照顾者对儿童家庭气道正压治疗的优先结果:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vanessa C Dannenberg, Daniel Ofosu, Ella Milne, Deborah L Olmstead, Mathieu Chalifour, Shannon Scott, Maria L Castro-Codesal
{"title":"照顾者对儿童家庭气道正压治疗的优先结果:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Vanessa C Dannenberg, Daniel Ofosu, Ella Milne, Deborah L Olmstead, Mathieu Chalifour, Shannon Scott, Maria L Castro-Codesal","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>We sought to determine caregiver-reported priorities regarding the benefits, challenges, and further insights on home positive airway pressure (PAP) for children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With this mixed-methods study we analyzed responses to an online survey by parents/caregivers of children (< 18 years of age) using home PAP for at least 3 months. A semistructured anonymous survey comprising multiple-choice and open-ended questions was used to assess caregivers' priorities for PAP outcomes and their perspectives on future research directions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize caregiver and children demographics, as well as responses to multiple-choice questions. Thematic analysis was employed to synthesize the qualitative data from open-endend responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three caregivers completed the survey, 82% of whom were mothers. Over 90% rated improved sleep, rest, daytime energy levels, and breathing during sleep as very important or important benefits of PAP. A commonly reported challenge was children becoming dependent on PAP for sleep, which 76% of caregivers rated as a very important or important concern. For research priorities, improved breathing during sleep (77%) and reduced frequency of respiratory illness (73%) were the most commonly endorsed benefits. Key challenges identified as research priorities included mask-related issues (72%) and PAP dependency (57%). Four themes emerged from open-ended questions: (1) better nights and days, (2) adapting to home PAP, (3) finding the right mask, and (4) the importance of a team approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers identified both well-established respiratory benefits of PAP-such as improved breathing-and less frequently reported non-respiratory outcomes, including broader family well-being. Challenges such as mask-related issues and PAP dependency highlight areas where further research is needed.</p><p><strong>Citation: </strong>Dannenberg VC, Ofosu D, Milne E, et al. Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study. <i>J Clin Sleep Med.</i> 2025;21(8):1407-1415.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1407-1415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa C Dannenberg, Daniel Ofosu, Ella Milne, Deborah L Olmstead, Mathieu Chalifour, Shannon Scott, Maria L Castro-Codesal\",\"doi\":\"10.5664/jcsm.11708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>We sought to determine caregiver-reported priorities regarding the benefits, challenges, and further insights on home positive airway pressure (PAP) for children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With this mixed-methods study we analyzed responses to an online survey by parents/caregivers of children (< 18 years of age) using home PAP for at least 3 months. A semistructured anonymous survey comprising multiple-choice and open-ended questions was used to assess caregivers' priorities for PAP outcomes and their perspectives on future research directions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize caregiver and children demographics, as well as responses to multiple-choice questions. Thematic analysis was employed to synthesize the qualitative data from open-endend responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three caregivers completed the survey, 82% of whom were mothers. Over 90% rated improved sleep, rest, daytime energy levels, and breathing during sleep as very important or important benefits of PAP. A commonly reported challenge was children becoming dependent on PAP for sleep, which 76% of caregivers rated as a very important or important concern. For research priorities, improved breathing during sleep (77%) and reduced frequency of respiratory illness (73%) were the most commonly endorsed benefits. Key challenges identified as research priorities included mask-related issues (72%) and PAP dependency (57%). Four themes emerged from open-ended questions: (1) better nights and days, (2) adapting to home PAP, (3) finding the right mask, and (4) the importance of a team approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers identified both well-established respiratory benefits of PAP-such as improved breathing-and less frequently reported non-respiratory outcomes, including broader family well-being. Challenges such as mask-related issues and PAP dependency highlight areas where further research is needed.</p><p><strong>Citation: </strong>Dannenberg VC, Ofosu D, Milne E, et al. Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study. <i>J Clin Sleep Med.</i> 2025;21(8):1407-1415.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1407-1415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:确定护理人员报告的关于儿童家庭气道正压通气(PAP)的益处、挑战和进一步见解的优先级。方法:采用混合方法对儿童父母/照顾者在线问卷调查结果进行分析。结果:73名照顾者完成了调查,其中82%为母亲。超过90%的人认为改善睡眠、休息、白天的能量水平和睡眠中的呼吸是PAP非常重要的好处。76%的护理人员认为,儿童依赖PAP入睡是非常重要的挑战。在研究重点中,改善睡眠呼吸(77%)和减少呼吸系统疾病的频率(73%)是PAP的首选益处。口罩相关问题(72%)和儿童依赖PAP(57%)被认为是研究的优先挑战。从开放式问题中产生了四个主题:1)更好的夜晚和白天,2)适应家庭PAP, 3)找到合适的口罩,以及4)团队合作的重要性。结论:护理人员对PAP的优先考虑包括该疗法已知的呼吸益处,如呼吸改善,但也有较少报道的非呼吸结果,这反映了整个家庭的益处。PAP需要进一步研究的潜在挑战应集中在口罩相关问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study.

Study objectives: We sought to determine caregiver-reported priorities regarding the benefits, challenges, and further insights on home positive airway pressure (PAP) for children.

Methods: With this mixed-methods study we analyzed responses to an online survey by parents/caregivers of children (< 18 years of age) using home PAP for at least 3 months. A semistructured anonymous survey comprising multiple-choice and open-ended questions was used to assess caregivers' priorities for PAP outcomes and their perspectives on future research directions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize caregiver and children demographics, as well as responses to multiple-choice questions. Thematic analysis was employed to synthesize the qualitative data from open-endend responses.

Results: Seventy-three caregivers completed the survey, 82% of whom were mothers. Over 90% rated improved sleep, rest, daytime energy levels, and breathing during sleep as very important or important benefits of PAP. A commonly reported challenge was children becoming dependent on PAP for sleep, which 76% of caregivers rated as a very important or important concern. For research priorities, improved breathing during sleep (77%) and reduced frequency of respiratory illness (73%) were the most commonly endorsed benefits. Key challenges identified as research priorities included mask-related issues (72%) and PAP dependency (57%). Four themes emerged from open-ended questions: (1) better nights and days, (2) adapting to home PAP, (3) finding the right mask, and (4) the importance of a team approach.

Conclusions: Caregivers identified both well-established respiratory benefits of PAP-such as improved breathing-and less frequently reported non-respiratory outcomes, including broader family well-being. Challenges such as mask-related issues and PAP dependency highlight areas where further research is needed.

Citation: Dannenberg VC, Ofosu D, Milne E, et al. Caregivers' outcome prioritization for home positive airway pressure in children: a mixed-methods study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(8):1407-1415.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信