COVID-19隔离和恢复站点评估:为系统创新吸取的经验教训。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michelle Firestone, Kimia Khoee, Gillian Kolla, Patricia O'Campo, Rosane Nisenbaum, D Linn Holness, Lisa Schlosser, Michaela Beder, Lorie Steer, Terry Pariseau, Ahmed M Bayoumi
{"title":"COVID-19隔离和恢复站点评估:为系统创新吸取的经验教训。","authors":"Michelle Firestone, Kimia Khoee, Gillian Kolla, Patricia O'Campo, Rosane Nisenbaum, D Linn Holness, Lisa Schlosser, Michaela Beder, Lorie Steer, Terry Pariseau, Ahmed M Bayoumi","doi":"10.17269/s41997-025-01031-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The City of Toronto opened COVID-19 Isolation and Recovery Sites (CIRS) in 2020 in response to the need for supported isolation spaces for people experiencing homelessness. As a team of academic researchers and community partners, we assessed how lessons from the CIRS can inform post-pandemic policies for people experiencing homelessness. We focused on identifying models and systems of care for understanding existing services and integration, identifying innovations, and imagining how care can be transformed to be more caring and just.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 43 key informant interviews with clinicians, peer and harm reduction workers, executive leaders, operational leaders, and people who worked for funding or decision-making organizations. Data were coded and analyzed using deductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CIRS presented a new service model that moved away from being overly medicalized towards having a community orientation, which involved greater integration of services for people experiencing homelessness, transparent decision-making, and open communication. Key to this approach were clinical case management, harm reduction services, strong support of peer workers, and adequate and consistent funding. Future models will need to address power imbalances and hierarchies through formal agreements and processes as well as establishing collaborative cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CIRS offer an important opportunity to rethink services offered within shelter settings. Such change will require a strong vision, sufficient funding, political will, and accountability among all stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic offers decision makers an opportunity to consider system-level transformation by looking at largely successful elements of the crisis responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 isolation and recovery sites evaluation: Lessons learned for systems innovation.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Firestone, Kimia Khoee, Gillian Kolla, Patricia O'Campo, Rosane Nisenbaum, D Linn Holness, Lisa Schlosser, Michaela Beder, Lorie Steer, Terry Pariseau, Ahmed M Bayoumi\",\"doi\":\"10.17269/s41997-025-01031-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The City of Toronto opened COVID-19 Isolation and Recovery Sites (CIRS) in 2020 in response to the need for supported isolation spaces for people experiencing homelessness. As a team of academic researchers and community partners, we assessed how lessons from the CIRS can inform post-pandemic policies for people experiencing homelessness. We focused on identifying models and systems of care for understanding existing services and integration, identifying innovations, and imagining how care can be transformed to be more caring and just.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 43 key informant interviews with clinicians, peer and harm reduction workers, executive leaders, operational leaders, and people who worked for funding or decision-making organizations. Data were coded and analyzed using deductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CIRS presented a new service model that moved away from being overly medicalized towards having a community orientation, which involved greater integration of services for people experiencing homelessness, transparent decision-making, and open communication. Key to this approach were clinical case management, harm reduction services, strong support of peer workers, and adequate and consistent funding. Future models will need to address power imbalances and hierarchies through formal agreements and processes as well as establishing collaborative cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CIRS offer an important opportunity to rethink services offered within shelter settings. Such change will require a strong vision, sufficient funding, political will, and accountability among all stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic offers decision makers an opportunity to consider system-level transformation by looking at largely successful elements of the crisis responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01031-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01031-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多伦多市于2020年开放了COVID-19隔离和恢复站点(CIRS),以满足无家可归者对支持性隔离空间的需求。作为一个由学术研究人员和社区合作伙伴组成的团队,我们评估了CIRS的经验教训如何为大流行后无家可归者的政策提供信息。我们专注于确定护理模式和系统,以了解现有服务和整合,确定创新,并设想如何将护理转变为更有爱心和更公正。方法:我们对临床医生、同伴和减少伤害工作者、行政领导、业务领导以及在资助或决策组织工作的人员进行了43次关键线人访谈。使用演绎内容分析对数据进行编码和分析。结果:CIRS提出了一种新的服务模式,从过度医疗化转向以社区为导向,其中包括为无家可归者提供更大程度的服务整合、透明的决策和开放的沟通。这一方法的关键是临床病例管理、减少伤害服务、同行工作者的有力支持以及充足和持续的资金。未来的模式将需要通过正式的协议和流程以及建立协作文化来解决权力不平衡和等级制度。结论:CIRS为重新思考庇护所内提供的服务提供了重要机会。这种变革需要强有力的愿景、充足的资金、政治意愿和所有利益攸关方的问责制。2019冠状病毒病大流行为决策者提供了一个机会,通过考察危机应对中基本成功的要素,来考虑系统层面的转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 isolation and recovery sites evaluation: Lessons learned for systems innovation.

Objective: The City of Toronto opened COVID-19 Isolation and Recovery Sites (CIRS) in 2020 in response to the need for supported isolation spaces for people experiencing homelessness. As a team of academic researchers and community partners, we assessed how lessons from the CIRS can inform post-pandemic policies for people experiencing homelessness. We focused on identifying models and systems of care for understanding existing services and integration, identifying innovations, and imagining how care can be transformed to be more caring and just.

Methods: We conducted 43 key informant interviews with clinicians, peer and harm reduction workers, executive leaders, operational leaders, and people who worked for funding or decision-making organizations. Data were coded and analyzed using deductive content analysis.

Results: The CIRS presented a new service model that moved away from being overly medicalized towards having a community orientation, which involved greater integration of services for people experiencing homelessness, transparent decision-making, and open communication. Key to this approach were clinical case management, harm reduction services, strong support of peer workers, and adequate and consistent funding. Future models will need to address power imbalances and hierarchies through formal agreements and processes as well as establishing collaborative cultures.

Conclusion: The CIRS offer an important opportunity to rethink services offered within shelter settings. Such change will require a strong vision, sufficient funding, political will, and accountability among all stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic offers decision makers an opportunity to consider system-level transformation by looking at largely successful elements of the crisis responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities. CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health. CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.   Énoncé de mission La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé. La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations. La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信