免疫检查点抑制剂治疗眼附件和眼周肿瘤。

IF 1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-03-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00130
Palwasha Syar, Sara Moussavi, Carlos Torres-Caballa, Bita Esmaeli
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂治疗眼附件和眼周肿瘤。","authors":"Palwasha Syar, Sara Moussavi, Carlos Torres-Caballa, Bita Esmaeli","doi":"10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into clinical medicine has resulted in more robust response rates for various malignancies, including metastatic and locally advanced periocular and ocular tumors. Their increased utility constitutes a pivotal shift from invasive surgical treatments allowing patients to proceed with eye preserving therapies while also achieving local and metastatic tumor control. The aim of this review article is to provide a summary and updates on the current clinical utility of ICIs for conjunctival and periocular melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, periocular Merkel cell carcinoma and periocular basal cell carcinoma resistant to BRAF inhibitors. A literature search was conducted on PubMed of programmed cell death protein 1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab, tremelimumab) along with previously noted conjunctival and periocular tumors. While this article references several large clinical trials for cutaneous tumors, most of the ocular data are limited to case reports and series. Our overall review presents promising results with the usage of ICI for patients, noting an increased overall survival rate, clinical control of local and metastatic disease and decreased surgical morbidity, while avoiding orbital exenteration. These improvements have not come without considerations for adverse immune-related side effects and clinicians needs to be judicious is deciding between the overall efficacy and side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":44978,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"15 1","pages":"14-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune check point inhibitors for ocular adnexal and periocular tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Palwasha Syar, Sara Moussavi, Carlos Torres-Caballa, Bita Esmaeli\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into clinical medicine has resulted in more robust response rates for various malignancies, including metastatic and locally advanced periocular and ocular tumors. Their increased utility constitutes a pivotal shift from invasive surgical treatments allowing patients to proceed with eye preserving therapies while also achieving local and metastatic tumor control. The aim of this review article is to provide a summary and updates on the current clinical utility of ICIs for conjunctival and periocular melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, periocular Merkel cell carcinoma and periocular basal cell carcinoma resistant to BRAF inhibitors. A literature search was conducted on PubMed of programmed cell death protein 1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab, tremelimumab) along with previously noted conjunctival and periocular tumors. While this article references several large clinical trials for cutaneous tumors, most of the ocular data are limited to case reports and series. Our overall review presents promising results with the usage of ICI for patients, noting an increased overall survival rate, clinical control of local and metastatic disease and decreased surgical morbidity, while avoiding orbital exenteration. These improvements have not come without considerations for adverse immune-related side effects and clinicians needs to be judicious is deciding between the overall efficacy and side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"14-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981561/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)引入临床医学,对各种恶性肿瘤(包括转移性和局部晚期眼周和眼肿瘤)的反应率更高。它们越来越多的效用构成了从侵入性手术治疗的关键转变,允许患者进行保眼治疗,同时也实现了局部和转移性肿瘤的控制。这篇综述文章的目的是总结和更新目前ICIs在结膜和眼周黑色素瘤、鳞状细胞癌、眼周默克尔细胞癌和对BRAF抑制剂耐药的眼周基底细胞癌的临床应用。在PubMed上对程序性细胞死亡蛋白1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab)和CTLA-4抑制剂(ipilimumab, tremelimumab)以及先前发现的结膜和眼周肿瘤进行了文献检索。虽然这篇文章引用了几项针对皮肤肿瘤的大型临床试验,但大多数眼部数据仅限于病例报告和系列。我们的总体回顾显示了ICI在患者中的应用结果,注意到总生存率的提高,局部和转移性疾病的临床控制,手术发病率的降低,同时避免了眼眶剜除。这些改进并非没有考虑到与免疫相关的不良副作用,临床医生需要在总体疗效和副作用之间做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune check point inhibitors for ocular adnexal and periocular tumors.

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into clinical medicine has resulted in more robust response rates for various malignancies, including metastatic and locally advanced periocular and ocular tumors. Their increased utility constitutes a pivotal shift from invasive surgical treatments allowing patients to proceed with eye preserving therapies while also achieving local and metastatic tumor control. The aim of this review article is to provide a summary and updates on the current clinical utility of ICIs for conjunctival and periocular melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, periocular Merkel cell carcinoma and periocular basal cell carcinoma resistant to BRAF inhibitors. A literature search was conducted on PubMed of programmed cell death protein 1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab, tremelimumab) along with previously noted conjunctival and periocular tumors. While this article references several large clinical trials for cutaneous tumors, most of the ocular data are limited to case reports and series. Our overall review presents promising results with the usage of ICI for patients, noting an increased overall survival rate, clinical control of local and metastatic disease and decreased surgical morbidity, while avoiding orbital exenteration. These improvements have not come without considerations for adverse immune-related side effects and clinicians needs to be judicious is deciding between the overall efficacy and side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信