P Ambili Ravindran, Rohit Raghavan, Kiran Christopher, Sethu Sramadathil, Ann George, Athira Kattachirakunnel Sasi
{"title":"牙-种植体、种植体-种植体和牙-牙支撑修复体的副功能载荷应力分布:三维有限元比较分析。","authors":"P Ambili Ravindran, Rohit Raghavan, Kiran Christopher, Sethu Sramadathil, Ann George, Athira Kattachirakunnel Sasi","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_30_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study's objective was to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth-implant, implant-implant, and tooth-tooth supported prostheses under parafunctional loading in axial and oblique directions employing a 3D finite element analysis in the mandibular posterior region which had D3 bone (porous cortical bone and fine trabecular bone).</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>In vitro study, Finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Meterials and methods: </strong>Cone-beam computed tomography data was used by Mimics software (Materialize Mimics 19) to create a three-dimensional finite element simulation of the jaw. Solid Works 2018 (Dassault Systems) was used to produce a geometric 3D model of the three systems. Each model consisted of a bone, an implant, and teeth (Model I tooth-tooth supported, Model II tooth-implant supported and Model III implant-implant supported). The three models' geometrical models were transferred to Ansys Workbench (19.2 software) for the analysis portion. A load that mimicked masticatory force was delivered in both axial and oblique directions.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>In the present study, statistical analysis was not required because 3D finite element analysis uses deterministic numerical methods to simulate physical behavior and stress distribution patterns.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The results demonstrated that under the parafunctional combined loading process, the implant- implant supported prosthesis showed significantly higher stress concentrations in the bone. It was found that the cortical bone around the crestal region had the highest stresses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the constraints of this investigation, we could draw the following conclusion: Of the three models, the tooth-tooth supported prosthesis exhibited the least amount of stress distribution, which was also least when functional loading was applied in the axial direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"24 4","pages":"391-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress distribution by parafunctional loading on tooth-implant, implant-implant, and tooth-tooth-supported prosthesis: A comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"P Ambili Ravindran, Rohit Raghavan, Kiran Christopher, Sethu Sramadathil, Ann George, Athira Kattachirakunnel Sasi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_30_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study's objective was to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth-implant, implant-implant, and tooth-tooth supported prostheses under parafunctional loading in axial and oblique directions employing a 3D finite element analysis in the mandibular posterior region which had D3 bone (porous cortical bone and fine trabecular bone).</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>In vitro study, Finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Meterials and methods: </strong>Cone-beam computed tomography data was used by Mimics software (Materialize Mimics 19) to create a three-dimensional finite element simulation of the jaw. Solid Works 2018 (Dassault Systems) was used to produce a geometric 3D model of the three systems. Each model consisted of a bone, an implant, and teeth (Model I tooth-tooth supported, Model II tooth-implant supported and Model III implant-implant supported). The three models' geometrical models were transferred to Ansys Workbench (19.2 software) for the analysis portion. A load that mimicked masticatory force was delivered in both axial and oblique directions.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>In the present study, statistical analysis was not required because 3D finite element analysis uses deterministic numerical methods to simulate physical behavior and stress distribution patterns.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The results demonstrated that under the parafunctional combined loading process, the implant- implant supported prosthesis showed significantly higher stress concentrations in the bone. It was found that the cortical bone around the crestal region had the highest stresses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the constraints of this investigation, we could draw the following conclusion: Of the three models, the tooth-tooth supported prosthesis exhibited the least amount of stress distribution, which was also least when functional loading was applied in the axial direction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"391-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_30_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_30_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过三维有限元分析具有D3骨(多孔皮质骨和细骨小梁骨)的下颌后区,评估牙-种植体、种植体-种植体和牙-牙支撑型假体在轴向和斜向副功能载荷下的应力分布。设置与设计:体外实验,有限元分析。材料和方法:使用Mimics软件(Materialize Mimics 19)使用锥束计算机断层扫描数据创建颌骨的三维有限元模拟。Solid Works 2018(达索系统)用于生成三个系统的几何3D模型。每个模型由骨、种植体和牙齿组成(模型I牙齿-牙齿支撑,模型II牙齿-种植体支撑,模型III种植体-种植体支撑)。将三个模型的几何模型转移到Ansys Workbench(19.2软件)中进行分析部分。在轴向和斜向上施加模拟咀嚼力的负荷。采用统计分析:在本研究中,由于三维有限元分析使用确定性数值方法来模拟物理行为和应力分布模式,因此不需要进行统计分析。结果:结果表明,在副功能联合加载过程中,种植体-种植体支持的假体在骨内表现出明显较高的应力浓度。结果发现,嵴区周围的皮质骨应力最大。结论:在本研究的约束下,我们可以得出以下结论:在三种模型中,牙-牙支撑修复体的应力分布最小,在轴向施加功能载荷时应力分布最小。
Stress distribution by parafunctional loading on tooth-implant, implant-implant, and tooth-tooth-supported prosthesis: A comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aim: The study's objective was to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth-implant, implant-implant, and tooth-tooth supported prostheses under parafunctional loading in axial and oblique directions employing a 3D finite element analysis in the mandibular posterior region which had D3 bone (porous cortical bone and fine trabecular bone).
Setting and design: In vitro study, Finite element analysis.
Meterials and methods: Cone-beam computed tomography data was used by Mimics software (Materialize Mimics 19) to create a three-dimensional finite element simulation of the jaw. Solid Works 2018 (Dassault Systems) was used to produce a geometric 3D model of the three systems. Each model consisted of a bone, an implant, and teeth (Model I tooth-tooth supported, Model II tooth-implant supported and Model III implant-implant supported). The three models' geometrical models were transferred to Ansys Workbench (19.2 software) for the analysis portion. A load that mimicked masticatory force was delivered in both axial and oblique directions.
Statistical analysis used: In the present study, statistical analysis was not required because 3D finite element analysis uses deterministic numerical methods to simulate physical behavior and stress distribution patterns.
Result: The results demonstrated that under the parafunctional combined loading process, the implant- implant supported prosthesis showed significantly higher stress concentrations in the bone. It was found that the cortical bone around the crestal region had the highest stresses.
Conclusion: Within the constraints of this investigation, we could draw the following conclusion: Of the three models, the tooth-tooth supported prosthesis exhibited the least amount of stress distribution, which was also least when functional loading was applied in the axial direction.