{"title":"减少门诊费用分担对中国健康结果的异质性影响:倾向评分匹配和因果机器学习方法","authors":"Tao Zhang, Meiteng Yu, Yang Song, Jing Liu","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To improve accessibility and financial support for outpatient services, China introduced a scheme to decrease cost-sharing for outpatient care under the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance. This study evaluates the health impacts of this policy and examines its heterogeneous effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilising data from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, we analysed 2896 individual-level observations across 105 prefectures. Propensity score matching and a causal forest model were applied to evaluate the effects on chronic disease status, body pain, self-rated health, and hospitalisation, while accounting for various demographic, socioeconomic, residential, health-related behaviours, and prefecture-specific factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reduction in cost-sharing was significantly linked to decreased probabilities of chronic disease (Average Treatment Effect (ATE) = -0.0619, p < 0.01), body pain (ATE = -0.0715, p < 0.05), and hospitalisation (ATE = -0.0592, p < 0.001), as well as improved self-rated health (ATE = 0.1557, p < 0.001). These benefits may be attributed to reduced out-of-pocket payments for outpatient care (ATE = -287.6112, p < 0.01) and increased outpatient visits (ATE = 0.0414 visits, p < 0.05). Causal forest analyses revealed that older individuals, those with higher educational attainment, higher household income, urban residents, and those engaging in healthier behaviours exhibited larger treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decreasing outpatient cost-sharing in China has beneficial health outcomes, with variations in its impact based on socio-economic status and health behaviours. It is advisable to further increase reimbursement rates and broaden benefit packages for outpatient care, while addressing the unequal distribution of benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneous Effects of Decreasing the Cost-Sharing for Outpatient Care on Health Outcomes in China: A Propensity Score Matching and Causal Machine Learning Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Tao Zhang, Meiteng Yu, Yang Song, Jing Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To improve accessibility and financial support for outpatient services, China introduced a scheme to decrease cost-sharing for outpatient care under the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance. This study evaluates the health impacts of this policy and examines its heterogeneous effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilising data from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, we analysed 2896 individual-level observations across 105 prefectures. Propensity score matching and a causal forest model were applied to evaluate the effects on chronic disease status, body pain, self-rated health, and hospitalisation, while accounting for various demographic, socioeconomic, residential, health-related behaviours, and prefecture-specific factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reduction in cost-sharing was significantly linked to decreased probabilities of chronic disease (Average Treatment Effect (ATE) = -0.0619, p < 0.01), body pain (ATE = -0.0715, p < 0.05), and hospitalisation (ATE = -0.0592, p < 0.001), as well as improved self-rated health (ATE = 0.1557, p < 0.001). These benefits may be attributed to reduced out-of-pocket payments for outpatient care (ATE = -287.6112, p < 0.01) and increased outpatient visits (ATE = 0.0414 visits, p < 0.05). Causal forest analyses revealed that older individuals, those with higher educational attainment, higher household income, urban residents, and those engaging in healthier behaviours exhibited larger treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decreasing outpatient cost-sharing in China has beneficial health outcomes, with variations in its impact based on socio-economic status and health behaviours. It is advisable to further increase reimbursement rates and broaden benefit packages for outpatient care, while addressing the unequal distribution of benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3938\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Heterogeneous Effects of Decreasing the Cost-Sharing for Outpatient Care on Health Outcomes in China: A Propensity Score Matching and Causal Machine Learning Approach.
Background: To improve accessibility and financial support for outpatient services, China introduced a scheme to decrease cost-sharing for outpatient care under the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance. This study evaluates the health impacts of this policy and examines its heterogeneous effects.
Methods: Utilising data from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, we analysed 2896 individual-level observations across 105 prefectures. Propensity score matching and a causal forest model were applied to evaluate the effects on chronic disease status, body pain, self-rated health, and hospitalisation, while accounting for various demographic, socioeconomic, residential, health-related behaviours, and prefecture-specific factors.
Results: The reduction in cost-sharing was significantly linked to decreased probabilities of chronic disease (Average Treatment Effect (ATE) = -0.0619, p < 0.01), body pain (ATE = -0.0715, p < 0.05), and hospitalisation (ATE = -0.0592, p < 0.001), as well as improved self-rated health (ATE = 0.1557, p < 0.001). These benefits may be attributed to reduced out-of-pocket payments for outpatient care (ATE = -287.6112, p < 0.01) and increased outpatient visits (ATE = 0.0414 visits, p < 0.05). Causal forest analyses revealed that older individuals, those with higher educational attainment, higher household income, urban residents, and those engaging in healthier behaviours exhibited larger treatment effects.
Conclusions: Decreasing outpatient cost-sharing in China has beneficial health outcomes, with variations in its impact based on socio-economic status and health behaviours. It is advisable to further increase reimbursement rates and broaden benefit packages for outpatient care, while addressing the unequal distribution of benefits.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.