在治疗情境中探索共情的挑战:解释性现象学分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Tracy Watson, Rebecca Waters, Lynelle Watts, David Hodgson
{"title":"在治疗情境中探索共情的挑战:解释性现象学分析。","authors":"Tracy Watson, Rebecca Waters, Lynelle Watts, David Hodgson","doi":"10.1177/10497323251331460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professionals working in therapeutic contexts are vulnerable to developing occupation-related stress conditions such as burnout, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue. In such contexts, empathy is accepted as a crucial component of practice. However, social neuroscience research suggests empathy may adversely impact workers' well-being. While occupation-related problems like compassion fatigue have relevance, they do not fully explain the potential negative effects of empathy on worker well-being. Therefore, our study aimed to explore whether empathy posed a problem for those working in therapeutic contexts. Participants in this study were qualified professionals working in counselling roles under the Medicare Australia Better Access Initiative. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen participants, and data was analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). This process led to the discovery of four superordinate themes: (1) Navigating Empathy: A Foundation of Practice and an Emotional Challenge; (2) The Interplay Between Therapists' Lived Experience and Empathic Engagement; (3) Balancing the Demands of Empathy With Career Sustainability and Personal Well-being; and (4) When Values and Beliefs Diverge. Two subthemes are (1) Emotional and Physical Exhaustion and (2) Empathy-The Finite Resource. The findings indicate that while empathy is considered central to practice, various emotional, psychological, and occupational challenges are associated with its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251331460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Challenges of Empathy in a Therapeutic Context: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy Watson, Rebecca Waters, Lynelle Watts, David Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10497323251331460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Professionals working in therapeutic contexts are vulnerable to developing occupation-related stress conditions such as burnout, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue. In such contexts, empathy is accepted as a crucial component of practice. However, social neuroscience research suggests empathy may adversely impact workers' well-being. While occupation-related problems like compassion fatigue have relevance, they do not fully explain the potential negative effects of empathy on worker well-being. Therefore, our study aimed to explore whether empathy posed a problem for those working in therapeutic contexts. Participants in this study were qualified professionals working in counselling roles under the Medicare Australia Better Access Initiative. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen participants, and data was analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). This process led to the discovery of four superordinate themes: (1) Navigating Empathy: A Foundation of Practice and an Emotional Challenge; (2) The Interplay Between Therapists' Lived Experience and Empathic Engagement; (3) Balancing the Demands of Empathy With Career Sustainability and Personal Well-being; and (4) When Values and Beliefs Diverge. Two subthemes are (1) Emotional and Physical Exhaustion and (2) Empathy-The Finite Resource. The findings indicate that while empathy is considered central to practice, various emotional, psychological, and occupational challenges are associated with its use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10497323251331460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251331460\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251331460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在治疗环境中工作的专业人员很容易产生与职业相关的压力状况,如倦怠、代理创伤和同情疲劳。在这种情况下,共情被认为是实践的关键组成部分。然而,社会神经科学研究表明,同理心可能会对员工的幸福感产生负面影响。虽然与职业相关的问题,如同情疲劳有相关性,但它们并不能完全解释同理心对员工幸福感的潜在负面影响。因此,我们的研究旨在探讨共情是否对那些在治疗环境中工作的人构成了问题。本研究的参与者是在澳大利亚医疗保险更好访问倡议下从事咨询工作的合格专业人员。对15名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,并使用解释现象学分析(IPA)对数据进行分析。这一过程导致了四个重要主题的发现:(1)导航移情:实践的基础和情感挑战;(2)治疗师生活体验与共情投入的相互作用;(3)平衡共情需求与职业可持续性和个人幸福感;(4)价值观和信念出现分歧。两个副主题是(1)情绪和身体的疲惫和(2)移情-有限的资源。研究结果表明,虽然移情被认为是练习的核心,但各种情感、心理和职业挑战都与它的使用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Challenges of Empathy in a Therapeutic Context: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Professionals working in therapeutic contexts are vulnerable to developing occupation-related stress conditions such as burnout, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue. In such contexts, empathy is accepted as a crucial component of practice. However, social neuroscience research suggests empathy may adversely impact workers' well-being. While occupation-related problems like compassion fatigue have relevance, they do not fully explain the potential negative effects of empathy on worker well-being. Therefore, our study aimed to explore whether empathy posed a problem for those working in therapeutic contexts. Participants in this study were qualified professionals working in counselling roles under the Medicare Australia Better Access Initiative. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen participants, and data was analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). This process led to the discovery of four superordinate themes: (1) Navigating Empathy: A Foundation of Practice and an Emotional Challenge; (2) The Interplay Between Therapists' Lived Experience and Empathic Engagement; (3) Balancing the Demands of Empathy With Career Sustainability and Personal Well-being; and (4) When Values and Beliefs Diverge. Two subthemes are (1) Emotional and Physical Exhaustion and (2) Empathy-The Finite Resource. The findings indicate that while empathy is considered central to practice, various emotional, psychological, and occupational challenges are associated with its use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信