“这很好。真的很好吃。老年人、运动/娱乐专业人士和初级保健提供者对使用楼梯方法设计运动行为干预的看法。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Konstantina Katsoulis, Danielle R Bouchard, Rogih R Andrawes, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Jennifer Copeland, Sean Horton, Shilpa Dogra
{"title":"“这很好。真的很好吃。老年人、运动/娱乐专业人士和初级保健提供者对使用楼梯方法设计运动行为干预的看法。","authors":"Konstantina Katsoulis, Danielle R Bouchard, Rogih R Andrawes, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Jennifer Copeland, Sean Horton, Shilpa Dogra","doi":"10.1123/japa.2024-0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Interventions targeting sedentary behavior in older adults have reported mixed success for behavior change. The previously proposed Staircase Approach offers a novel strategy to support long-term behavior change by targeting a reduction in sedentary time before progressing to increasing physical activity levels. The current study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults, exercise/recreation professionals, and primary care providers (PCPs) about the critical components of a new intervention based on the Staircase Approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (older adults, 65+ years; PCPs; and exercise/recreation professionals) from three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and New Brunswick), participated in semistructured focus groups. Transcripts from the sessions were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in the context of a previously conducted review by our team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 focus groups (n = 50): four in older adults (n = 14), five with PCPs (n = 14), and eight with exercise/recreation professionals (n = 22). Participants expressed varying opinions on the components necessary for a relevant intervention. The need to embed options within the intervention, and to promote and deliver the intervention, was clear. Some themes were consistent across and within groups (e.g., simple, motivational messaging), whereas others differed (e.g., education, delivery mode, and contact). PCPs added insights about the needs of older adults who typically do not participate in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults have varied requirements, preferences, and skill levels that necessitate providing many options in any newly designed intervention. Significance/Implications: The intervention for the new Staircase Approach will require collaboration between multiple sectors to be successful.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It's Good. It's Really Good.\\\": Perspectives of Older Adults, Exercise/Recreation Professionals, and Primary Care Providers on Designing a Movement Behavior Intervention Using the Staircase Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantina Katsoulis, Danielle R Bouchard, Rogih R Andrawes, Bill Kapralos, David Dunstan, Jennifer Copeland, Sean Horton, Shilpa Dogra\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/japa.2024-0175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Interventions targeting sedentary behavior in older adults have reported mixed success for behavior change. The previously proposed Staircase Approach offers a novel strategy to support long-term behavior change by targeting a reduction in sedentary time before progressing to increasing physical activity levels. The current study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults, exercise/recreation professionals, and primary care providers (PCPs) about the critical components of a new intervention based on the Staircase Approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (older adults, 65+ years; PCPs; and exercise/recreation professionals) from three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and New Brunswick), participated in semistructured focus groups. Transcripts from the sessions were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in the context of a previously conducted review by our team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 focus groups (n = 50): four in older adults (n = 14), five with PCPs (n = 14), and eight with exercise/recreation professionals (n = 22). Participants expressed varying opinions on the components necessary for a relevant intervention. The need to embed options within the intervention, and to promote and deliver the intervention, was clear. Some themes were consistent across and within groups (e.g., simple, motivational messaging), whereas others differed (e.g., education, delivery mode, and contact). PCPs added insights about the needs of older adults who typically do not participate in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults have varied requirements, preferences, and skill levels that necessitate providing many options in any newly designed intervention. Significance/Implications: The intervention for the new Staircase Approach will require collaboration between multiple sectors to be successful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:针对老年人久坐行为的干预措施在行为改变方面取得了不同程度的成功。先前提出的楼梯方法提供了一种新的策略,通过减少久坐时间来支持长期的行为改变,然后再增加身体活动水平。目前的研究旨在了解老年人、运动/娱乐专业人员和初级保健提供者(pcp)对基于楼梯方法的新干预措施的关键组成部分的看法。方法:参与者(老年人,65岁以上;pcp;以及来自加拿大三个省(阿尔伯塔省、安大略省和新不伦瑞克省)的运动/娱乐专业人士,参加了半结构化的焦点小组。在我们小组先前进行的审查的背景下,使用反身性专题分析分析了会议记录。结果:共有17个焦点组(n = 50): 4个老年人(n = 14), 5个pcp (n = 14), 8个运动/娱乐专业人士(n = 22)。与会者对相关干预措施的必要组成部分表达了不同的意见。很明显,有必要在干预措施中嵌入选项,并促进和实施干预措施。有些主题在小组之间和小组内部是一致的(例如,简单的、激励的信息传递),而其他主题则不同(例如,教育、传递模式和联系)。pcp增加了对通常不参与研究的老年人需求的见解。结论:老年人有不同的需求、偏好和技能水平,需要在任何新设计的干预措施中提供多种选择。意义/影响:新阶梯方法的干预需要多个部门之间的合作才能成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It's Good. It's Really Good.": Perspectives of Older Adults, Exercise/Recreation Professionals, and Primary Care Providers on Designing a Movement Behavior Intervention Using the Staircase Approach.

Background/objectives: Interventions targeting sedentary behavior in older adults have reported mixed success for behavior change. The previously proposed Staircase Approach offers a novel strategy to support long-term behavior change by targeting a reduction in sedentary time before progressing to increasing physical activity levels. The current study aimed to understand the perceptions of older adults, exercise/recreation professionals, and primary care providers (PCPs) about the critical components of a new intervention based on the Staircase Approach.

Methods: Participants (older adults, 65+ years; PCPs; and exercise/recreation professionals) from three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and New Brunswick), participated in semistructured focus groups. Transcripts from the sessions were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis in the context of a previously conducted review by our team.

Results: There were 17 focus groups (n = 50): four in older adults (n = 14), five with PCPs (n = 14), and eight with exercise/recreation professionals (n = 22). Participants expressed varying opinions on the components necessary for a relevant intervention. The need to embed options within the intervention, and to promote and deliver the intervention, was clear. Some themes were consistent across and within groups (e.g., simple, motivational messaging), whereas others differed (e.g., education, delivery mode, and contact). PCPs added insights about the needs of older adults who typically do not participate in research.

Conclusion: Older adults have varied requirements, preferences, and skill levels that necessitate providing many options in any newly designed intervention. Significance/Implications: The intervention for the new Staircase Approach will require collaboration between multiple sectors to be successful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults. In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信