低剂量与高剂量甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌肺炎的比较。

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.64
Bradley Taranto, Lynn C Wardlow, Kelci Coe, Jose A Bazan, Jessica Leininger
{"title":"低剂量与高剂量甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌肺炎的比较。","authors":"Bradley Taranto, Lynn C Wardlow, Kelci Coe, Jose A Bazan, Jessica Leininger","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of patients treated with low-dose (LD) versus high-dose (HD) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large academic tertiary-care center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Hospitalized adult patients who received at least 8 mg/kg/day of TMP-SMX for at least 96 hours for treatment of <i>S. maltophilia</i> pneumonia between October 2012 and September 2022. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with pneumonia based on clinical and radiographic findings at the time of initiation of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was clinical success at the end of therapy among patients treated with LD (8-12 mg/kg/day) versus HD (>12 mg/kg/day) TMP-SMX. Secondary outcomes included microbiological success, all-cause and infection-related inpatient mortality, infection recurrence, development of TMP-SMX resistance, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients were included (LD, <i>n</i> = 20 versus HD, <i>n</i> = 75). There was no difference in the primary outcome of clinical success at the end of therapy between groups (LD 57% versus HD 65%, <i>P</i> = 0.53). Secondary outcomes, including inpatient infection-related mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.56), AKI (<i>P</i> = 0.61), and hyperkalemia (<i>P</i> = 0.34) also did not differ significantly between the LD and HD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No differences in clinical success or adverse events were observed in patients with <i>S. maltophilia</i> pneumonia treated with either LD or HD TMP-SMX.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low- versus high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Bradley Taranto, Lynn C Wardlow, Kelci Coe, Jose A Bazan, Jessica Leininger\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of patients treated with low-dose (LD) versus high-dose (HD) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large academic tertiary-care center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Hospitalized adult patients who received at least 8 mg/kg/day of TMP-SMX for at least 96 hours for treatment of <i>S. maltophilia</i> pneumonia between October 2012 and September 2022. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with pneumonia based on clinical and radiographic findings at the time of initiation of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was clinical success at the end of therapy among patients treated with LD (8-12 mg/kg/day) versus HD (>12 mg/kg/day) TMP-SMX. Secondary outcomes included microbiological success, all-cause and infection-related inpatient mortality, infection recurrence, development of TMP-SMX resistance, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients were included (LD, <i>n</i> = 20 versus HD, <i>n</i> = 75). There was no difference in the primary outcome of clinical success at the end of therapy between groups (LD 57% versus HD 65%, <i>P</i> = 0.53). Secondary outcomes, including inpatient infection-related mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.56), AKI (<i>P</i> = 0.61), and hyperkalemia (<i>P</i> = 0.34) also did not differ significantly between the LD and HD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No differences in clinical success or adverse events were observed in patients with <i>S. maltophilia</i> pneumonia treated with either LD or HD TMP-SMX.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较低剂量(LD)与高剂量(HD)甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)治疗嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌性肺炎的疗效。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:大型学术三级护理中心。患者:2012年10月至2022年9月期间接受至少8mg /kg/天的TMP-SMX治疗至少96小时的住院成年患者,用于治疗嗜麦芽链球菌肺炎。如果患者在开始使用抗生素时根据临床和放射学检查结果诊断为肺炎,则纳入研究。方法:主要结局是治疗结束时LD (8- 12mg /kg/天)与HD (bb0 - 12mg /kg/天)TMP-SMX治疗患者的临床成功。次要结局包括微生物学方面的成功、全因和感染相关的住院患者死亡率、感染复发、TMP-SMX耐药性的发展、急性肾损伤(AKI)和高钾血症的发生率。结果:纳入95例患者(LD, n = 20, HD, n = 75)。两组治疗结束时临床成功的主要转归无差异(LD 57% vs HD 65%, P = 0.53)。次要结局,包括住院患者感染相关死亡率(P = 0.56)、AKI (P = 0.61)和高钾血症(P = 0.34),在LD组和HD组之间也没有显著差异。结论:LD和HD TMP-SMX治疗在嗜麦芽链球菌肺炎患者的临床成功率和不良事件方面均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low- versus high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia.

Objective: To compare outcomes of patients treated with low-dose (LD) versus high-dose (HD) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Large academic tertiary-care center.

Patients: Hospitalized adult patients who received at least 8 mg/kg/day of TMP-SMX for at least 96 hours for treatment of S. maltophilia pneumonia between October 2012 and September 2022. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with pneumonia based on clinical and radiographic findings at the time of initiation of antibiotics.

Methods: The primary outcome was clinical success at the end of therapy among patients treated with LD (8-12 mg/kg/day) versus HD (>12 mg/kg/day) TMP-SMX. Secondary outcomes included microbiological success, all-cause and infection-related inpatient mortality, infection recurrence, development of TMP-SMX resistance, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia.

Results: 95 patients were included (LD, n = 20 versus HD, n = 75). There was no difference in the primary outcome of clinical success at the end of therapy between groups (LD 57% versus HD 65%, P = 0.53). Secondary outcomes, including inpatient infection-related mortality (P = 0.56), AKI (P = 0.61), and hyperkalemia (P = 0.34) also did not differ significantly between the LD and HD groups.

Conclusions: No differences in clinical success or adverse events were observed in patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia treated with either LD or HD TMP-SMX.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信