子宫注射部位对盆腔前哨淋巴结定位有影响吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pier Carlo Zorzato, Simone Garzon, Mariachiara Bosco, Filippo Ferrari, Francesca Magni, Rosa Maria Laterza, Antonio Simone Laganà, Francesco Fanfani, Stefano Uccella
{"title":"子宫注射部位对盆腔前哨淋巴结定位有影响吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Pier Carlo Zorzato, Simone Garzon, Mariachiara Bosco, Filippo Ferrari, Francesca Magni, Rosa Maria Laterza, Antonio Simone Laganà, Francesco Fanfani, Stefano Uccella","doi":"10.3390/medicina61040699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: To summarize the evidence on in vivo uterine pelvic lymphatic drainage. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A literature search was performed in multiple electronic databases from inception to December 2024. We included all the studies that compared two different uterine injection sites in the mapping of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes by injecting two different tracers into two distinct injection sites. The primary outcomes included the concordance and discordance rates in the mapped pelvic sentinel lymph nodes between the pairs of injection sites. The secondary outcomes were the detection rates per injection site and tracer. Four reviewers independently reviewed the records for inclusion, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. Pooled concordance, discordance, and detection rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the random effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> tests. <i>Results</i>: Out of 2512 records, we included 4 studies (172 patients and 344 hemipelves). Three studies injected the cervix with the technetium-99m and the uterine corpus with methylene blue; one study injected the cervix with indocyanine green and the utero-ovarian ligament with methylene blue. Both tracers/injection sites successfully identified a sentinel lymph node in 132 hemipelves (132/344; 38.4%), identifying the same sentinel lymph node in 116 cases (116/132; 87.9%). The pooled concordance rate per hemipelvis was 91.8% (95% CI 0.665-1.000; I<sup>2</sup> = 92%; chi<sup>2</sup><i>p</i>-value < 0.01). Two different sentinel lymph nodes were identified in the remaining 16 hemipelves, with a pooled hemipelvis discordance rate of 8.2% (95% CI 0.000-0.335; I<sup>2</sup> = 92%; chi<sup>2</sup><i>p</i>-value < 0.01). The cervix and technetium-99m were the injection site and tracer with the highest pooled detection rate. <i>Conclusions</i>: Different uterine injection sites appear to share a common pelvic lymphatic pathway and sentinel lymph node in most cases, consistent with the current practice in endometrial cancer. Future research will confirm whether cervical injections might be proposed for pelvic sentinel lymph node mapping in all gynecological cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Uterine Injection Site Matter for the Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Pier Carlo Zorzato, Simone Garzon, Mariachiara Bosco, Filippo Ferrari, Francesca Magni, Rosa Maria Laterza, Antonio Simone Laganà, Francesco Fanfani, Stefano Uccella\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina61040699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: To summarize the evidence on in vivo uterine pelvic lymphatic drainage. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A literature search was performed in multiple electronic databases from inception to December 2024. We included all the studies that compared two different uterine injection sites in the mapping of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes by injecting two different tracers into two distinct injection sites. The primary outcomes included the concordance and discordance rates in the mapped pelvic sentinel lymph nodes between the pairs of injection sites. The secondary outcomes were the detection rates per injection site and tracer. Four reviewers independently reviewed the records for inclusion, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. Pooled concordance, discordance, and detection rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the random effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> tests. <i>Results</i>: Out of 2512 records, we included 4 studies (172 patients and 344 hemipelves). Three