Mahmut Kalem, Kamil Balaban, Hakan Kocaoğlu, Peri Kından, Ercan Şahin
{"title":"评估ChatGPT对患者踝关节融合常见问题的反应。","authors":"Mahmut Kalem, Kamil Balaban, Hakan Kocaoğlu, Peri Kından, Ercan Şahin","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study assessed the quality and readability of responses given by ChatGPT to common patient questions about ankle fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five frequently asked questions about ankle fusion were queried to ChatGPT 4.0 individually, and responses were assessed using the accuracy score developed by Mika et al. and the DISCERN tool. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning Fog, Coleman-Liau, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT's responses were generally of acceptable quality, with a mean accuracy score of 2, indicating that the overall responses were satisfactory and required minimal clarification, along with a DISCERN score of 49.78, which is considered fair. However, the readability level was high, with a mean of 11.6 grade level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT showed promise as a resource for answering common patient questions about ankle fusion, providing mostly valid information. However, a high reading level was necessary to understand the response given.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of ChatGPT responses to common patient questions on ankle fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Mahmut Kalem, Kamil Balaban, Hakan Kocaoğlu, Peri Kından, Ercan Şahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study assessed the quality and readability of responses given by ChatGPT to common patient questions about ankle fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five frequently asked questions about ankle fusion were queried to ChatGPT 4.0 individually, and responses were assessed using the accuracy score developed by Mika et al. and the DISCERN tool. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning Fog, Coleman-Liau, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT's responses were generally of acceptable quality, with a mean accuracy score of 2, indicating that the overall responses were satisfactory and required minimal clarification, along with a DISCERN score of 49.78, which is considered fair. However, the readability level was high, with a mean of 11.6 grade level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT showed promise as a resource for answering common patient questions about ankle fusion, providing mostly valid information. However, a high reading level was necessary to understand the response given.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>N/A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of ChatGPT responses to common patient questions on ankle fusion.
Background: The study assessed the quality and readability of responses given by ChatGPT to common patient questions about ankle fusion.
Methods: Twenty-five frequently asked questions about ankle fusion were queried to ChatGPT 4.0 individually, and responses were assessed using the accuracy score developed by Mika et al. and the DISCERN tool. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning Fog, Coleman-Liau, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook indexes.
Results: ChatGPT's responses were generally of acceptable quality, with a mean accuracy score of 2, indicating that the overall responses were satisfactory and required minimal clarification, along with a DISCERN score of 49.78, which is considered fair. However, the readability level was high, with a mean of 11.6 grade level.
Conclusions: ChatGPT showed promise as a resource for answering common patient questions about ankle fusion, providing mostly valid information. However, a high reading level was necessary to understand the response given.
期刊介绍：
Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society.
The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
