混合BOPPPS模式在放射学教育中的应用:以儿科本科生为例。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Wei-Qin Cheng, Ling He, Jin-Hua Cai, Xiao Fan
{"title":"混合BOPPPS模式在放射学教育中的应用:以儿科本科生为例。","authors":"Wei-Qin Cheng, Ling He, Jin-Hua Cai, Xiao Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07279-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the application effect of the hybrid BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary) teaching model in radiology education for five-year pediatric undergraduates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 418 students from Grade 2018 and 2019 majoring in Pediatrics of Chongqing Medical University were selected as the retrospective study objects. 213 undergraduates in Grade 2018 were included in the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) group, and 205 undergraduates in Grade 2019 were included in the hybrid BOPPPS group. The primary endpoint was the comprehensive grades, which combined formative assessment scores (40%) and final exam scores (60%). The teaching effectiveness was evaluated by the assessment and questionnaires of the two groups of students, adjusting for multiple comparisons in the questionnaires with Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the LBL group, the hybrid BOPPPS group demonstrated statistically significant yet modest improvements in formative assessment (median difference: + 1.25 points), final exam (+ 2.0 points) and comprehensive grades (+ 1.6 points) (all p < 0.05). Students preferred the BOPPPS model more than the LBL model in terms of course enthusiasm, language proficiency, diagnostic reasoning and imaging interpretation ability, and teacher-student interaction (all p < 0.00625 after Bonferroni correction). However, the difference in self-learning ability improvement became non-significant post-correction (p = 0.024 > 0.00625). There was no significant difference in study pressure between the two groups (p = 0.202). And the BOPPPS group showed significantly higher levels of overall course satisfaction and effectiveness compared to the LBL group (both p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hybrid BOPPPS model is likely an effective radiology teaching method for five‑year pediatric undergraduates, which is deserving of recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid BOPPPS model in radiology education: a case study of pediatric undergraduates.\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Qin Cheng, Ling He, Jin-Hua Cai, Xiao Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07279-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the application effect of the hybrid BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary) teaching model in radiology education for five-year pediatric undergraduates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 418 students from Grade 2018 and 2019 majoring in Pediatrics of Chongqing Medical University were selected as the retrospective study objects. 213 undergraduates in Grade 2018 were included in the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) group, and 205 undergraduates in Grade 2019 were included in the hybrid BOPPPS group. The primary endpoint was the comprehensive grades, which combined formative assessment scores (40%) and final exam scores (60%). The teaching effectiveness was evaluated by the assessment and questionnaires of the two groups of students, adjusting for multiple comparisons in the questionnaires with Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the LBL group, the hybrid BOPPPS group demonstrated statistically significant yet modest improvements in formative assessment (median difference: + 1.25 points), final exam (+ 2.0 points) and comprehensive grades (+ 1.6 points) (all p < 0.05). Students preferred the BOPPPS model more than the LBL model in terms of course enthusiasm, language proficiency, diagnostic reasoning and imaging interpretation ability, and teacher-student interaction (all p < 0.00625 after Bonferroni correction). However, the difference in self-learning ability improvement became non-significant post-correction (p = 0.024 > 0.00625). There was no significant difference in study pressure between the two groups (p = 0.202). And the BOPPPS group showed significantly higher levels of overall course satisfaction and effectiveness compared to the LBL group (both p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hybrid BOPPPS model is likely an effective radiology teaching method for five‑year pediatric undergraduates, which is deserving of recommendation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07279-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07279-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨BOPPPS混合型(桥接式、客观式、预评式、参与式、后评式、总结式)教学模式在五年制儿科本科放射学教学中的应用效果。方法:选取重庆医科大学2018级、2019级儿科学专业418名学生作为回顾性研究对象。2018级213名本科生被纳入传统的讲授式学习(LBL)组,2019级205名本科生被纳入混合式BOPPPS组。主要终点是综合成绩,包括形成性评估分数(40%)和期末考试分数(60%)。通过对两组学生的评估和问卷来评价教学效果,并对问卷进行Bonferroni修正后的多重比较进行调整。结果:与LBL组相比,混合BOPPPS组在形成性评估(中位差:+ 1.25分)、期末考试(+ 2.0分)和综合成绩(+ 1.6分)方面表现出统计学上显著但适度的改善(p均为0.00625)。两组患者的学习压力差异无统计学意义(p = 0.202)。结论:混合BOPPPS模式可能是一种有效的儿科五年制本科放射学教学方法,值得推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid BOPPPS model in radiology education: a case study of pediatric undergraduates.

Background: To explore the application effect of the hybrid BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary) teaching model in radiology education for five-year pediatric undergraduates.

Methods: A total of 418 students from Grade 2018 and 2019 majoring in Pediatrics of Chongqing Medical University were selected as the retrospective study objects. 213 undergraduates in Grade 2018 were included in the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) group, and 205 undergraduates in Grade 2019 were included in the hybrid BOPPPS group. The primary endpoint was the comprehensive grades, which combined formative assessment scores (40%) and final exam scores (60%). The teaching effectiveness was evaluated by the assessment and questionnaires of the two groups of students, adjusting for multiple comparisons in the questionnaires with Bonferroni correction.

Results: Compared to the LBL group, the hybrid BOPPPS group demonstrated statistically significant yet modest improvements in formative assessment (median difference: + 1.25 points), final exam (+ 2.0 points) and comprehensive grades (+ 1.6 points) (all p < 0.05). Students preferred the BOPPPS model more than the LBL model in terms of course enthusiasm, language proficiency, diagnostic reasoning and imaging interpretation ability, and teacher-student interaction (all p < 0.00625 after Bonferroni correction). However, the difference in self-learning ability improvement became non-significant post-correction (p = 0.024 > 0.00625). There was no significant difference in study pressure between the two groups (p = 0.202). And the BOPPPS group showed significantly higher levels of overall course satisfaction and effectiveness compared to the LBL group (both p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The hybrid BOPPPS model is likely an effective radiology teaching method for five‑year pediatric undergraduates, which is deserving of recommendation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信