印度二线城市食管癌切除术的短期疗效

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y
Amita Sekhar Padhy, Rigved Nittala, Srikarthik Voleti, Chaitanya Raju Chalapaka
{"title":"印度二线城市食管癌切除术的短期疗效","authors":"Amita Sekhar Padhy, Rigved Nittala, Srikarthik Voleti, Chaitanya Raju Chalapaka","doi":"10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates short-term outcomes of oesophagectomy at a low-volume cancer hospital in Visakhapatnam, India. Fifteen patients who underwent oesophagectomy from 2020 to 2023 were analysed. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma. The mean age was 55 years and the majority were male. The common approaches used were open transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy. The mean operative time was 9.5 h, and the mean hospital stay was 15.92 days. There were no perioperative deaths, but complications included pulmonary issues, vocal cord paralysis, anastomotic leaks, chyle leaks and wound infections. Higher volume centres tend to have better outcomes after oesophagectomy. However, factors other than volume like patient selection, ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols, specialized critical care and trained multidisciplinary teams also impact outcomes. At our centre, though a low-volume hospital, proper patient selection, prehabilitation and a collaborative team approach helped achieve acceptable results. We recommend developing consensus on defining low- and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy in the Indian context, based on disease burden, resources and constraints. Overall, there is a lack of Indian data comparing outcomes between low and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"16 2","pages":"521-527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-Term Outcomes of Oesophagectomy in a Real-World Scenario from a Tier II City in India.\",\"authors\":\"Amita Sekhar Padhy, Rigved Nittala, Srikarthik Voleti, Chaitanya Raju Chalapaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates short-term outcomes of oesophagectomy at a low-volume cancer hospital in Visakhapatnam, India. Fifteen patients who underwent oesophagectomy from 2020 to 2023 were analysed. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma. The mean age was 55 years and the majority were male. The common approaches used were open transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy. The mean operative time was 9.5 h, and the mean hospital stay was 15.92 days. There were no perioperative deaths, but complications included pulmonary issues, vocal cord paralysis, anastomotic leaks, chyle leaks and wound infections. Higher volume centres tend to have better outcomes after oesophagectomy. However, factors other than volume like patient selection, ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols, specialized critical care and trained multidisciplinary teams also impact outcomes. At our centre, though a low-volume hospital, proper patient selection, prehabilitation and a collaborative team approach helped achieve acceptable results. We recommend developing consensus on defining low- and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy in the Indian context, based on disease burden, resources and constraints. Overall, there is a lack of Indian data comparing outcomes between low and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"521-527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了印度维萨卡帕特南一家小容量肿瘤医院食管癌切除术的短期疗效。对2020年至2023年接受食道切除术的15例患者进行了分析。最常见的组织学为鳞状细胞癌。平均年龄55岁,以男性居多。常用的入路是经食管切开和经胸食管切除术。平均手术时间9.5 h,平均住院时间15.92 d。无围手术期死亡,但并发症包括肺部问题、声带麻痹、吻合口漏、乳糜漏和伤口感染。食管切除术后,大容量中心往往有更好的预后。然而,患者选择、ERAS(术后增强恢复)方案、专门的重症监护和训练有素的多学科团队等因素也会影响结果。在我们的中心,虽然是一家小医院,但适当的患者选择、康复和协作团队方法帮助取得了可接受的结果。我们建议根据疾病负担、资源和限制条件,就确定印度食管切除术的低容量和大容量中心达成共识。总体而言,印度缺乏比较小容量中心和大容量中心食道切除术结果的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-Term Outcomes of Oesophagectomy in a Real-World Scenario from a Tier II City in India.

This study evaluates short-term outcomes of oesophagectomy at a low-volume cancer hospital in Visakhapatnam, India. Fifteen patients who underwent oesophagectomy from 2020 to 2023 were analysed. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma. The mean age was 55 years and the majority were male. The common approaches used were open transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy. The mean operative time was 9.5 h, and the mean hospital stay was 15.92 days. There were no perioperative deaths, but complications included pulmonary issues, vocal cord paralysis, anastomotic leaks, chyle leaks and wound infections. Higher volume centres tend to have better outcomes after oesophagectomy. However, factors other than volume like patient selection, ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols, specialized critical care and trained multidisciplinary teams also impact outcomes. At our centre, though a low-volume hospital, proper patient selection, prehabilitation and a collaborative team approach helped achieve acceptable results. We recommend developing consensus on defining low- and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy in the Indian context, based on disease burden, resources and constraints. Overall, there is a lack of Indian data comparing outcomes between low and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信