自杀遗书:定性研究的范围审查,以强调预防方法上的机会。

Omega Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1177/00302228251339862
Giacomo Belli, Benedetta Trentarossi, Mateus Eduardo Romão, Makilim Nunes Baptista, Serena Barello, Silvia Damiana Visonà
{"title":"自杀遗书:定性研究的范围审查,以强调预防方法上的机会。","authors":"Giacomo Belli, Benedetta Trentarossi, Mateus Eduardo Romão, Makilim Nunes Baptista, Serena Barello, Silvia Damiana Visonà","doi":"10.1177/00302228251339862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide is a public health concern, and prevention programs are fundamental to decreasing its rates. Suicide notes might be crucial to understanding motives associated with suicidal behaviours. In this way, it is necessary to understand the qualitative methods that are most frequently used to analyze this data. Investigating these factors is crucial for developing targeted and preventive interventions. This scoping review aimed to answer the question \"What is the state of art about qualitative methods adopted to analyze suicide notes?\" by systematically mapping the literature on this topic. This review adopted the JBI guidelines for Scoping Reviews and followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy has been implemented across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Grey literature was not included in this review. Eligible studies encompassed qualitative studies on suicide notes published in English. Two independent researchers screened titles and abstracts and subsequently conducted full-text assessments based on predefined inclusion criteria. Relevant data have been systematically extracted and tabulated. The findings were thematically organized and qualitatively summarized, with potential visual aids such as graphs and tables. The studies highlighted the most used qualitative methods to analyze suicide notes, such as LIWC, Leenar's, Grounded Theory, Thematic Analysis and others. This study summarizes the current knowledge about qualitative methods to analyze suicide notes. Further research is necessary for the development of prevention programs destined for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"302228251339862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide Notes: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies to Highlight Methodological Opportunities for Prevention.\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Belli, Benedetta Trentarossi, Mateus Eduardo Romão, Makilim Nunes Baptista, Serena Barello, Silvia Damiana Visonà\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00302228251339862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Suicide is a public health concern, and prevention programs are fundamental to decreasing its rates. Suicide notes might be crucial to understanding motives associated with suicidal behaviours. In this way, it is necessary to understand the qualitative methods that are most frequently used to analyze this data. Investigating these factors is crucial for developing targeted and preventive interventions. This scoping review aimed to answer the question \\\"What is the state of art about qualitative methods adopted to analyze suicide notes?\\\" by systematically mapping the literature on this topic. This review adopted the JBI guidelines for Scoping Reviews and followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy has been implemented across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Grey literature was not included in this review. Eligible studies encompassed qualitative studies on suicide notes published in English. Two independent researchers screened titles and abstracts and subsequently conducted full-text assessments based on predefined inclusion criteria. Relevant data have been systematically extracted and tabulated. The findings were thematically organized and qualitatively summarized, with potential visual aids such as graphs and tables. The studies highlighted the most used qualitative methods to analyze suicide notes, such as LIWC, Leenar's, Grounded Theory, Thematic Analysis and others. This study summarizes the current knowledge about qualitative methods to analyze suicide notes. Further research is necessary for the development of prevention programs destined for this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"302228251339862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228251339862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228251339862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自杀是一个公共卫生问题,预防项目是降低自杀率的基础。遗书可能对理解自杀行为的动机至关重要。这样,就有必要了解最常用于分析这些数据的定性方法。调查这些因素对于制定有针对性的预防性干预措施至关重要。这个范围审查的目的是通过系统地绘制关于这个主题的文献来回答这个问题“什么是采用定性方法来分析遗书的艺术状态?”。本次审查采用了JBI范围审查指南,并遵循PRISMA-ScR指南。在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库中实现了一个全面的搜索策略。灰色文献未纳入本综述。合格的研究包括以英文发表的自杀遗书的定性研究。两名独立研究人员筛选标题和摘要,随后根据预先确定的纳入标准进行全文评估。相关数据已被系统地提取并制成表格。这些发现是按主题组织和定性总结的,并辅以图形和表格等潜在的视觉辅助。这些研究强调了最常用的定性方法来分析遗书,如LIWC, Leenar's, Grounded Theory, Thematic Analysis等。本研究总结了目前关于定性方法分析遗书的知识。有必要进行进一步的研究,以制定针对这一人群的预防方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicide Notes: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies to Highlight Methodological Opportunities for Prevention.

Suicide is a public health concern, and prevention programs are fundamental to decreasing its rates. Suicide notes might be crucial to understanding motives associated with suicidal behaviours. In this way, it is necessary to understand the qualitative methods that are most frequently used to analyze this data. Investigating these factors is crucial for developing targeted and preventive interventions. This scoping review aimed to answer the question "What is the state of art about qualitative methods adopted to analyze suicide notes?" by systematically mapping the literature on this topic. This review adopted the JBI guidelines for Scoping Reviews and followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy has been implemented across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Grey literature was not included in this review. Eligible studies encompassed qualitative studies on suicide notes published in English. Two independent researchers screened titles and abstracts and subsequently conducted full-text assessments based on predefined inclusion criteria. Relevant data have been systematically extracted and tabulated. The findings were thematically organized and qualitatively summarized, with potential visual aids such as graphs and tables. The studies highlighted the most used qualitative methods to analyze suicide notes, such as LIWC, Leenar's, Grounded Theory, Thematic Analysis and others. This study summarizes the current knowledge about qualitative methods to analyze suicide notes. Further research is necessary for the development of prevention programs destined for this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信