studies injected the cervix with the technetium-99m and the uterine corpus with methylene blue; one study injected the cervix with indocyanine green and the utero-ovarian ligament with methylene blue. Both tracers/injection sites successfully identified a sentinel lymph node in 132 hemipelves (132/344; 38.4%), identifying the same sentinel lymph node in 116 cases (116/132; 87.9%). The pooled concordance rate per hemipelvis was 91.8% (95% CI 0.665-1.000; I<sup>2</sup> = 92%; chi<sup>2</sup><i>p</i>-value < 0.01). Two different sentinel lymph nodes were identified in the remaining 16 hemipelves, with a pooled hemipelvis discordance rate of 8.2% (95% CI 0.000-0.335; I<sup>2</sup> = 92%; chi<sup>2</sup><i>p</i>-value < 0.01). The cervix and technetium-99m were the injection site and tracer with the highest pooled detection rate. <i>Conclusions</i>: Different uterine injection sites appear to share a common pelvic lymphatic pathway and sentinel lymph node in most cases, consistent with the current practice in endometrial cancer. Future research will confirm whether cervical injections might be proposed for pelvic sentinel lymph node mapping in all gynecological cancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028796/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:总结在体子宫盆腔淋巴引流的相关证据。材料与方法:检索自成立至2024年12月多个电子数据库的文献。我们纳入了所有通过向两个不同的注射部位注射两种不同的示踪剂来比较两个不同子宫注射部位盆腔前哨淋巴结定位的研究。主要结果包括对注射部位之间盆腔前哨淋巴结的一致性和不一致性率。次要结果是每个注射部位的检出率和示踪剂。四名审稿人独立审查了纳入记录,评估了偏倚风险,并提取了数据。使用随机效应模型估计95%置信区间(ci)的合并一致性、不一致性和检出率。异质性采用I2检验进行量化。结果:在2512份记录中,我们纳入了4项研究(172名患者和344名半身人)。三项研究分别在子宫颈注射锝-99m,在子宫体注射亚甲基蓝;一项研究在子宫颈注射吲哚菁绿,在子宫卵巢韧带注射亚甲基蓝。两种示踪剂/注射部位都成功地鉴定了132例半兽人的前哨淋巴结(132/344;38.4%), 116例发现相同前哨淋巴结(116/132;87.9%)。每半骨盆的合并一致性率为91.8% (95% CI 0.665-1.000;I2 = 92%;p < 0.01)。在其余16例半骨盆患者中发现了两个不同的前哨淋巴结,合并半骨盆不一致性率为8.2% (95% CI 0.000-0.335;I2 = 92%;p < 0.01)。宫颈和锝-99m是总检出率最高的注射部位和示踪剂。结论:在大多数情况下,不同的子宫注射部位似乎共享一个共同的盆腔淋巴通路和前哨淋巴结,这与目前子宫内膜癌的实践一致。未来的研究将证实宫颈注射是否可以用于所有妇科癌症的盆腔前哨淋巴结定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Uterine Injection Site Matter for the Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and Objectives: To summarize the evidence on in vivo uterine pelvic lymphatic drainage. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed in multiple electronic databases from inception to December 2024. We included all the studies that compared two different uterine injection sites in the mapping of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes by injecting two different tracers into two distinct injection sites. The primary outcomes included the concordance and discordance rates in the mapped pelvic sentinel lymph nodes between the pairs of injection sites. The secondary outcomes were the detection rates per injection site and tracer. Four reviewers independently reviewed the records for inclusion, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. Pooled concordance, discordance, and detection rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the random effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 tests. Results: Out of 2512 records, we included 4 studies (172 patients and 344 hemipelves). Three studies injected the cervix with the technetium-99m and the uterine corpus with methylene blue; one study injected the cervix with indocyanine green and the utero-ovarian ligament with methylene blue. Both tracers/injection sites successfully identified a sentinel lymph node in 132 hemipelves (132/344; 38.4%), identifying the same sentinel lymph node in 116 cases (116/132; 87.9%). The pooled concordance rate per hemipelvis was 91.8% (95% CI 0.665-1.000; I2 = 92%; chi2p-value < 0.01). Two different sentinel lymph nodes were identified in the remaining 16 hemipelves, with a pooled hemipelvis discordance rate of 8.2% (95% CI 0.000-0.335; I2 = 92%; chi2p-value < 0.01). The cervix and technetium-99m were the injection site and tracer with the highest pooled detection rate. Conclusions: Different uterine injection sites appear to share a common pelvic lymphatic pathway and sentinel lymph node in most cases, consistent with the current practice in endometrial cancer. Future research will confirm whether cervical injections might be proposed for pelvic sentinel lymph node mapping in all gynecological cancers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信