复杂单绒毛膜妊娠选择性终止胎儿后的围产期结局:来自西班牙南部转诊中心的经验。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Melisa De Pauli, Pilar Carretero Lucena, Andrea Samper Girona, Olga Ocón Hernández, José Alejandro Ávila Cabreja, Francisca Sonia Molina
{"title":"复杂单绒毛膜妊娠选择性终止胎儿后的围产期结局:来自西班牙南部转诊中心的经验。","authors":"Melisa De Pauli, Pilar Carretero Lucena, Andrea Samper Girona, Olga Ocón Hernández, José Alejandro Ávila Cabreja, Francisca Sonia Molina","doi":"10.1017/thg.2025.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to to describe perinatal outcomes in monochorionic twin pregnancies after selective fetal reduction using bipolar cord coagulation (BCC) or interstitial laser ablation (ILA). This retrospective cohort study included monochorionic twin pregnancies requiring selective fetal reduction between 2008 and 2023 at a referral center in Spain. Maternal and perinatal data were collected and analyzed to compare outcomes between BCC and ILA techniques. The primary outcome was the survival of the co-twin, while secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, the incidence of PPROM, birth weight and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Eighty-four procedures were performed (30 ILA, 54 BCC). The overall co-twin survival rate was 80%, with BCC showing a higher survival rate (87%) compared to ILA (67%, <i>p</i> = .026). Fetal death before 24 weeks was more common in ILA (30%) than BCC (7.4%, <i>p</i> = .010). The mean gestational age at delivery was lower in BCC (36.6 weeks) than ILA (38.6 weeks, <i>p</i> = .021), and preterm delivery was more frequent in BCC (50%) compared to ILA (14%, <i>p</i> = .005). BCC seems to have a better overall survival than ILA in complicated monochorionic twins' selective terminations. However, we could not clarify whether this difference was due to the technique itself or the different gestational age at the time of the procedure as well as the specific indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal Outcomes Following Selective Fetal Terminations of Complicated Monochorionic Pregnancies: Experience From a Referral Center in Southern Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Melisa De Pauli, Pilar Carretero Lucena, Andrea Samper Girona, Olga Ocón Hernández, José Alejandro Ávila Cabreja, Francisca Sonia Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/thg.2025.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to to describe perinatal outcomes in monochorionic twin pregnancies after selective fetal reduction using bipolar cord coagulation (BCC) or interstitial laser ablation (ILA). This retrospective cohort study included monochorionic twin pregnancies requiring selective fetal reduction between 2008 and 2023 at a referral center in Spain. Maternal and perinatal data were collected and analyzed to compare outcomes between BCC and ILA techniques. The primary outcome was the survival of the co-twin, while secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, the incidence of PPROM, birth weight and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Eighty-four procedures were performed (30 ILA, 54 BCC). The overall co-twin survival rate was 80%, with BCC showing a higher survival rate (87%) compared to ILA (67%, <i>p</i> = .026). Fetal death before 24 weeks was more common in ILA (30%) than BCC (7.4%, <i>p</i> = .010). The mean gestational age at delivery was lower in BCC (36.6 weeks) than ILA (38.6 weeks, <i>p</i> = .021), and preterm delivery was more frequent in BCC (50%) compared to ILA (14%, <i>p</i> = .005). BCC seems to have a better overall survival than ILA in complicated monochorionic twins' selective terminations. However, we could not clarify whether this difference was due to the technique itself or the different gestational age at the time of the procedure as well as the specific indication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2025.16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2025.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述单绒毛膜双胎妊娠采用双极脐带凝血(BCC)或间质激光消融(ILA)选择性胎位减少后的围产期结局。这项回顾性队列研究包括2008年至2023年在西班牙转诊中心需要选择性减少胎儿数量的单绒毛膜双胎妊娠。收集和分析孕产妇和围产期数据,比较BCC和ILA技术的结果。主要结局是同卵双胞胎的生存,次要结局包括分娩时胎龄、PPROM发生率、出生体重和长期神经发育结局。84例手术(30例ILA, 54例BCC)。总体双胎生存率为80%,BCC的生存率(87%)高于ILA (67%, p = 0.026)。24周前胎儿死亡在ILA(30%)比BCC (7.4%, p = 0.010)更常见。BCC组的平均胎龄(36.6周)低于ILA组(38.6周,p = 0.021), BCC组的早产发生率(50%)高于ILA组(14%,p = 0.005)。在复杂的单绒毛膜双胞胎选择性终止中,BCC似乎比ILA有更好的总生存率。然而,我们无法明确这种差异是由于技术本身还是由于手术时胎龄的不同以及具体的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perinatal Outcomes Following Selective Fetal Terminations of Complicated Monochorionic Pregnancies: Experience From a Referral Center in Southern Spain.

The objective of this study was to to describe perinatal outcomes in monochorionic twin pregnancies after selective fetal reduction using bipolar cord coagulation (BCC) or interstitial laser ablation (ILA). This retrospective cohort study included monochorionic twin pregnancies requiring selective fetal reduction between 2008 and 2023 at a referral center in Spain. Maternal and perinatal data were collected and analyzed to compare outcomes between BCC and ILA techniques. The primary outcome was the survival of the co-twin, while secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, the incidence of PPROM, birth weight and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Eighty-four procedures were performed (30 ILA, 54 BCC). The overall co-twin survival rate was 80%, with BCC showing a higher survival rate (87%) compared to ILA (67%, p = .026). Fetal death before 24 weeks was more common in ILA (30%) than BCC (7.4%, p = .010). The mean gestational age at delivery was lower in BCC (36.6 weeks) than ILA (38.6 weeks, p = .021), and preterm delivery was more frequent in BCC (50%) compared to ILA (14%, p = .005). BCC seems to have a better overall survival than ILA in complicated monochorionic twins' selective terminations. However, we could not clarify whether this difference was due to the technique itself or the different gestational age at the time of the procedure as well as the specific indication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Twin Research and Human Genetics 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics. Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信