先进心血管生命支持提供者在线交互式除颤器模拟的开发和试点。

Michael R Kazior, Fei Chen, Kimberly S Samuels, Christopher Samouce, Nikolaus Gravenstein, Samsun Lampotang, Susan M Martinelli
{"title":"先进心血管生命支持提供者在线交互式除颤器模拟的开发和试点。","authors":"Michael R Kazior, Fei Chen, Kimberly S Samuels, Christopher Samouce, Nikolaus Gravenstein, Samsun Lampotang, Susan M Martinelli","doi":"10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Kazior","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To decrease the risk of device mismanagement when using manual external defibrillators (MED), we created and piloted an online simulation to build and assess skills in using an MED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subject matter experts from anesthesiology, critical care, and nursing developed an online, interactive simulation-based curriculum for the MED device used at the VA Health System (R Series, Zoll) following the successive approximation method. Content was from the 2020 American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines and product manufacturer recommendations. Instructions for ACLS providers on how to correctly place defibrillator pads and perform synchronized cardioversion, defibrillation, and transcutaneous pacing were included. During the pilot study, 22 users from one institution completed a pre-assessment (baseline ability to place pads, perform the 3 defibrillator tasks), watched instructional videos and engaged with an interactive tutorial, and, in the post-assessment, must have correctly completed each task independently. The assessments tracked \"pass/fail,\" number of attempts, and the time to complete each task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feedback from users was positive. Completing the simulation-based curriculum resulted in improved device management on a simulated device. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed no significant change in time to place defibrillator pads, but there was a significant reduction in time to perform a cardioversion (median [interquartile range] = 31.31 [34.23] vs 20.10 [13.92] seconds; <i>P</i> = .001), defibrillation (19.79 [19.24] vs 15.54 [6.22] seconds; <i>P</i> < .0001), and pacing (39.51 [30.72] vs 20.07 [10.59] seconds; <i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The online simulation-based curriculum was well received and should be particularly useful for those who do not have ready access to in-person MED training.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"27 1","pages":"E739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Pilot of an Online, Interactive Defibrillator Simulation for Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Michael R Kazior, Fei Chen, Kimberly S Samuels, Christopher Samouce, Nikolaus Gravenstein, Samsun Lampotang, Susan M Martinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Kazior\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To decrease the risk of device mismanagement when using manual external defibrillators (MED), we created and piloted an online simulation to build and assess skills in using an MED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subject matter experts from anesthesiology, critical care, and nursing developed an online, interactive simulation-based curriculum for the MED device used at the VA Health System (R Series, Zoll) following the successive approximation method. Content was from the 2020 American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines and product manufacturer recommendations. Instructions for ACLS providers on how to correctly place defibrillator pads and perform synchronized cardioversion, defibrillation, and transcutaneous pacing were included. During the pilot study, 22 users from one institution completed a pre-assessment (baseline ability to place pads, perform the 3 defibrillator tasks), watched instructional videos and engaged with an interactive tutorial, and, in the post-assessment, must have correctly completed each task independently. The assessments tracked \\\"pass/fail,\\\" number of attempts, and the time to complete each task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feedback from users was positive. Completing the simulation-based curriculum resulted in improved device management on a simulated device. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed no significant change in time to place defibrillator pads, but there was a significant reduction in time to perform a cardioversion (median [interquartile range] = 31.31 [34.23] vs 20.10 [13.92] seconds; <i>P</i> = .001), defibrillation (19.79 [19.24] vs 15.54 [6.22] seconds; <i>P</i> < .0001), and pacing (39.51 [30.72] vs 20.07 [10.59] seconds; <i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The online simulation-based curriculum was well received and should be particularly useful for those who do not have ready access to in-person MED training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"E739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978221/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Kazior\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Kazior","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了降低使用手动体外除颤器(MED)时设备管理不当的风险,我们创建并试点了一个在线模拟,以建立和评估使用MED的技能。方法:来自麻醉学、重症监护和护理学的主题专家根据连续逼近法,为VA卫生系统(R系列,Zoll)使用的MED设备开发了一个基于在线交互式模拟的课程。内容来自2020年美国心脏协会高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)指南和产品制造商建议。包括ACLS提供者如何正确放置除颤器垫和执行同步心律转复、除颤和经皮起搏的说明。在试点研究期间,来自一家机构的22名用户完成了预评估(放置护垫、执行3项除颤器任务的基线能力),观看了教学视频并参与了互动教程,并且在后评估中,必须独立正确完成了每项任务。评估跟踪“通过/失败”、尝试次数和完成每个任务的时间。结果:用户反馈良好。完成以模拟为基础的课程,可以改善模拟设备的设备管理。Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示,放置除颤器垫的时间没有显著变化,但进行心脏复律的时间显著缩短(中位数[四分位数间距]= 31.31 [34.23]vs 20.10[13.92]秒;P = .001),除颤(19.79 [19.24]vs 15.54[6.22]秒;P < 0.0001),起搏(39.51 [30.72]vs 20.07[10.59]秒;P < 0.0001)。结论:以在线模拟为基础的课程很受欢迎,对于那些没有机会亲自参加医学培训的人来说尤其有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Pilot of an Online, Interactive Defibrillator Simulation for Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Providers.

Background: To decrease the risk of device mismanagement when using manual external defibrillators (MED), we created and piloted an online simulation to build and assess skills in using an MED.

Methods: Subject matter experts from anesthesiology, critical care, and nursing developed an online, interactive simulation-based curriculum for the MED device used at the VA Health System (R Series, Zoll) following the successive approximation method. Content was from the 2020 American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines and product manufacturer recommendations. Instructions for ACLS providers on how to correctly place defibrillator pads and perform synchronized cardioversion, defibrillation, and transcutaneous pacing were included. During the pilot study, 22 users from one institution completed a pre-assessment (baseline ability to place pads, perform the 3 defibrillator tasks), watched instructional videos and engaged with an interactive tutorial, and, in the post-assessment, must have correctly completed each task independently. The assessments tracked "pass/fail," number of attempts, and the time to complete each task.

Results: Feedback from users was positive. Completing the simulation-based curriculum resulted in improved device management on a simulated device. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed no significant change in time to place defibrillator pads, but there was a significant reduction in time to perform a cardioversion (median [interquartile range] = 31.31 [34.23] vs 20.10 [13.92] seconds; P = .001), defibrillation (19.79 [19.24] vs 15.54 [6.22] seconds; P < .0001), and pacing (39.51 [30.72] vs 20.07 [10.59] seconds; P < .0001).

Conclusions: The online simulation-based curriculum was well received and should be particularly useful for those who do not have ready access to in-person MED training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信