Chandima Divithotawela , Shawn Z. Lee , Michael Schulz , Daniel C. Chambers
{"title":"肺和骨髓移植患者Epstein Barr病毒定量聚合酶链反应监测预测移植后淋巴增生性疾病:系统综述","authors":"Chandima Divithotawela , Shawn Z. Lee , Michael Schulz , Daniel C. Chambers","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) affects up to 10% of lung transplant patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early identification of patients at risk of PTLD and reduction in immunosuppression may be an effective way to prevent future diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted of all bone marrow (BMT/HSCT) and lung transplant studies published in English that assessed quantitative peripheral blood EBV PCR monitoring as a predictive measure of future PTLD occurrence. Studies on pre-emptive therapy before the diagnosis of PTLD were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A thousand of hundred sixty-three studies were screened, and 12 were eligible for the final analysis. The two lung transplant studies reported 60% to 80% sensitivity (SN) and 60% to 86% negative predictive value (NPV), but poor specificity (SP) (30%-75%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (30%-67%). HSCT studies also showed good SN (71.4%-100%) and NPV (94%-100%). However, the SP (range, 50%-96%) and PPV (range, 14%-75%) were poor. The included studies used nonstandardized EBV PCR testing methods, which affected the validity of the results and the applicability of the findings to other transplant programs. Most studies were retrospective and included a small number of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, this systematic review demonstrated the lack of good-quality evidence and poor SP and PPV of EBV PCR monitoring to predict PTLD development in lung transplantation. The use of PCR-guided preemptive therapy for future PTLD prevention is questionable. Further studies with standardized EBV PCR measurements are required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 5","pages":"Pages 931-939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epstein Barr Virus Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Monitoring in Lung and Bone Marrow Transplant Patients to Predict Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Chandima Divithotawela , Shawn Z. Lee , Michael Schulz , Daniel C. Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) affects up to 10% of lung transplant patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early identification of patients at risk of PTLD and reduction in immunosuppression may be an effective way to prevent future diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted of all bone marrow (BMT/HSCT) and lung transplant studies published in English that assessed quantitative peripheral blood EBV PCR monitoring as a predictive measure of future PTLD occurrence. Studies on pre-emptive therapy before the diagnosis of PTLD were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A thousand of hundred sixty-three studies were screened, and 12 were eligible for the final analysis. The two lung transplant studies reported 60% to 80% sensitivity (SN) and 60% to 86% negative predictive value (NPV), but poor specificity (SP) (30%-75%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (30%-67%). HSCT studies also showed good SN (71.4%-100%) and NPV (94%-100%). However, the SP (range, 50%-96%) and PPV (range, 14%-75%) were poor. The included studies used nonstandardized EBV PCR testing methods, which affected the validity of the results and the applicability of the findings to other transplant programs. Most studies were retrospective and included a small number of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, this systematic review demonstrated the lack of good-quality evidence and poor SP and PPV of EBV PCR monitoring to predict PTLD development in lung transplantation. The use of PCR-guided preemptive therapy for future PTLD prevention is questionable. Further studies with standardized EBV PCR measurements are required.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 931-939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Epstein Barr Virus Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Monitoring in Lung and Bone Marrow Transplant Patients to Predict Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder: A Systematic Review
Background
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-driven post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) affects up to 10% of lung transplant patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early identification of patients at risk of PTLD and reduction in immunosuppression may be an effective way to prevent future diseases.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted of all bone marrow (BMT/HSCT) and lung transplant studies published in English that assessed quantitative peripheral blood EBV PCR monitoring as a predictive measure of future PTLD occurrence. Studies on pre-emptive therapy before the diagnosis of PTLD were excluded.
Results
A thousand of hundred sixty-three studies were screened, and 12 were eligible for the final analysis. The two lung transplant studies reported 60% to 80% sensitivity (SN) and 60% to 86% negative predictive value (NPV), but poor specificity (SP) (30%-75%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (30%-67%). HSCT studies also showed good SN (71.4%-100%) and NPV (94%-100%). However, the SP (range, 50%-96%) and PPV (range, 14%-75%) were poor. The included studies used nonstandardized EBV PCR testing methods, which affected the validity of the results and the applicability of the findings to other transplant programs. Most studies were retrospective and included a small number of cases.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this systematic review demonstrated the lack of good-quality evidence and poor SP and PPV of EBV PCR monitoring to predict PTLD development in lung transplantation. The use of PCR-guided preemptive therapy for future PTLD prevention is questionable. Further studies with standardized EBV PCR measurements are required.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.