{"title":"关系感知的过去、现在和未来。","authors":"Alon Hafri, Liuba Papeo","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What kind of information does perception represent, and in what format? How does perception interface with higher-level cognitive systems for thinking, reasoning, and language? Questions like these motivated Green and Hummel in their seminal 2006 article in <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (JEP:HPP)</i>, \"Familiar Interacting Object Pairs Are Perceptually Grouped.\" At first glance, the subject matter of Green and Hummel's article appears quite simple and mundane: actions like pouring coffee, cutting bread, or unlocking a door. Yet hidden at the core of such everyday routines are specific functional relationships between objects, such as a carafe and a mug, a knife and a loaf, or a key and a lock. Green and Hummel's article was a turning point in a long but sparse tradition of research that had considered such relations from a vision-science perspective (e.g., Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000; Ullman, 1984), as it steered many researchers-ourselves included-to explore questions in the burgeoning field now known as \"relation perception.\" This field advances the idea that, beyond objects, features, and locations, the visual system spontaneously or automatically extracts and represents relations-properties that specify interactions or connections between objects, rather than each object's individual characteristics. In this perspective article, we outline new aspects of human visual perception that have been the focus of this field and the major outstanding questions that remain (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 5","pages":"543-546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The past, present, and future of relation perception.\",\"authors\":\"Alon Hafri, Liuba Papeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>What kind of information does perception represent, and in what format? How does perception interface with higher-level cognitive systems for thinking, reasoning, and language? Questions like these motivated Green and Hummel in their seminal 2006 article in <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (JEP:HPP)</i>, \\\"Familiar Interacting Object Pairs Are Perceptually Grouped.\\\" At first glance, the subject matter of Green and Hummel's article appears quite simple and mundane: actions like pouring coffee, cutting bread, or unlocking a door. Yet hidden at the core of such everyday routines are specific functional relationships between objects, such as a carafe and a mug, a knife and a loaf, or a key and a lock. Green and Hummel's article was a turning point in a long but sparse tradition of research that had considered such relations from a vision-science perspective (e.g., Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000; Ullman, 1984), as it steered many researchers-ourselves included-to explore questions in the burgeoning field now known as \\\"relation perception.\\\" This field advances the idea that, beyond objects, features, and locations, the visual system spontaneously or automatically extracts and represents relations-properties that specify interactions or connections between objects, rather than each object's individual characteristics. In this perspective article, we outline new aspects of human visual perception that have been the focus of this field and the major outstanding questions that remain (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"volume\":\"51 5\",\"pages\":\"543-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
感知代表什么样的信息,以什么样的形式?感知是如何与思维、推理和语言的高级认知系统交互的?这些问题促使Green和Hummel在2006年《实验心理学杂志:人类感知和表现》(JEP:HPP)上发表了一篇开创性的文章《熟悉的相互作用的对象对在感知上分组》。乍一看,Green和Hummel文章的主题似乎非常简单和平凡:像倒咖啡、切面包或打开门这样的动作。然而,隐藏在这些日常生活的核心是物品之间特定的功能关系,比如玻璃瓶和杯子,刀和面包,或者钥匙和锁。Green和Hummel的文章是从视觉科学角度考虑这种关系的长期但稀疏的研究传统的转折点(例如,Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000;Ullman, 1984),因为它引导了许多研究人员——包括我们自己——探索现在被称为“关系感知”的新兴领域的问题。这个领域提出了这样一种观点,即除了物体、特征和位置之外,视觉系统自发或自动地提取和表示关系——指定物体之间的交互或联系的属性,而不是每个物体的个体特征。在这篇透视文章中,我们概述了人类视觉感知的新方面,这些方面一直是该领域的焦点,以及仍然存在的主要悬而未决的问题(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
The past, present, and future of relation perception.
What kind of information does perception represent, and in what format? How does perception interface with higher-level cognitive systems for thinking, reasoning, and language? Questions like these motivated Green and Hummel in their seminal 2006 article in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (JEP:HPP), "Familiar Interacting Object Pairs Are Perceptually Grouped." At first glance, the subject matter of Green and Hummel's article appears quite simple and mundane: actions like pouring coffee, cutting bread, or unlocking a door. Yet hidden at the core of such everyday routines are specific functional relationships between objects, such as a carafe and a mug, a knife and a loaf, or a key and a lock. Green and Hummel's article was a turning point in a long but sparse tradition of research that had considered such relations from a vision-science perspective (e.g., Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000; Ullman, 1984), as it steered many researchers-ourselves included-to explore questions in the burgeoning field now known as "relation perception." This field advances the idea that, beyond objects, features, and locations, the visual system spontaneously or automatically extracts and represents relations-properties that specify interactions or connections between objects, rather than each object's individual characteristics. In this perspective article, we outline new aspects of human visual perception that have been the focus of this field and the major outstanding questions that remain (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.