Roy Xiao, Elizabeth R McGonagle, Tessa A Hadlock, James T Heaton
{"title":"经皮面神经额支刺激恢复共动症患者瘫痪眉的动态抬高。","authors":"Roy Xiao, Elizabeth R McGonagle, Tessa A Hadlock, James T Heaton","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2025.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While patients commonly recover motion following facial nerve injury, aberrant neural regeneration can lead to synkinesis and chronic nonflaccid facial palsy (NFFP); many patients fail to recover volitional eyebrow elevation. <b>Objective:</b> To assess if transcutaneous electrical stimulation of injured frontal branches can achieve eyebrow elevation. <b>Methods:</b> We studied healthy volunteers (<i>N</i> = 10) and patients with unilateral NFFP (<i>N</i> = 36). We performed monopolar transcutaneous stimulation of healthy and paralyzed frontal branches with 4-10 mA pulse trains. We measured eyebrow elevation using Emotrics. Differences between stimulated and volitional elevation were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. <b>Results:</b> Stimulable patients (<i>N</i> = 32) were capable of a median of 7.2 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.9-10.5 mm) healthy eyebrow and 1.5 mm (IQR: 0.5-3.1 mm) paralyzed eyebrow volitional elevation. Transcutaneous stimulation of the healthy hemiface achieved a median of 8.5 mm (IQR: 6.3-10.5 mm) eyebrow elevation and 7.2 mm (IQR: 5.3-8.2 mm) on the paralyzed side. Maximum stimulated eyebrow elevation required a median current of 9 mA (IQR: 8-10 mA), which patients felt would be tolerable for daily use in a facial pacing prosthesis. <b>Conclusions:</b> Transcutaneous electrical stimulation can consistently elevate healthy and paralyzed eyebrows in most individuals with NFFP, suggesting they may benefit from dynamic reanimation of eyebrow elevation and possibly other facial regions in future facial pacing systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcutaneous Facial Nerve Frontal Branch Stimulation to Restore Dynamic Elevation of the Paralyzed Eyebrow in Synkinetic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Roy Xiao, Elizabeth R McGonagle, Tessa A Hadlock, James T Heaton\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpsam.2025.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While patients commonly recover motion following facial nerve injury, aberrant neural regeneration can lead to synkinesis and chronic nonflaccid facial palsy (NFFP); many patients fail to recover volitional eyebrow elevation. <b>Objective:</b> To assess if transcutaneous electrical stimulation of injured frontal branches can achieve eyebrow elevation. <b>Methods:</b> We studied healthy volunteers (<i>N</i> = 10) and patients with unilateral NFFP (<i>N</i> = 36). We performed monopolar transcutaneous stimulation of healthy and paralyzed frontal branches with 4-10 mA pulse trains. We measured eyebrow elevation using Emotrics. Differences between stimulated and volitional elevation were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. <b>Results:</b> Stimulable patients (<i>N</i> = 32) were capable of a median of 7.2 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.9-10.5 mm) healthy eyebrow and 1.5 mm (IQR: 0.5-3.1 mm) paralyzed eyebrow volitional elevation. Transcutaneous stimulation of the healthy hemiface achieved a median of 8.5 mm (IQR: 6.3-10.5 mm) eyebrow elevation and 7.2 mm (IQR: 5.3-8.2 mm) on the paralyzed side. Maximum stimulated eyebrow elevation required a median current of 9 mA (IQR: 8-10 mA), which patients felt would be tolerable for daily use in a facial pacing prosthesis. <b>Conclusions:</b> Transcutaneous electrical stimulation can consistently elevate healthy and paralyzed eyebrows in most individuals with NFFP, suggesting they may benefit from dynamic reanimation of eyebrow elevation and possibly other facial regions in future facial pacing systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2025.0015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2025.0015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然面神经损伤后患者通常可以恢复运动,但异常的神经再生可导致联动性和慢性非弛缓性面瘫(NFFP);许多患者不能恢复自愿抬眉。目的:探讨经皮电刺激损伤额支能否达到眉抬高的目的。方法:健康志愿者(N = 10)和单侧NFFP患者(N = 36)为研究对象。我们使用4-10 mA脉冲序列对健康和瘫痪的额叶进行单极经皮刺激。我们使用Emotrics测量眉毛高度。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估受刺激和意志升高之间的差异。结果:可刺激患者(N = 32)健康眉毛中位抬高7.2 mm(四分位间距[IQR]: 5.9-10.5 mm),瘫痪眉毛中位抬高1.5 mm (IQR: 0.5-3.1 mm)。经皮刺激健康侧的眉抬高中位数为8.5 mm (IQR: 6.3-10.5 mm),麻痹侧的眉抬高中位数为7.2 mm (IQR: 5.3-8.2 mm)。最大刺激眉毛抬高需要9 mA (IQR: 8-10 mA)的中位电流,患者认为在面部起搏假体中日常使用是可以忍受的。结论:经皮电刺激可以持续提升大多数NFFP患者的健康和瘫痪的眉毛,这表明他们可能受益于未来面部起搏系统中眉毛抬高和其他面部区域的动态恢复。
Transcutaneous Facial Nerve Frontal Branch Stimulation to Restore Dynamic Elevation of the Paralyzed Eyebrow in Synkinetic Patients.
Background: While patients commonly recover motion following facial nerve injury, aberrant neural regeneration can lead to synkinesis and chronic nonflaccid facial palsy (NFFP); many patients fail to recover volitional eyebrow elevation. Objective: To assess if transcutaneous electrical stimulation of injured frontal branches can achieve eyebrow elevation. Methods: We studied healthy volunteers (N = 10) and patients with unilateral NFFP (N = 36). We performed monopolar transcutaneous stimulation of healthy and paralyzed frontal branches with 4-10 mA pulse trains. We measured eyebrow elevation using Emotrics. Differences between stimulated and volitional elevation were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Stimulable patients (N = 32) were capable of a median of 7.2 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.9-10.5 mm) healthy eyebrow and 1.5 mm (IQR: 0.5-3.1 mm) paralyzed eyebrow volitional elevation. Transcutaneous stimulation of the healthy hemiface achieved a median of 8.5 mm (IQR: 6.3-10.5 mm) eyebrow elevation and 7.2 mm (IQR: 5.3-8.2 mm) on the paralyzed side. Maximum stimulated eyebrow elevation required a median current of 9 mA (IQR: 8-10 mA), which patients felt would be tolerable for daily use in a facial pacing prosthesis. Conclusions: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation can consistently elevate healthy and paralyzed eyebrows in most individuals with NFFP, suggesting they may benefit from dynamic reanimation of eyebrow elevation and possibly other facial regions in future facial pacing systems.