Tamara Perkins, Brian Lee, Juliette Mackin, Dennis Donovan, Stephanie Craig Rushing, Colbie Caughlan, Amanda Gchachu Kakuska, Leanza Walker
{"title":"独木舟的疗愈:参与与不参与青年自杀预防的初步结果。","authors":"Tamara Perkins, Brian Lee, Juliette Mackin, Dennis Donovan, Stephanie Craig Rushing, Colbie Caughlan, Amanda Gchachu Kakuska, Leanza Walker","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01806-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healing of the Canoe (HOC) is a community-derived, culturally grounded, and flexible curriculum for Native youth that builds a connection to culture and community and teaches skills that increase participants' feelings of hope, optimism, and self-efficacy. This exploratory study is the first to examine self-reported survey outcomes after the addition of suicide prevention and intervention modules into the curriculum and includes a comparison group of similar youth. Repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) models examined changes in scores from the Pre-Survey to the Post-Survey for an intervention group and a comparison group of youth in 2018-2019. Survey responses were combined into composite scores for the following categories of interest: hope, mental health, help-seeking and helping, suicide attempts, culture, and resilience. There were 74 youth in the intervention group (IG) and 59 in the non-intervention group (NIG) who completed both Pre- and Post-Surveys. The IG experienced significant positive effects on the hope and resilience scales from Pre- to Post-Survey, while the youth in the NIG saw a decrease in these same scales from Pre- to Post-Survey. The NIG experienced worse outcomes for mental health, while the IG saw a slight improvement. Despite a small number of youth participants and the naturalistic setting, which limited the ability to control for potential confounding variables, the results from this preliminary study are promising. Future studies with larger numbers of youth and more ability to account for additional factors may potentially show even more benefits of the HOC curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healing of the Canoe: Preliminary Suicide Prevention Outcomes Among Participating and Non-Participating Youth.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Perkins, Brian Lee, Juliette Mackin, Dennis Donovan, Stephanie Craig Rushing, Colbie Caughlan, Amanda Gchachu Kakuska, Leanza Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11121-025-01806-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healing of the Canoe (HOC) is a community-derived, culturally grounded, and flexible curriculum for Native youth that builds a connection to culture and community and teaches skills that increase participants' feelings of hope, optimism, and self-efficacy. This exploratory study is the first to examine self-reported survey outcomes after the addition of suicide prevention and intervention modules into the curriculum and includes a comparison group of similar youth. Repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) models examined changes in scores from the Pre-Survey to the Post-Survey for an intervention group and a comparison group of youth in 2018-2019. Survey responses were combined into composite scores for the following categories of interest: hope, mental health, help-seeking and helping, suicide attempts, culture, and resilience. There were 74 youth in the intervention group (IG) and 59 in the non-intervention group (NIG) who completed both Pre- and Post-Surveys. The IG experienced significant positive effects on the hope and resilience scales from Pre- to Post-Survey, while the youth in the NIG saw a decrease in these same scales from Pre- to Post-Survey. The NIG experienced worse outcomes for mental health, while the IG saw a slight improvement. Despite a small number of youth participants and the naturalistic setting, which limited the ability to control for potential confounding variables, the results from this preliminary study are promising. Future studies with larger numbers of youth and more ability to account for additional factors may potentially show even more benefits of the HOC curriculum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01806-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01806-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Healing of the Canoe: Preliminary Suicide Prevention Outcomes Among Participating and Non-Participating Youth.
Healing of the Canoe (HOC) is a community-derived, culturally grounded, and flexible curriculum for Native youth that builds a connection to culture and community and teaches skills that increase participants' feelings of hope, optimism, and self-efficacy. This exploratory study is the first to examine self-reported survey outcomes after the addition of suicide prevention and intervention modules into the curriculum and includes a comparison group of similar youth. Repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) models examined changes in scores from the Pre-Survey to the Post-Survey for an intervention group and a comparison group of youth in 2018-2019. Survey responses were combined into composite scores for the following categories of interest: hope, mental health, help-seeking and helping, suicide attempts, culture, and resilience. There were 74 youth in the intervention group (IG) and 59 in the non-intervention group (NIG) who completed both Pre- and Post-Surveys. The IG experienced significant positive effects on the hope and resilience scales from Pre- to Post-Survey, while the youth in the NIG saw a decrease in these same scales from Pre- to Post-Survey. The NIG experienced worse outcomes for mental health, while the IG saw a slight improvement. Despite a small number of youth participants and the naturalistic setting, which limited the ability to control for potential confounding variables, the results from this preliminary study are promising. Future studies with larger numbers of youth and more ability to account for additional factors may potentially show even more benefits of the HOC curriculum.
期刊介绍:
Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.