有头和无头空心螺钉固定治疗非移位股骨颈骨折的疗效。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593251330580
Ko-Ta Chen, Hsien-Tsung Lu, Chian-Her Lee, Meng-Huang Wu
{"title":"有头和无头空心螺钉固定治疗非移位股骨颈骨折的疗效。","authors":"Ko-Ta Chen, Hsien-Tsung Lu, Chian-Her Lee, Meng-Huang Wu","doi":"10.1177/21514593251330580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of femoral neck fracture is increasing as society ages. Different types of cannulated screws can be used for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, but no screw selection protocol has been determined to reduce the risk of operation failure. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate differences in outcomes between using cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws for fixation in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged 18 years and older with non-displaced femoral neck fracture, admitted between February 2016 and January 2022, and received fixation using three screws in an inverted triangle configuration were selected for this retrospective study. After exclusions, patients were separated into four groups based on using different combinations of headed cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws. Postoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate operation failure, defined as nonunion or avascular necrosis of the femoral head.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusions, 153 patients (median age 75.0, range 65.0-85.0) with majority of females (69.9%) were included. While the combination of one cannulated compression screw (CCS) and two headless compression screws (HCS) did not achieve statistical significance compared to other screw configurations (<i>P</i> = 0.073), it still demonstrated the lowest rate of operative failure (0.0%). Age was identified as the only significant factor associated with operative failure (adjusted OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.17; <i>P</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences are found in outcomes between different combinations of cannulated headed compression screws and headless compression screws in an inverted triangle configuration for fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"16 ","pages":"21514593251330580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Headed and Headless Cannulated Screws Fixation in Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Ko-Ta Chen, Hsien-Tsung Lu, Chian-Her Lee, Meng-Huang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593251330580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of femoral neck fracture is increasing as society ages. Different types of cannulated screws can be used for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, but no screw selection protocol has been determined to reduce the risk of operation failure. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate differences in outcomes between using cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws for fixation in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged 18 years and older with non-displaced femoral neck fracture, admitted between February 2016 and January 2022, and received fixation using three screws in an inverted triangle configuration were selected for this retrospective study. After exclusions, patients were separated into four groups based on using different combinations of headed cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws. Postoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate operation failure, defined as nonunion or avascular necrosis of the femoral head.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusions, 153 patients (median age 75.0, range 65.0-85.0) with majority of females (69.9%) were included. While the combination of one cannulated compression screw (CCS) and two headless compression screws (HCS) did not achieve statistical significance compared to other screw configurations (<i>P</i> = 0.073), it still demonstrated the lowest rate of operative failure (0.0%). Age was identified as the only significant factor associated with operative failure (adjusted OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.17; <i>P</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences are found in outcomes between different combinations of cannulated headed compression screws and headless compression screws in an inverted triangle configuration for fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"21514593251330580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251330580\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251330580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着社会老龄化,股骨颈骨折的发生率越来越高。不同类型的空心螺钉可用于股骨颈骨折内固定,但尚未确定螺钉选择方案以降低手术失败的风险。本回顾性研究旨在阐明使用空心加压螺钉和无头加压螺钉固定非移位股骨颈骨折的疗效差异。方法:回顾性研究选择2016年2月至2022年1月收治的18岁及以上非移位性股骨颈骨折患者,采用三枚倒三角螺钉固定。排除后,根据使用有头空心加压螺钉和无头加压螺钉的不同组合将患者分为四组。术后计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像用于评估手术失败,定义为股骨头不愈合或无血管坏死。结果:排除后,纳入153例患者(中位年龄75.0岁,范围65.0-85.0岁),其中大多数为女性(69.9%)。虽然1枚空心加压螺钉(CCS)和2枚无头加压螺钉(HCS)的组合与其他螺钉配置相比没有统计学意义(P = 0.073),但其手术失败率仍然最低(0.0%)。年龄被认为是与手术失败相关的唯一重要因素(调整OR: 1.10;95% ci: 1.03-1.17;P = 0.004)。结论:倒三角结构中不同组合空心头加压螺钉与无头加压螺钉固定非移位股骨颈骨折的疗效无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Headed and Headless Cannulated Screws Fixation in Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fracture.

Background: The incidence of femoral neck fracture is increasing as society ages. Different types of cannulated screws can be used for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, but no screw selection protocol has been determined to reduce the risk of operation failure. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate differences in outcomes between using cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws for fixation in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Methods: Adults aged 18 years and older with non-displaced femoral neck fracture, admitted between February 2016 and January 2022, and received fixation using three screws in an inverted triangle configuration were selected for this retrospective study. After exclusions, patients were separated into four groups based on using different combinations of headed cannulated compression screws and headless compression screws. Postoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate operation failure, defined as nonunion or avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Results: After exclusions, 153 patients (median age 75.0, range 65.0-85.0) with majority of females (69.9%) were included. While the combination of one cannulated compression screw (CCS) and two headless compression screws (HCS) did not achieve statistical significance compared to other screw configurations (P = 0.073), it still demonstrated the lowest rate of operative failure (0.0%). Age was identified as the only significant factor associated with operative failure (adjusted OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.17; P = 0.004).

Conclusions: No significant differences are found in outcomes between different combinations of cannulated headed compression screws and headless compression screws in an inverted triangle configuration for fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信