课堂辩论作为一种教学方法来探讨医疗系统与患者群体成员之间的关系。

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Naeema Hopkins-Kotb, Elizabeth Janiak, Alex S Keuroghlian, Deborah Bartz
{"title":"课堂辩论作为一种教学方法来探讨医疗系统与患者群体成员之间的关系。","authors":"Naeema Hopkins-Kotb, Elizabeth Janiak, Alex S Keuroghlian, Deborah Bartz","doi":"10.1177/23821205251329720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are multiple complexities within the practice of medicine wherein the vantage of the medical community might be limited or in direct conflict with the vantage of a patient population. Reproductive justice (RJ) is a framework developed from the vantage of Black women's health activists to identify and address inequitable reproductive health outcomes, consider the intersection of reproductive rights and social justice, and center the experiences of historically marginalized communities. Using the contemporary example of the federal Medicaid Sterilization Form, we highlight how the pedagogy of classroom debate can teach medical students to engage thoughtfully with the complex intersection between community population perspectives and the medical profession's advocacy for standardized provision of health services. Debate has long-standing use in education and can build core medical student communication and professionalism competencies while facilitating active learning around complex medical care topics. However, it can have limited efficacy without careful attention to the development of a psychologically safe learning environment and the inclusion of nuanced and diverse perspectives. Herein, we share our debate curriculum and demonstrate how this approach aligns with the community-developed RJ framework that recognizes systems outside medicine that contribute to reproductive outcomes. Our method encourages students to critically evaluate existing literature for authorship, representation, and community participation-a crucial practice for all students to understand the importance of equity in medical research development and healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251329720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classroom Debate as a Pedagogical Method to Explore the Relationship Between the Medical System and Patient Community Members.\",\"authors\":\"Naeema Hopkins-Kotb, Elizabeth Janiak, Alex S Keuroghlian, Deborah Bartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205251329720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are multiple complexities within the practice of medicine wherein the vantage of the medical community might be limited or in direct conflict with the vantage of a patient population. Reproductive justice (RJ) is a framework developed from the vantage of Black women's health activists to identify and address inequitable reproductive health outcomes, consider the intersection of reproductive rights and social justice, and center the experiences of historically marginalized communities. Using the contemporary example of the federal Medicaid Sterilization Form, we highlight how the pedagogy of classroom debate can teach medical students to engage thoughtfully with the complex intersection between community population perspectives and the medical profession's advocacy for standardized provision of health services. Debate has long-standing use in education and can build core medical student communication and professionalism competencies while facilitating active learning around complex medical care topics. However, it can have limited efficacy without careful attention to the development of a psychologically safe learning environment and the inclusion of nuanced and diverse perspectives. Herein, we share our debate curriculum and demonstrate how this approach aligns with the community-developed RJ framework that recognizes systems outside medicine that contribute to reproductive outcomes. Our method encourages students to critically evaluate existing literature for authorship, representation, and community participation-a crucial practice for all students to understand the importance of equity in medical research development and healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23821205251329720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035015/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251329720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251329720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医学实践中存在多种复杂性,其中医学界的优势可能受到限制或与患者群体的优势直接冲突。生殖正义(RJ)是从黑人妇女健康活动家的优势发展起来的一个框架,以确定和解决不公平的生殖健康结果,考虑生殖权利和社会正义的交叉点,并以历史上边缘化社区的经验为中心。以联邦医疗补助绝育表为例,我们强调课堂辩论的教学方法如何能够教会医学生深思熟虑地参与社区人口观点与医学专业倡导的标准化卫生服务之间的复杂交集。辩论在教育中长期使用,可以培养医学生的核心沟通和专业能力,同时促进围绕复杂医疗主题的主动学习。然而,如果不仔细关注心理安全学习环境的发展和包含细微差别和不同的观点,它的功效可能有限。在此,我们分享了我们的辩论课程,并展示了这种方法如何与社区开发的RJ框架保持一致,该框架承认医学之外的系统有助于生殖结果。我们的方法鼓励学生批判性地评估现有文献的作者,代表性和社区参与-这是所有学生理解医学研究发展和医疗保健公平重要性的关键实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classroom Debate as a Pedagogical Method to Explore the Relationship Between the Medical System and Patient Community Members.

There are multiple complexities within the practice of medicine wherein the vantage of the medical community might be limited or in direct conflict with the vantage of a patient population. Reproductive justice (RJ) is a framework developed from the vantage of Black women's health activists to identify and address inequitable reproductive health outcomes, consider the intersection of reproductive rights and social justice, and center the experiences of historically marginalized communities. Using the contemporary example of the federal Medicaid Sterilization Form, we highlight how the pedagogy of classroom debate can teach medical students to engage thoughtfully with the complex intersection between community population perspectives and the medical profession's advocacy for standardized provision of health services. Debate has long-standing use in education and can build core medical student communication and professionalism competencies while facilitating active learning around complex medical care topics. However, it can have limited efficacy without careful attention to the development of a psychologically safe learning environment and the inclusion of nuanced and diverse perspectives. Herein, we share our debate curriculum and demonstrate how this approach aligns with the community-developed RJ framework that recognizes systems outside medicine that contribute to reproductive outcomes. Our method encourages students to critically evaluate existing literature for authorship, representation, and community participation-a crucial practice for all students to understand the importance of equity in medical research development and healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信