临终关怀使用的死因:犹他州人口数据库的队列研究。

IF 1.4
Rebecca L Utz, Michael Hollingshaus, Attrayee Bandyopadhyay, Kathie Supiano, Margaret Clayton, Katherine A Ornstein, Djin Tay, Eli Iacob, Ken Smith, Caroline Stephens
{"title":"临终关怀使用的死因:犹他州人口数据库的队列研究。","authors":"Rebecca L Utz, Michael Hollingshaus, Attrayee Bandyopadhyay, Kathie Supiano, Margaret Clayton, Katherine A Ornstein, Djin Tay, Eli Iacob, Ken Smith, Caroline Stephens","doi":"10.1177/10499091251338254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeIllnesses such as cancer often follow a predictable trajectory of decline, while others, such as Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), follow a more dwindling and protracted decline. Hospice, a form of EOL palliative care for individuals with less than 6 months of remaining life, was originally created for patients with life-limiting cancer but is increasingly used by all patients with all types of life-limiting diagnoses. This study assesses whether hospice use differs by the underlying cause of death and whether current hospice eligibility and practices provide optimal EOL to all causes of death.MethodBased on data from 17,321 hospice users drawn from the Caregiver Population Science (C-PopS) decedent cohort of the Utah Population Database (UPDB), we used multinomial regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves to model hospice length-of-stay by cause of death, in order to identify patterns of hospice use by patients who have different underlying causes of death.Major FindingsNon-cancer decedents were more likely to have sub-optimal patterns of hospice care, including <i>minimal use</i>, lasting less than a week, and <i>extended use</i>, lasting more than 6 months. Stroke decedents were the most likely to have <i>minimal-use</i> patterns of hospice, whereas dementia and COPD decedents were most likely to have <i>extended use</i>.ConclusionNew models of hospice-like EOL care that can accommodate both short-term and long-term palliative care needs may help meet the diverse needs of patients and families facing different EOL trajectories associated with common causes of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251338254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospice Use by Cause of Death: A Cohort Study Using Utah Population Database.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L Utz, Michael Hollingshaus, Attrayee Bandyopadhyay, Kathie Supiano, Margaret Clayton, Katherine A Ornstein, Djin Tay, Eli Iacob, Ken Smith, Caroline Stephens\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091251338254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeIllnesses such as cancer often follow a predictable trajectory of decline, while others, such as Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), follow a more dwindling and protracted decline. Hospice, a form of EOL palliative care for individuals with less than 6 months of remaining life, was originally created for patients with life-limiting cancer but is increasingly used by all patients with all types of life-limiting diagnoses. This study assesses whether hospice use differs by the underlying cause of death and whether current hospice eligibility and practices provide optimal EOL to all causes of death.MethodBased on data from 17,321 hospice users drawn from the Caregiver Population Science (C-PopS) decedent cohort of the Utah Population Database (UPDB), we used multinomial regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves to model hospice length-of-stay by cause of death, in order to identify patterns of hospice use by patients who have different underlying causes of death.Major FindingsNon-cancer decedents were more likely to have sub-optimal patterns of hospice care, including <i>minimal use</i>, lasting less than a week, and <i>extended use</i>, lasting more than 6 months. Stroke decedents were the most likely to have <i>minimal-use</i> patterns of hospice, whereas dementia and COPD decedents were most likely to have <i>extended use</i>.ConclusionNew models of hospice-like EOL care that can accommodate both short-term and long-term palliative care needs may help meet the diverse needs of patients and families facing different EOL trajectories associated with common causes of death.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10499091251338254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251338254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251338254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症等疾病通常遵循可预测的衰退轨迹,而其他疾病,如阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),则遵循更少和更持久的衰退轨迹。临终关怀是一种针对剩余生命不足6个月的患者的EOL姑息治疗形式,最初是为患有限制生命的癌症的患者创建的,但越来越多地被所有患有各种限制生命的诊断的患者使用。本研究评估安宁疗护的使用是否因潜在的死亡原因而不同,以及目前安宁疗护的资格和实践是否能为所有死因提供最佳的EOL。方法基于犹他州人口数据库(UPDB)的照护者人口科学(C-PopS)死者队列中17,321名安宁疗护使用者的数据,我们使用多项回归分析和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,根据死亡原因对安宁疗护住院时间进行建模,以确定不同潜在死亡原因的患者使用安宁疗护的模式。主要发现非癌症死者更有可能有次优的临终关怀模式,包括最少的使用,持续不到一周,延长使用,持续超过6个月。中风患者最有可能使用最少的临终关怀模式,而痴呆症和慢性阻塞性肺病患者最有可能延长临终关怀的使用时间。结论基于短期和长期姑息治疗需求的类似临终关怀的EOL护理新模式有助于满足面临不同EOL轨迹的患者和家庭的多样化需求,这些患者和家庭面临与常见死亡原因相关的不同EOL轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hospice Use by Cause of Death: A Cohort Study Using Utah Population Database.

PurposeIllnesses such as cancer often follow a predictable trajectory of decline, while others, such as Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), follow a more dwindling and protracted decline. Hospice, a form of EOL palliative care for individuals with less than 6 months of remaining life, was originally created for patients with life-limiting cancer but is increasingly used by all patients with all types of life-limiting diagnoses. This study assesses whether hospice use differs by the underlying cause of death and whether current hospice eligibility and practices provide optimal EOL to all causes of death.MethodBased on data from 17,321 hospice users drawn from the Caregiver Population Science (C-PopS) decedent cohort of the Utah Population Database (UPDB), we used multinomial regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves to model hospice length-of-stay by cause of death, in order to identify patterns of hospice use by patients who have different underlying causes of death.Major FindingsNon-cancer decedents were more likely to have sub-optimal patterns of hospice care, including minimal use, lasting less than a week, and extended use, lasting more than 6 months. Stroke decedents were the most likely to have minimal-use patterns of hospice, whereas dementia and COPD decedents were most likely to have extended use.ConclusionNew models of hospice-like EOL care that can accommodate both short-term and long-term palliative care needs may help meet the diverse needs of patients and families facing different EOL trajectories associated with common causes of death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信