全水果与100%果汁:重新审视证据及其对美国健康饮食建议的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hemangi B Mavadiya, Dahyun Roh, Andrew Ly, Yunxia Lu
{"title":"全水果与100%果汁:重新审视证据及其对美国健康饮食建议的影响。","authors":"Hemangi B Mavadiya, Dahyun Roh, Andrew Ly, Yunxia Lu","doi":"10.1111/nbu.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific literature remains inconsistent on whether and to what extent 100% fruit juice should be recommended in the diet. Specifically, the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) do not specifically refer to free sugars in fruit juice, and further clarification to provide more explicit guidance may be needed in the 2025-2030 version. We compared evidence on whole fruit and 100% fruit juice regarding its nutrient composition, impact on hunger and satiety, and association with chronic health conditions while highlighting the potential public health perspectives and implications for healthy dietary recommendations. Processing and/or storing 100% fruit juice reduces its fibre, vitamins and other antioxidant contents and transforms intrinsic sugars in the whole fruit into free sugars. Fruit consumed in solid form provides greater satiety due to delayed gastric emptying and related physiological reactions. The synergistic effects of polyphenols and fibre in whole fruit benefit the gut microbiome by acting as prebiotics and producing short-chain fatty acids that reduce inflammation. Although the evidence surrounding 100% fruit juice on chronic conditions remains inconsistent, accumulating studies indicate a more consistently beneficial role of whole fruits. The research evidence reviewed highlights the need for the DGA to update the recommendations on fruit juice, including emphasising the health benefits of whole fruit over fruit juice, providing a clear guideline on the daily fruit juice allowance, defining \"free sugars\" in fruit juice, and clarifying the distinction between 100% fruit juice and fruit drinks.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole Fruits Versus 100% Fruit Juice: Revisiting the Evidence and Its Implications for US Healthy Dietary Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Hemangi B Mavadiya, Dahyun Roh, Andrew Ly, Yunxia Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nbu.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Scientific literature remains inconsistent on whether and to what extent 100% fruit juice should be recommended in the diet. Specifically, the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) do not specifically refer to free sugars in fruit juice, and further clarification to provide more explicit guidance may be needed in the 2025-2030 version. We compared evidence on whole fruit and 100% fruit juice regarding its nutrient composition, impact on hunger and satiety, and association with chronic health conditions while highlighting the potential public health perspectives and implications for healthy dietary recommendations. Processing and/or storing 100% fruit juice reduces its fibre, vitamins and other antioxidant contents and transforms intrinsic sugars in the whole fruit into free sugars. Fruit consumed in solid form provides greater satiety due to delayed gastric emptying and related physiological reactions. The synergistic effects of polyphenols and fibre in whole fruit benefit the gut microbiome by acting as prebiotics and producing short-chain fatty acids that reduce inflammation. Although the evidence surrounding 100% fruit juice on chronic conditions remains inconsistent, accumulating studies indicate a more consistently beneficial role of whole fruits. The research evidence reviewed highlights the need for the DGA to update the recommendations on fruit juice, including emphasising the health benefits of whole fruit over fruit juice, providing a clear guideline on the daily fruit juice allowance, defining \\\"free sugars\\\" in fruit juice, and clarifying the distinction between 100% fruit juice and fruit drinks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于饮食中是否应该推荐100%果汁,以及在多大程度上推荐果汁,科学文献仍然不一致。具体来说,目前的《美国人膳食指南》(DGA)并没有特别提到果汁中的游离糖,可能需要在2025-2030年版本中进一步澄清以提供更明确的指导。我们比较了全水果和100%果汁的营养成分、对饥饿感和饱腹感的影响以及与慢性健康状况的关系,同时强调了潜在的公共卫生观点和对健康饮食建议的影响。加工和/或储存100%果汁会减少其纤维、维生素和其他抗氧化剂的含量,并将整个水果中的固有糖转化为游离糖。由于胃排空延迟和相关的生理反应,以固体形式食用的水果提供了更大的饱腹感。整个水果中的多酚和纤维的协同作用通过充当益生元和产生减少炎症的短链脂肪酸而有益于肠道微生物群。尽管100%果汁对慢性疾病的疗效仍不一致,但越来越多的研究表明,整个水果的有益作用更为一致。审查的研究证据强调了DGA需要更新果汁的建议,包括强调整个水果比果汁对健康的好处,提供每日果汁摄入量的明确指导,定义果汁中的“游离糖”,并澄清100%果汁和水果饮料之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole Fruits Versus 100% Fruit Juice: Revisiting the Evidence and Its Implications for US Healthy Dietary Recommendations.

Scientific literature remains inconsistent on whether and to what extent 100% fruit juice should be recommended in the diet. Specifically, the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) do not specifically refer to free sugars in fruit juice, and further clarification to provide more explicit guidance may be needed in the 2025-2030 version. We compared evidence on whole fruit and 100% fruit juice regarding its nutrient composition, impact on hunger and satiety, and association with chronic health conditions while highlighting the potential public health perspectives and implications for healthy dietary recommendations. Processing and/or storing 100% fruit juice reduces its fibre, vitamins and other antioxidant contents and transforms intrinsic sugars in the whole fruit into free sugars. Fruit consumed in solid form provides greater satiety due to delayed gastric emptying and related physiological reactions. The synergistic effects of polyphenols and fibre in whole fruit benefit the gut microbiome by acting as prebiotics and producing short-chain fatty acids that reduce inflammation. Although the evidence surrounding 100% fruit juice on chronic conditions remains inconsistent, accumulating studies indicate a more consistently beneficial role of whole fruits. The research evidence reviewed highlights the need for the DGA to update the recommendations on fruit juice, including emphasising the health benefits of whole fruit over fruit juice, providing a clear guideline on the daily fruit juice allowance, defining "free sugars" in fruit juice, and clarifying the distinction between 100% fruit juice and fruit drinks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Bulletin
Nutrition Bulletin NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信