{"title":"不同初始后倾角在透明矫正器闭合拔牙间隙时的生物力学效应:有限元分析。","authors":"Yiru Jiang, Jue Wang, Lingling Hu, Xiaoyan Chen, Xiaoxia Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different initial mesiodistal inclinations of posterior teeth during extraction space closure using clear aligner treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three different finite element models were developed for first premolar extractions, each representing different initial mesiodistal inclinations of the posterior teeth: model 1 with 15° mesial inclination, model 2 with upright posterior teeth, and model 3 with 10° distal inclination. A total of 12 en-masse retraction aligner models with varying posterior antitipping designs (0°, 1°, 2°, and 3°) were constructed to simulate space closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From models 1 to 3: Sagittally, posterior teeth increased mesial crown movement but decreased distal root movement; vertically, posterior teeth reduced crown intrusion but enhanced root intrusion; the posterior rotation center shifted distally and apically. Horizontally, model 3 indicated the greatest mesiolingual rotation of posterior teeth across all models. For anterior teeth, model 1 exhibited the most incisor retraction and lingual tipping, whereas model 3 displayed the least incisor retraction and lingual tipping. In addition, the progressive posterior antitipping design gradually diminished both the mesial tipping of posterior teeth and the lingual tipping of anterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different mesiodistal inclinations of posterior teeth had various biomechanical effects in 3 dimensions during space closure. Careful consideration should be given to the mesiodistal angulation of posterior teeth during extraction space closure with aligners.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical effects of different initial posterior inclinations during extraction space closure with clear aligners: A finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yiru Jiang, Jue Wang, Lingling Hu, Xiaoyan Chen, Xiaoxia Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.04.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different initial mesiodistal inclinations of posterior teeth during extraction space closure using clear aligner treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three different finite element models were developed for first premolar extractions, each representing different initial mesiodistal inclinations of the posterior teeth: model 1 with 15° mesial inclination, model 2 with upright posterior teeth, and model 3 with 10° distal inclination. A total of 12 en-masse retraction aligner models with varying posterior antitipping designs (0°, 1°, 2°, and 3°) were constructed to simulate space closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From models 1 to 3: Sagittally, posterior teeth increased mesial crown movement but decreased distal root movement; vertically, posterior teeth reduced crown intrusion but enhanced root intrusion; the posterior rotation center shifted distally and apically. Horizontally, model 3 indicated the greatest mesiolingual rotation of posterior teeth across all models. For anterior teeth, model 1 exhibited the most incisor retraction and lingual tipping, whereas model 3 displayed the least incisor retraction and lingual tipping. In addition, the progressive posterior antitipping design gradually diminished both the mesial tipping of posterior teeth and the lingual tipping of anterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different mesiodistal inclinations of posterior teeth had various biomechanical effects in 3 dimensions during space closure. Careful consideration should be given to the mesiodistal angulation of posterior teeth during extraction space closure with aligners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.04.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.04.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanical effects of different initial posterior inclinations during extraction space closure with clear aligners: A finite element analysis.
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different initial mesiodistal inclinations of posterior teeth during extraction space closure using clear aligner treatment.
Methods: Three different finite element models were developed for first premolar extractions, each representing different initial mesiodistal inclinations of the posterior teeth: model 1 with 15° mesial inclination, model 2 with upright posterior teeth, and model 3 with 10° distal inclination. A total of 12 en-masse retraction aligner models with varying posterior antitipping designs (0°, 1°, 2°, and 3°) were constructed to simulate space closure.
Results: From models 1 to 3: Sagittally, posterior teeth increased mesial crown movement but decreased distal root movement; vertically, posterior teeth reduced crown intrusion but enhanced root intrusion; the posterior rotation center shifted distally and apically. Horizontally, model 3 indicated the greatest mesiolingual rotation of posterior teeth across all models. For anterior teeth, model 1 exhibited the most incisor retraction and lingual tipping, whereas model 3 displayed the least incisor retraction and lingual tipping. In addition, the progressive posterior antitipping design gradually diminished both the mesial tipping of posterior teeth and the lingual tipping of anterior teeth.
Conclusions: Different mesiodistal inclinations of posterior teeth had various biomechanical effects in 3 dimensions during space closure. Careful consideration should be given to the mesiodistal angulation of posterior teeth during extraction space closure with aligners.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.