Konstantina Katsoulis, Danielle R Bouchard, Rogih R Andrawes, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Jennifer Copeland, Sean Horton, Shilpa Dogra
{"title":"“这很好。真的很好吃。老年人、运动/娱乐专业人士和初级保健提供者对使用楼梯方法设计运动行为干预的看法。","authors":"Konstantina Katsoulis, Danielle R Bouchard, Rogih R Andrawes, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Jennifer Copeland, Sean Horton, Shilpa Dogra","doi":"10.1123/japa.2024-0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Interventions targeting sedentary behavior in older adults have reported mixed success for behavior change. The previously proposed Staircase Approach offers a novel strategy to support long-term behavior change by targeting a reduction in sedentary time before progressing to increasing physical activity levels. The current study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults, exercise/recreation professionals, and primary care providers (PCPs) about the critical components of a new intervention based on the Staircase Approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (older adults, 65+ years; PCPs; and exercise/recreation professionals) from three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and New Brunswick), participated in semistructured focus groups. Transcripts from the sessions were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in the context of a previously conducted review by our team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 focus groups (n = 50): four in older adults (n = 14), five with PCPs (n = 14), and eight with exercise/recreation professionals (n = 22). Participants expressed varying opinions on the components necessary for a relevant intervention. The need to embed options within the intervention, and to promote and deliver the intervention, was clear. Some themes were consistent across and within groups (e.g., simple, motivational messaging), whereas others differed (e.g., education, delivery mode, and contact). PCPs added insights about the needs of older adults who typically do not participate in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults have varied requirements, preferences, and skill levels that necessitate providing many options in any newly designed intervention. Significance/Implications: The intervention for the new Staircase Approach will require collaboration between multiple sectors to be successful.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It's Good. It's Really Good.\\\": Perspectives of Older Adults, Exercise/Recreation Professionals, and Primary Care Providers on Designing a Movement Behavior Intervention Using the Staircase Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantina Katsoulis, Danielle R Bouchard, Rogih R Andrawes, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Jennifer Copeland, Sean Horton, Shilpa Dogra\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/japa.2024-0175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Interventions targeting sedentary behavior in older adults have reported mixed success for behavior change. The previously proposed Staircase Approach offers a novel strategy to support long-term behavior change by targeting a reduction in sedentary time before progressing to increasing physical activity levels. The current study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults, exercise/recreation professionals, and primary care providers (PCPs) about the critical components of a new intervention based on the Staircase Approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (older adults, 65+ years; PCPs; and exercise/recreation professionals) from three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and New Brunswick), participated in semistructured focus groups. Transcripts from the sessions were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in the context of a previously conducted review by our team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 focus groups (n = 50): four in older adults (n = 14), five with PCPs (n = 14), and eight with exercise/recreation professionals (n = 22). Participants expressed varying opinions on the components necessary for a relevant intervention. The need to embed options within the intervention, and to promote and deliver the intervention, was clear. Some themes were consistent across and within groups (e.g., simple, motivational messaging), whereas others differed (e.g., education, delivery mode, and contact). PCPs added insights about the needs of older adults who typically do not participate in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults have varied requirements, preferences, and skill levels that necessitate providing many options in any newly designed intervention. Significance/Implications: The intervention for the new Staircase Approach will require collaboration between multiple sectors to be successful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"It's Good. It's Really Good.": Perspectives of Older Adults, Exercise/Recreation Professionals, and Primary Care Providers on Designing a Movement Behavior Intervention Using the Staircase Approach.
Background/objectives: Interventions targeting sedentary behavior in older adults have reported mixed success for behavior change. The previously proposed Staircase Approach offers a novel strategy to support long-term behavior change by targeting a reduction in sedentary time before progressing to increasing physical activity levels. The current study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults, exercise/recreation professionals, and primary care providers (PCPs) about the critical components of a new intervention based on the Staircase Approach.
Methods: Participants (older adults, 65+ years; PCPs; and exercise/recreation professionals) from three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and New Brunswick), participated in semistructured focus groups. Transcripts from the sessions were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in the context of a previously conducted review by our team.
Results: There were 17 focus groups (n = 50): four in older adults (n = 14), five with PCPs (n = 14), and eight with exercise/recreation professionals (n = 22). Participants expressed varying opinions on the components necessary for a relevant intervention. The need to embed options within the intervention, and to promote and deliver the intervention, was clear. Some themes were consistent across and within groups (e.g., simple, motivational messaging), whereas others differed (e.g., education, delivery mode, and contact). PCPs added insights about the needs of older adults who typically do not participate in research.
Conclusion: Older adults have varied requirements, preferences, and skill levels that necessitate providing many options in any newly designed intervention. Significance/Implications: The intervention for the new Staircase Approach will require collaboration between multiple sectors to be successful.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults.
In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.