Ricardo Picoito, Tânia Manuel, Sofia Vieira, Rita Azevedo, Elisabete Nunes, Paulo Alves
{"title":"重症监护病房成人压力损伤风险评估的建议和最佳实践:范围审查。","authors":"Ricardo Picoito, Tânia Manuel, Sofia Vieira, Rita Azevedo, Elisabete Nunes, Paulo Alves","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15040128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: The prevention of pressure injuries depends on the early and correct assessment of at-risk patients. Since risk assessment involves more than using a risk factor instrument, we intend to map the existing recommendations and statements of good practice for pressure injury risk assessment in adults admitted to intensive care units, as well as identify the strengths of the evidence and recommendations in the literature. <b>Methods</b>: This study is a scoping review, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted as a guide for writing this study. <b>Results</b>: Searches were carried out in six databases, resulting in 794 studies, of which 15 were included. The recommendations and statements of good practice were grouped into five categories: risk assessment instruments, skin assessment, medical device surveillance, other alternatives to risk assessment, and implementing best practices in clinical settings. The strengths of the evidence and recommendations were identified when available in the literature. <i>Conclusions</i>: The mapping showed that the evidence is sufficient to indicate recommendations and statements of good practice for the risk assessment of pressure injuries in adults admitted to intensive care units. The protocol was retrospectively registered in the Open Science Framework on the 4th of August of 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations and Best Practices for the Risk Assessment of Pressure Injuries in Adults Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Picoito, Tânia Manuel, Sofia Vieira, Rita Azevedo, Elisabete Nunes, Paulo Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15040128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>: The prevention of pressure injuries depends on the early and correct assessment of at-risk patients. Since risk assessment involves more than using a risk factor instrument, we intend to map the existing recommendations and statements of good practice for pressure injury risk assessment in adults admitted to intensive care units, as well as identify the strengths of the evidence and recommendations in the literature. <b>Methods</b>: This study is a scoping review, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted as a guide for writing this study. <b>Results</b>: Searches were carried out in six databases, resulting in 794 studies, of which 15 were included. The recommendations and statements of good practice were grouped into five categories: risk assessment instruments, skin assessment, medical device surveillance, other alternatives to risk assessment, and implementing best practices in clinical settings. The strengths of the evidence and recommendations were identified when available in the literature. <i>Conclusions</i>: The mapping showed that the evidence is sufficient to indicate recommendations and statements of good practice for the risk assessment of pressure injuries in adults admitted to intensive care units. The protocol was retrospectively registered in the Open Science Framework on the 4th of August of 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029825/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recommendations and Best Practices for the Risk Assessment of Pressure Injuries in Adults Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.
Background: The prevention of pressure injuries depends on the early and correct assessment of at-risk patients. Since risk assessment involves more than using a risk factor instrument, we intend to map the existing recommendations and statements of good practice for pressure injury risk assessment in adults admitted to intensive care units, as well as identify the strengths of the evidence and recommendations in the literature. Methods: This study is a scoping review, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted as a guide for writing this study. Results: Searches were carried out in six databases, resulting in 794 studies, of which 15 were included. The recommendations and statements of good practice were grouped into five categories: risk assessment instruments, skin assessment, medical device surveillance, other alternatives to risk assessment, and implementing best practices in clinical settings. The strengths of the evidence and recommendations were identified when available in the literature. Conclusions: The mapping showed that the evidence is sufficient to indicate recommendations and statements of good practice for the risk assessment of pressure injuries in adults admitted to intensive care units. The protocol was retrospectively registered in the Open Science Framework on the 4th of August of 2023.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.