this regard have not shown consistent results. We analyzed the results of size-mismatched LT focusing on primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and survival.
Methods
A total of 446 patients underwent LT between January 2010 and December 2022. After exclusion, the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the donor/recipient size; D/R ratio >120% was grouped as Over (n = 87), 120%≥D/R ratio≥80% was grouped as Normal (n = 271), 80%>D/R was grouped as Under (n = 19). Early and long-term outcomes were analyzed.
Results
Recipient height, weight, and proportion of male were the highest in the Under group, followed by the Normal and Over groups (P < 0.001). The ratio of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning in the operating room was highest in the Under group, followed by the Normal and Over groups (P : 0.04). The proportions of PGD grade 3 within 48 h and 72 h were highest in the Over group, followed by the Normal and Under groups (P : 0.007 and 0.016, respectively). There was no statistical difference in the pulmonary function test results between the groups at 12 months postoperative follow-up. The 5-year survival rate did not differ among the groups (60.9% vs 56.8% vs 54.7%, Under vs Normal vs Over, P : 0.833)
Conclusions
Although oversized D/R-matched LT demonstrated late recovery during the early postoperative period, their long-term results were non-inferior in terms of the D/R size ratio.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.