治疗期间正畸透明矫正器与传统固定矫治器的口腔健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nancy M Ajwa
{"title":"治疗期间正畸透明矫正器与传统固定矫治器的口腔健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Nancy M Ajwa","doi":"10.1177/09287329251326022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOrthodontic clear aligners are a technologically advanced treatment modality that improves aesthetics and comfort while impacting patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).ObjectiveThis study assessed and compared the OHRQoL of adult orthodontic patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances (metal and ceramic brackets) during orthodontic treatments.MethodologyOne hundred and five orthodontic patients were recruited and classified according to the treatment received. Group 1 clear aligners, group 2- fixed appliances/metal brackets, and Group 3-fixed appliances/ceramic brackets. The patients were surveyed using an Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP- 14) questionnaire before (T0), 1-week (T1), and 3-months (T2) after the start of orthodontic treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS software at a significance level set at ≤0.05.ResultsThe mean OHIP scores showed no significant difference between the 3 groups at T0 (p = 0.09) and T2 (p = 0.41) time intervals. On the contrary, the mean OHIP scores at T1 significantly differed between 3 groups (p = 0.03). The mean OHIP scores within the groups at different time intervals was significantly different. Multiple comparison within the groups showed significant reduction in the mean OHIP scores from T0 to T1 and T2 period and further from T1 to T2 period, and the mean differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).ConclusionAdult patients treated with clear aligners had significantly higher OHRQoL than those who underwent conventional fixed bracket-based treatment after 7 days of treatment but OHRQoL was similar after three months of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251326022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral health-related quality of life of orthodontic clear aligner versus conventional fixed appliance during treatment: A prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy M Ajwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251326022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundOrthodontic clear aligners are a technologically advanced treatment modality that improves aesthetics and comfort while impacting patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).ObjectiveThis study assessed and compared the OHRQoL of adult orthodontic patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances (metal and ceramic brackets) during orthodontic treatments.MethodologyOne hundred and five orthodontic patients were recruited and classified according to the treatment received. Group 1 clear aligners, group 2- fixed appliances/metal brackets, and Group 3-fixed appliances/ceramic brackets. The patients were surveyed using an Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP- 14) questionnaire before (T0), 1-week (T1), and 3-months (T2) after the start of orthodontic treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS software at a significance level set at ≤0.05.ResultsThe mean OHIP scores showed no significant difference between the 3 groups at T0 (p = 0.09) and T2 (p = 0.41) time intervals. On the contrary, the mean OHIP scores at T1 significantly differed between 3 groups (p = 0.03). The mean OHIP scores within the groups at different time intervals was significantly different. Multiple comparison within the groups showed significant reduction in the mean OHIP scores from T0 to T1 and T2 period and further from T1 to T2 period, and the mean differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).ConclusionAdult patients treated with clear aligners had significantly higher OHRQoL than those who underwent conventional fixed bracket-based treatment after 7 days of treatment but OHRQoL was similar after three months of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251326022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251326022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251326022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口腔清洁矫正器是一种技术先进的治疗方式,可以改善美观和舒适度,同时影响患者的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)。目的评价和比较成人正畸患者在正畸治疗过程中使用透明矫正器和固定器具(金属托槽和陶瓷托槽)的OHRQoL。方法选取105例正畸患者,根据所接受的治疗情况进行分类。第一组清净矫正器,第二组固定器具/金属托架,第三组固定器具/陶瓷托架。在开始正畸治疗前(T0)、1周(T1)和3个月(T2),使用阿拉伯语版口腔健康影响问卷14 (OHIP- 14)对患者进行调查。数据采用SPSS软件分析,显著性水平≤0.05。结果三组患者在T0 (p = 0.09)和T2 (p = 0.41)时间间隔的平均OHIP评分差异无统计学意义。相反,三组患者在T1时的平均OHIP评分差异有统计学意义(p = 0.03)。不同时间间隔组内平均OHIP评分差异有统计学意义。组内多次比较,T0至T1、T2期及T1至T2期平均OHIP评分均显著降低,平均差异均有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral health-related quality of life of orthodontic clear aligner versus conventional fixed appliance during treatment: A prospective cohort study.

BackgroundOrthodontic clear aligners are a technologically advanced treatment modality that improves aesthetics and comfort while impacting patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).ObjectiveThis study assessed and compared the OHRQoL of adult orthodontic patients receiving clear aligners and fixed appliances (metal and ceramic brackets) during orthodontic treatments.MethodologyOne hundred and five orthodontic patients were recruited and classified according to the treatment received. Group 1 clear aligners, group 2- fixed appliances/metal brackets, and Group 3-fixed appliances/ceramic brackets. The patients were surveyed using an Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP- 14) questionnaire before (T0), 1-week (T1), and 3-months (T2) after the start of orthodontic treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS software at a significance level set at ≤0.05.ResultsThe mean OHIP scores showed no significant difference between the 3 groups at T0 (p = 0.09) and T2 (p = 0.41) time intervals. On the contrary, the mean OHIP scores at T1 significantly differed between 3 groups (p = 0.03). The mean OHIP scores within the groups at different time intervals was significantly different. Multiple comparison within the groups showed significant reduction in the mean OHIP scores from T0 to T1 and T2 period and further from T1 to T2 period, and the mean differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).ConclusionAdult patients treated with clear aligners had significantly higher OHRQoL than those who underwent conventional fixed bracket-based treatment after 7 days of treatment but OHRQoL was similar after three months of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信