胸部超声在三级护理中心重症监护病房呼吸机相关肺炎诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Avinash Babu, Aditi Joshi, Amartya Chakraborti, Pradeep Bajad, Ramniwas Jalendra, Nishant Chauhan, Naveen Dutt
{"title":"胸部超声在三级护理中心重症监护病房呼吸机相关肺炎诊断中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Avinash Babu, Aditi Joshi, Amartya Chakraborti, Pradeep Bajad, Ramniwas Jalendra, Nishant Chauhan, Naveen Dutt","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.2974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a type of nosocomial pneumonia developing in patients who are mechanically ventilated for ≥48 hours. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been shown to be useful in evaluating various pathologic pulmonary conditions. We aimed to study the utility of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of VAP in a critical care unit. This was a monocentric, prospective observational study carried out in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our institution. On clinical suspicion of VAP, patients were subjected to ultrasound chest (lung) examination, which was done in a supine position in six areas of each hemithorax on the same day, and endotracheal aspirate (ETA) for gram stain and aerobic culture was sent within 6 hours. The final diagnosis of VAP was made when ETA culture was positive (>105 CFU/mL). Days of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, hospital stay, and mortality were separately recorded for monitoring outcomes. Diagnostic performance of risk factors for VAP was analyzed by parameters like sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio (positive and negative). Concerning LUS signs, subpleural consolidations >2 had a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 63% with an odds ratio of 51.43 in predicting VAP. Dynamic air bronchogram within consolidation was seen in 45% of patients with a sensitivity and specificity of 29% and 73%, respectively. A clinical LUS score >2 had a sensitivity of 100% in predicting VAP. LUS is a robust diagnostic tool with high sensitivity for diagnosing VAP. Clinical trials are needed to study whether LUS can be used as a tool for early diagnosis of VAP, which will help in the timely introduction of antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critical care unit of a tertiary care center: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Avinash Babu, Aditi Joshi, Amartya Chakraborti, Pradeep Bajad, Ramniwas Jalendra, Nishant Chauhan, Naveen Dutt\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/monaldi.2025.2974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a type of nosocomial pneumonia developing in patients who are mechanically ventilated for ≥48 hours. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been shown to be useful in evaluating various pathologic pulmonary conditions. We aimed to study the utility of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of VAP in a critical care unit. This was a monocentric, prospective observational study carried out in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our institution. On clinical suspicion of VAP, patients were subjected to ultrasound chest (lung) examination, which was done in a supine position in six areas of each hemithorax on the same day, and endotracheal aspirate (ETA) for gram stain and aerobic culture was sent within 6 hours. The final diagnosis of VAP was made when ETA culture was positive (>105 CFU/mL). Days of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, hospital stay, and mortality were separately recorded for monitoring outcomes. Diagnostic performance of risk factors for VAP was analyzed by parameters like sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio (positive and negative). Concerning LUS signs, subpleural consolidations >2 had a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 63% with an odds ratio of 51.43 in predicting VAP. Dynamic air bronchogram within consolidation was seen in 45% of patients with a sensitivity and specificity of 29% and 73%, respectively. A clinical LUS score >2 had a sensitivity of 100% in predicting VAP. LUS is a robust diagnostic tool with high sensitivity for diagnosing VAP. Clinical trials are needed to study whether LUS can be used as a tool for early diagnosis of VAP, which will help in the timely introduction of antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.2974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.2974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是一种发生在机械通气≥48小时的患者中的院内肺炎。肺超声(LUS)已被证明是有用的评估各种病理性肺条件。我们的目的是研究胸部超声在重症监护病房VAP诊断中的应用。这是一项在我院重症监护病房(ICU)开展的单中心前瞻性观察性研究。对临床怀疑为VAP的患者,于当日在每侧半胸6个部位取仰卧位行超声胸(肺)检查,6小时内送气管内吸出(ETA)革兰氏染色及好氧培养。当ETA培养阳性(> - 105 CFU/mL)时,最终诊断为VAP。分别记录机械通气天数、ICU住院天数、住院天数和死亡率作为监测结果。通过敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、似然比(阳性和阴性)等参数分析危险因素对VAP的诊断效果。对于LUS征象,胸膜下实变>2预测VAP的敏感性为96%,特异性为63%,比值比为51.43。45%的患者在实变期间出现动态支气管空气征,其敏感性和特异性分别为29%和73%。临床LUS评分bb0.2预测VAP的敏感性为100%。LUS是一种可靠的VAP诊断工具,具有很高的灵敏度。LUS能否作为VAP早期诊断的工具,有助于及时引入抗生素,还需要进行临床试验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critical care unit of a tertiary care center: a prospective observational study.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a type of nosocomial pneumonia developing in patients who are mechanically ventilated for ≥48 hours. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been shown to be useful in evaluating various pathologic pulmonary conditions. We aimed to study the utility of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of VAP in a critical care unit. This was a monocentric, prospective observational study carried out in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our institution. On clinical suspicion of VAP, patients were subjected to ultrasound chest (lung) examination, which was done in a supine position in six areas of each hemithorax on the same day, and endotracheal aspirate (ETA) for gram stain and aerobic culture was sent within 6 hours. The final diagnosis of VAP was made when ETA culture was positive (>105 CFU/mL). Days of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, hospital stay, and mortality were separately recorded for monitoring outcomes. Diagnostic performance of risk factors for VAP was analyzed by parameters like sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio (positive and negative). Concerning LUS signs, subpleural consolidations >2 had a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 63% with an odds ratio of 51.43 in predicting VAP. Dynamic air bronchogram within consolidation was seen in 45% of patients with a sensitivity and specificity of 29% and 73%, respectively. A clinical LUS score >2 had a sensitivity of 100% in predicting VAP. LUS is a robust diagnostic tool with high sensitivity for diagnosing VAP. Clinical trials are needed to study whether LUS can be used as a tool for early diagnosis of VAP, which will help in the timely introduction of antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信