皮秒分数1064 nm Nd:YAG激光与分数10600 nm二氧化碳激光治疗腹部白纹的比较研究:一项随机、前瞻性、评估者盲法的裂腹试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Sharmaine H Lozano, Zharlah Gulmatico-Flores, Ma Flordeliz Abad-Casintahan
{"title":"皮秒分数1064 nm Nd:YAG激光与分数10600 nm二氧化碳激光治疗腹部白纹的比较研究:一项随机、前瞻性、评估者盲法的裂腹试验。","authors":"Sharmaine H Lozano, Zharlah Gulmatico-Flores, Ma Flordeliz Abad-Casintahan","doi":"10.1080/14764172.2025.2497416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Striae distensae are common disfiguring atrophic dermal scars. Fractional lasers have been utilized to improve the appearance of this condition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of picosecond fractional 1064-nm Nd:YAG (PS Nd:YAG) laser versus fractional 10,600-nm Carbon Dioxide (CO2) laser in treating abdominal striae alba (SA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two women with Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and abdominal SA participated in a split-abdomen study, receiving four sessions of fractional PS Nd:YAG and CO2 laser treatments on each side at four-week intervals. Striae texture, atrophy, clinical improvement, and satisfaction were assessed for each side at one and three months, with striae length and width compared pre- and post-treatment. Adverse reactions were noted at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Abdomen treated with both lasers had significantly improved skin texture, atrophy and clinical improvements (assessed by physicians and patients) at both follow-ups (p < 0.05), with no difference between the two. Striae length and width did not change significantly (p = 0.203 and p = 0.558). Patients reported greater improvement on the CO2-treated side at 1 month, but not at the final follow-up. High satisfaction was noted for both lasers. Adverse reactions noted after both lasers include erythema, edema, crusting/scaling, pruritus, pain and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The PS Nd:YAG laser was associated with greater pain (p < 0.05), but shorter healing time of 10.26 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both fractional PS Nd:YAG and CO2 lasers were effective, well-tolerated and safe treatment options for SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Picosecond Fractional 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser Versus Fractional 10,600-nm Carbon Dioxide Laser in the Treatment of Abdominal Striae Alba: A Randomized, Prospective, Assessor-blinded, Split-abdomen Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sharmaine H Lozano, Zharlah Gulmatico-Flores, Ma Flordeliz Abad-Casintahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14764172.2025.2497416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Striae distensae are common disfiguring atrophic dermal scars. Fractional lasers have been utilized to improve the appearance of this condition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of picosecond fractional 1064-nm Nd:YAG (PS Nd:YAG) laser versus fractional 10,600-nm Carbon Dioxide (CO2) laser in treating abdominal striae alba (SA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two women with Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and abdominal SA participated in a split-abdomen study, receiving four sessions of fractional PS Nd:YAG and CO2 laser treatments on each side at four-week intervals. Striae texture, atrophy, clinical improvement, and satisfaction were assessed for each side at one and three months, with striae length and width compared pre- and post-treatment. Adverse reactions were noted at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Abdomen treated with both lasers had significantly improved skin texture, atrophy and clinical improvements (assessed by physicians and patients) at both follow-ups (p < 0.05), with no difference between the two. Striae length and width did not change significantly (p = 0.203 and p = 0.558). Patients reported greater improvement on the CO2-treated side at 1 month, but not at the final follow-up. High satisfaction was noted for both lasers. Adverse reactions noted after both lasers include erythema, edema, crusting/scaling, pruritus, pain and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The PS Nd:YAG laser was associated with greater pain (p < 0.05), but shorter healing time of 10.26 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both fractional PS Nd:YAG and CO2 lasers were effective, well-tolerated and safe treatment options for SA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2025.2497416\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2025.2497416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扩张纹是常见的萎缩性皮肤疤痕。分数激光已被用于改善这种情况的外观。目的:比较皮秒分数1064 nm Nd:YAG (PS Nd:YAG)激光与分数10600 nm CO2 (CO2)激光治疗腹部白纹(SA)的疗效和安全性。方法:32名患有Fitzpatrick皮肤III-V型和腹部SA的女性参加了一项裂腹研究,每隔四周在每侧接受4次PS Nd:YAG和CO2激光治疗。在1个月和3个月时评估每侧的条纹质地、萎缩、临床改善和满意度,并比较治疗前和治疗后的条纹长度和宽度。每次就诊时均记录不良反应。结果:两种激光治疗腹部的皮肤质地、萎缩和临床改善(医生和患者评估)在两次随访中均有显著改善(p < 0.05),两者之间无差异。纹长和纹宽变化不显著(p = 0.203和p = 0.558)。患者在1个月时报告二氧化碳治疗侧有较大改善,但在最后随访时没有。两种激光器的满意度都很高。两种激光治疗后的不良反应包括红斑、水肿、结痂/脱屑、瘙痒、疼痛和炎症后色素沉着。PS Nd:YAG激光治疗组疼痛加重(p < 0.05),但愈合时间较短(10.26 d)。结论:分数PS Nd:YAG和CO2激光均是治疗SA有效、耐受性好、安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Picosecond Fractional 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser Versus Fractional 10,600-nm Carbon Dioxide Laser in the Treatment of Abdominal Striae Alba: A Randomized, Prospective, Assessor-blinded, Split-abdomen Trial.

Background: Striae distensae are common disfiguring atrophic dermal scars. Fractional lasers have been utilized to improve the appearance of this condition.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of picosecond fractional 1064-nm Nd:YAG (PS Nd:YAG) laser versus fractional 10,600-nm Carbon Dioxide (CO2) laser in treating abdominal striae alba (SA).

Methods: Thirty-two women with Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and abdominal SA participated in a split-abdomen study, receiving four sessions of fractional PS Nd:YAG and CO2 laser treatments on each side at four-week intervals. Striae texture, atrophy, clinical improvement, and satisfaction were assessed for each side at one and three months, with striae length and width compared pre- and post-treatment. Adverse reactions were noted at each visit.

Results: Abdomen treated with both lasers had significantly improved skin texture, atrophy and clinical improvements (assessed by physicians and patients) at both follow-ups (p < 0.05), with no difference between the two. Striae length and width did not change significantly (p = 0.203 and p = 0.558). Patients reported greater improvement on the CO2-treated side at 1 month, but not at the final follow-up. High satisfaction was noted for both lasers. Adverse reactions noted after both lasers include erythema, edema, crusting/scaling, pruritus, pain and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The PS Nd:YAG laser was associated with greater pain (p < 0.05), but shorter healing time of 10.26 days.

Conclusion: Both fractional PS Nd:YAG and CO2 lasers were effective, well-tolerated and safe treatment options for SA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique journal that focuses on the application of cosmetic laser and light therapies on the skin. The Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy provides a forum for stimulating and up-to-date studies demonstrating the wide range of therapeutic options for clinicians and surgeons involved in cosmetic and dermatological treatment. The journal is aimed at dermatologists, cosmetic surgeons, plastic and facial plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and all those interested in the rapidly expanding field of cosmetic and laser therapy. Features include: -Cosmetic surgery, including facial rejuvenation, hair removal and skin resurfacing -Use of lasers and other light sources for cosmetic and dermatological treatment -Applications of peeling agents, fillers, injectables, implants and other cosmetic modalities -Topical treatments -Practical tips and safety issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信