我们能依靠人工智能来指导抗菌治疗吗?系统的文献综述。

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.47
Sulwan AlGain, Alexandre R Marra, Takaaki Kobayashi, Pedro S Marra, Patricia Deffune Celeghini, Mariana Kim Hsieh, Mohammed Abdu Shatari, Samiyah Althagafi, Maria Alayed, Jamila I Ranavaya, Nicole A Boodhoo, Nicholas O Meade, Daniel Fu, Mindy Marie Sampson, Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava, Alex N Zimmet, David Ha, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Boglarka S Huddleston, Jorge L Salinas
{"title":"我们能依靠人工智能来指导抗菌治疗吗?系统的文献综述。","authors":"Sulwan AlGain, Alexandre R Marra, Takaaki Kobayashi, Pedro S Marra, Patricia Deffune Celeghini, Mariana Kim Hsieh, Mohammed Abdu Shatari, Samiyah Althagafi, Maria Alayed, Jamila I Ranavaya, Nicole A Boodhoo, Nicholas O Meade, Daniel Fu, Mindy Marie Sampson, Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava, Alex N Zimmet, David Ha, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Boglarka S Huddleston, Jorge L Salinas","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, including in infectious diseases. By improving antimicrobial resistance prediction and optimizing antibiotic prescriptions, these technologies may support treatment strategies and address critical gaps in healthcare. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AI in guiding appropriate antibiotic prescriptions for infectious diseases through a systematic literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating AI (machine learning or large language models) used for guidance on prescribing appropriate antibiotics in infectious disease cases. Searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published up to October 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing the performance of AI in clinical practice, with outcomes related to antimicrobial management and decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies used machine learning as part of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). They improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance and optimized antimicrobial use. Six studies focused on large language models to guide antimicrobial therapy; they had higher prescribing error rates, patient safety risks, and needed precise prompts to ensure accurate responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI, particularly machine learning integrated into CDSS, holds promise in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving antimicrobial management. However, large language models currently lack the reliability required for complex clinical applications. The indispensable role of infectious disease specialists remains critical for ensuring accurate, personalized, and safe treatment strategies. Rigorous validation and regular updates are essential before the successful integration of AI into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can we rely on artificial intelligence to guide antimicrobial therapy? A systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Sulwan AlGain, Alexandre R Marra, Takaaki Kobayashi, Pedro S Marra, Patricia Deffune Celeghini, Mariana Kim Hsieh, Mohammed Abdu Shatari, Samiyah Althagafi, Maria Alayed, Jamila I Ranavaya, Nicole A Boodhoo, Nicholas O Meade, Daniel Fu, Mindy Marie Sampson, Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava, Alex N Zimmet, David Ha, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Boglarka S Huddleston, Jorge L Salinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, including in infectious diseases. By improving antimicrobial resistance prediction and optimizing antibiotic prescriptions, these technologies may support treatment strategies and address critical gaps in healthcare. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AI in guiding appropriate antibiotic prescriptions for infectious diseases through a systematic literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating AI (machine learning or large language models) used for guidance on prescribing appropriate antibiotics in infectious disease cases. Searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published up to October 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing the performance of AI in clinical practice, with outcomes related to antimicrobial management and decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies used machine learning as part of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). They improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance and optimized antimicrobial use. Six studies focused on large language models to guide antimicrobial therapy; they had higher prescribing error rates, patient safety risks, and needed precise prompts to ensure accurate responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI, particularly machine learning integrated into CDSS, holds promise in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving antimicrobial management. However, large language models currently lack the reliability required for complex clinical applications. The indispensable role of infectious disease specialists remains critical for ensuring accurate, personalized, and safe treatment strategies. Rigorous validation and regular updates are essential before the successful integration of AI into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)具有增强临床决策的潜力,包括在传染病方面。通过改进抗菌素耐药性预测和优化抗生素处方,这些技术可以支持治疗策略并解决医疗保健中的关键差距。本研究通过系统的文献综述,评估人工智能在指导传染病适当抗生素处方方面的有效性。方法:我们对评估人工智能(机器学习或大型语言模型)用于指导传染病病例处方适当抗生素的研究进行了系统综述。在PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar中搜索截至2024年10月25日发表的文章。纳入标准侧重于评估人工智能在临床实践中的表现的研究,其结果与抗菌药物管理和决策有关。结果:17项研究使用机器学习作为临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的一部分。他们改进了抗菌素耐药性的预测并优化了抗菌素的使用。6项研究聚焦于指导抗菌治疗的大型语言模型;他们有更高的处方错误率,患者安全风险,并且需要精确的提示来确保准确的反应。结论:人工智能,特别是整合到CDSS中的机器学习,有望增强临床决策和改善抗菌药物管理。然而,大型语言模型目前缺乏复杂临床应用所需的可靠性。传染病专家的不可或缺的作用仍然是确保准确,个性化和安全的治疗策略的关键。在将人工智能成功整合到临床实践之前,严格的验证和定期更新是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can we rely on artificial intelligence to guide antimicrobial therapy? A systematic literature review.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making, including in infectious diseases. By improving antimicrobial resistance prediction and optimizing antibiotic prescriptions, these technologies may support treatment strategies and address critical gaps in healthcare. This study evaluates the effectiveness of AI in guiding appropriate antibiotic prescriptions for infectious diseases through a systematic literature review.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating AI (machine learning or large language models) used for guidance on prescribing appropriate antibiotics in infectious disease cases. Searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published up to October 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing the performance of AI in clinical practice, with outcomes related to antimicrobial management and decision-making.

Results: Seventeen studies used machine learning as part of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). They improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance and optimized antimicrobial use. Six studies focused on large language models to guide antimicrobial therapy; they had higher prescribing error rates, patient safety risks, and needed precise prompts to ensure accurate responses.

Conclusions: AI, particularly machine learning integrated into CDSS, holds promise in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving antimicrobial management. However, large language models currently lack the reliability required for complex clinical applications. The indispensable role of infectious disease specialists remains critical for ensuring accurate, personalized, and safe treatment strategies. Rigorous validation and regular updates are essential before the successful integration of AI into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信