社区暴力干预和预防(CVI)的医疗补助补偿:一个多州政策实施案例研究。

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sheetal Ranjan, C Clare Strange, Katheryne Pugliese
{"title":"社区暴力干预和预防(CVI)的医疗补助补偿:一个多州政策实施案例研究。","authors":"Sheetal Ranjan, C Clare Strange, Katheryne Pugliese","doi":"10.1186/s40352-025-00327-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Violence has fluctuated in the United States in recent years. Additionally, policing practices have been challenged, especially in neighborhoods of color. Community Violence Intervention (CVI) programs have emerged as an effective policy to address violence through neighborhood-centered resources, trauma-informed care, and credible messengers, without full reliance on law enforcement officials. However, inconsistent funding challenges the feasibility and sustainability of these programs. In 2021 several states introduced policies to allocate Medicaid reimbursement for CVI services offering a promising solution to a more sustainable stream of funding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses rigorous qualitative analysis to evaluate the implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies in California, Illinois, and Connecticut, applying the Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainment (EPIS) model. An analysis of secondary documentation and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from the first three states to implement the policy. Stakeholders were recruited from a variety of policy, medical, and non-profit sectors to provide their perspectives and expertise on implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews with stakeholders from policy, medical, and non-profit sectors and a deep analysis of secondary documentation identifies key successes and barriers to effective implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies across the United States. Acknowledging the barriers of implementation highlights where policy planning and development fails to be properly implemented on the ground. Findings emphasize the need for state-specific policy adaptation, collaboration amongst policymakers and practitioners, and sufficient training for on-the-ground CVI staff members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a Medicaid reimbursement policy for CVI programs could improve the efficacy and sustainability of such programs. However, states need to be aware of the challenges that may arise during the planning and implementation phases. The findings from this study reveal that policy makers, service providers and medical professionals need to be involved and collaborative throughout the planning and implementation process of the policy. States that are planning to implement these policies should assess whether they are ready to implement the policy to ensure that it is successful in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicaid reimbursement for community violence intervention and prevention (CVI): a multi-state policy implementation case study.\",\"authors\":\"Sheetal Ranjan, C Clare Strange, Katheryne Pugliese\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40352-025-00327-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Violence has fluctuated in the United States in recent years. Additionally, policing practices have been challenged, especially in neighborhoods of color. Community Violence Intervention (CVI) programs have emerged as an effective policy to address violence through neighborhood-centered resources, trauma-informed care, and credible messengers, without full reliance on law enforcement officials. However, inconsistent funding challenges the feasibility and sustainability of these programs. In 2021 several states introduced policies to allocate Medicaid reimbursement for CVI services offering a promising solution to a more sustainable stream of funding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses rigorous qualitative analysis to evaluate the implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies in California, Illinois, and Connecticut, applying the Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainment (EPIS) model. An analysis of secondary documentation and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from the first three states to implement the policy. Stakeholders were recruited from a variety of policy, medical, and non-profit sectors to provide their perspectives and expertise on implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews with stakeholders from policy, medical, and non-profit sectors and a deep analysis of secondary documentation identifies key successes and barriers to effective implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies across the United States. Acknowledging the barriers of implementation highlights where policy planning and development fails to be properly implemented on the ground. Findings emphasize the need for state-specific policy adaptation, collaboration amongst policymakers and practitioners, and sufficient training for on-the-ground CVI staff members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a Medicaid reimbursement policy for CVI programs could improve the efficacy and sustainability of such programs. However, states need to be aware of the challenges that may arise during the planning and implementation phases. The findings from this study reveal that policy makers, service providers and medical professionals need to be involved and collaborative throughout the planning and implementation process of the policy. States that are planning to implement these policies should assess whether they are ready to implement the policy to ensure that it is successful in the long term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Justice\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036151/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00327-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00327-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,美国的暴力事件起伏不定。此外,警务实践也受到了挑战,尤其是在有色人种社区。社区暴力干预(CVI)项目已经成为一项有效的政策,通过以社区为中心的资源、创伤知情护理和可靠的信使,而不是完全依赖执法官员,来解决暴力问题。然而,不稳定的资金挑战了这些项目的可行性和可持续性。2021年,几个州出台了将医疗补助报销分配给CVI服务的政策,为更可持续的资金流提供了一个有希望的解决方案。方法:本研究采用探索-准备-实施-维持(EPIS)模型,采用严格的定性分析来评估加州、伊利诺伊州和康涅狄格州医疗补助报销政策的实施情况。对二级文件的分析和对前三个州实施该政策的主要利益相关者的半结构化访谈。从各种政策、医疗和非营利部门招募了利益攸关方,以提供他们对执行工作的看法和专门知识。结果:与政策、医疗和非营利部门的利益相关者进行访谈,并对二级文件进行深入分析,确定了在美国有效实施医疗补助报销政策的关键成功和障碍。承认实施的障碍突出了政策规划和发展未能在实地得到适当实施的地方。调查结果强调需要针对具体国家进行政策调整、政策制定者和实践者之间的合作以及对实地CVI工作人员的充分培训。结论:实施医疗补助报销政策可以提高CVI项目的有效性和可持续性。然而,各国需要意识到在规划和实施阶段可能出现的挑战。这项研究的结果表明,在整个政策的规划和实施过程中,政策制定者、服务提供者和医疗专业人员需要参与和协作。计划实施这些政策的国家应评估它们是否准备好实施这些政策,以确保其长期成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicaid reimbursement for community violence intervention and prevention (CVI): a multi-state policy implementation case study.

Background: Violence has fluctuated in the United States in recent years. Additionally, policing practices have been challenged, especially in neighborhoods of color. Community Violence Intervention (CVI) programs have emerged as an effective policy to address violence through neighborhood-centered resources, trauma-informed care, and credible messengers, without full reliance on law enforcement officials. However, inconsistent funding challenges the feasibility and sustainability of these programs. In 2021 several states introduced policies to allocate Medicaid reimbursement for CVI services offering a promising solution to a more sustainable stream of funding.

Methods: This study uses rigorous qualitative analysis to evaluate the implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies in California, Illinois, and Connecticut, applying the Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainment (EPIS) model. An analysis of secondary documentation and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from the first three states to implement the policy. Stakeholders were recruited from a variety of policy, medical, and non-profit sectors to provide their perspectives and expertise on implementation.

Results: Interviews with stakeholders from policy, medical, and non-profit sectors and a deep analysis of secondary documentation identifies key successes and barriers to effective implementation of Medicaid reimbursement policies across the United States. Acknowledging the barriers of implementation highlights where policy planning and development fails to be properly implemented on the ground. Findings emphasize the need for state-specific policy adaptation, collaboration amongst policymakers and practitioners, and sufficient training for on-the-ground CVI staff members.

Conclusions: Implementation of a Medicaid reimbursement policy for CVI programs could improve the efficacy and sustainability of such programs. However, states need to be aware of the challenges that may arise during the planning and implementation phases. The findings from this study reveal that policy makers, service providers and medical professionals need to be involved and collaborative throughout the planning and implementation process of the policy. States that are planning to implement these policies should assess whether they are ready to implement the policy to ensure that it is successful in the long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信