创伤性脑损伤与非创伤性脑损伤成人自我效能、自我同情和成长心态的比较

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Danielle H Girard, Leah L Kapa, Kristen Ackley
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤与非创伤性脑损伤成人自我效能、自我同情和成长心态的比较","authors":"Danielle H Girard, Leah L Kapa, Kristen Ackley","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated whether performance on predictors of academic achievement, namely, self-efficacy, self-compassion, and growth mindset, differ between adults, primarily college students, with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their peers without TBI history.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty-nine respondents anonymously completed an online survey that included demographic questions and three predictive measures of academic achievement: the New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE), the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF), and the Growth Mindset Scale. An additional 12 participants with TBI from a previous study (Ackley, 2022) were included in our data analyses, which compared results between participants with and without a TBI history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the group level, respondents with a TBI history demonstrated a significantly higher growth mindset than uninjured peers. An age- and gender-matched comparison of a smaller subsample of college student participants confirmed the group difference on growth mindset and revealed higher self-efficacy scores among the student group with a TBI history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a group, individuals with TBI did not demonstrate significant differences on self-efficacy and self-compassion measures relative to uninjured peers and also demonstrated higher growth mindset. Thus, evidence does not support the assumption that these are areas of deficit for individuals with TBI history, which suggests that the NGSE, the SCS-SF, and the Growth Mindset Scale are not meaningful ways of measuring progress during cognitive-linguistic treatment in college students who have sustained TBIs unless an individual demonstrates specific deficits in these areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Self-Efficacy, Self-Compassion, and Growth Mindset Among Adults With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle H Girard, Leah L Kapa, Kristen Ackley\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated whether performance on predictors of academic achievement, namely, self-efficacy, self-compassion, and growth mindset, differ between adults, primarily college students, with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their peers without TBI history.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty-nine respondents anonymously completed an online survey that included demographic questions and three predictive measures of academic achievement: the New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE), the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF), and the Growth Mindset Scale. An additional 12 participants with TBI from a previous study (Ackley, 2022) were included in our data analyses, which compared results between participants with and without a TBI history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the group level, respondents with a TBI history demonstrated a significantly higher growth mindset than uninjured peers. An age- and gender-matched comparison of a smaller subsample of college student participants confirmed the group difference on growth mindset and revealed higher self-efficacy scores among the student group with a TBI history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a group, individuals with TBI did not demonstrate significant differences on self-efficacy and self-compassion measures relative to uninjured peers and also demonstrated higher growth mindset. Thus, evidence does not support the assumption that these are areas of deficit for individuals with TBI history, which suggests that the NGSE, the SCS-SF, and the Growth Mindset Scale are not meaningful ways of measuring progress during cognitive-linguistic treatment in college students who have sustained TBIs unless an individual demonstrates specific deficits in these areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)史的成人(主要是大学生)与无创伤性脑损伤史的同龄人在学业成就预测因子,即自我效能感、自我同情和成长心态方面的表现是否存在差异。方法:89名受访者匿名完成了一项在线调查,调查内容包括人口统计学问题和三种学业成就预测量表:新一般自我效能量表(NGSE)、自我同情量表-简表(SCS-SF)和成长心态量表。我们的数据分析中还包括了之前研究(Ackley, 2022)中另外12名TBI患者,比较了有和没有TBI病史的参与者的结果。结果:在群体水平上,有创伤性脑损伤史的被调查者比未受伤的同龄人表现出更高的成长心态。对一个较小的大学生样本进行年龄和性别匹配的比较,证实了成长心态的群体差异,并揭示了有创伤性脑损伤史的学生群体的自我效能得分更高。结论:从整体上看,脑损伤个体在自我效能感和自我同情指标上与未受伤同伴没有显著差异,同时表现出更高的成长心态。因此,证据并不支持这一假设,即这些是有TBI病史的个体的缺陷区域,这表明NGSE、SCS-SF和成长心态量表不是衡量持续TBI的大学生认知语言治疗进展的有意义的方法,除非个体在这些区域表现出特定的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Self-Efficacy, Self-Compassion, and Growth Mindset Among Adults With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.

Purpose: We investigated whether performance on predictors of academic achievement, namely, self-efficacy, self-compassion, and growth mindset, differ between adults, primarily college students, with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their peers without TBI history.

Method: Eighty-nine respondents anonymously completed an online survey that included demographic questions and three predictive measures of academic achievement: the New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE), the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF), and the Growth Mindset Scale. An additional 12 participants with TBI from a previous study (Ackley, 2022) were included in our data analyses, which compared results between participants with and without a TBI history.

Results: At the group level, respondents with a TBI history demonstrated a significantly higher growth mindset than uninjured peers. An age- and gender-matched comparison of a smaller subsample of college student participants confirmed the group difference on growth mindset and revealed higher self-efficacy scores among the student group with a TBI history.

Conclusions: As a group, individuals with TBI did not demonstrate significant differences on self-efficacy and self-compassion measures relative to uninjured peers and also demonstrated higher growth mindset. Thus, evidence does not support the assumption that these are areas of deficit for individuals with TBI history, which suggests that the NGSE, the SCS-SF, and the Growth Mindset Scale are not meaningful ways of measuring progress during cognitive-linguistic treatment in college students who have sustained TBIs unless an individual demonstrates specific deficits in these areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信