使用组织患者安全事件数据进行研究的平衡方法。

Q3 Medicine
Laura D Pozzobon, Ashley Tattersall, Sarah Tosoni, AnnMarie Edward, Ann Heesters, Carole Garmaise, Michael W Caesar, Tara Marshman, Lucas B Chartier
{"title":"使用组织患者安全事件数据进行研究的平衡方法。","authors":"Laura D Pozzobon, Ashley Tattersall, Sarah Tosoni, AnnMarie Edward, Ann Heesters, Carole Garmaise, Michael W Caesar, Tara Marshman, Lucas B Chartier","doi":"10.1177/08404704251331179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reported patient safety incidents offer high-value perspectives on safety threats but can be an untapped source of learning due to their sensitive nature and the presence of potential data protected under Quality Assurance (QA) legislations. There are no published guidelines for leaders to enable ethical use of data protected under QA legislation in reported patient safety incidents within the Canadian context. Liberating this data requires understanding the appropriate purposes for use, which draws on ethical and privacy-related considerations. We describe the approach followed to balance the duty to protect relevant privacy interests with the moral obligation to conduct research, and the proactive prevention of patient harm at our Canadian multi-site academic health sciences centre. Overall, we developed guidelines and discovered leaders must commit to establishing connections between organizational governance, legal structures, and privacy experts to support research enabling learning from patient safety incidents.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251331179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A balanced approach to using organizational patient safety incident data for research.\",\"authors\":\"Laura D Pozzobon, Ashley Tattersall, Sarah Tosoni, AnnMarie Edward, Ann Heesters, Carole Garmaise, Michael W Caesar, Tara Marshman, Lucas B Chartier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08404704251331179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reported patient safety incidents offer high-value perspectives on safety threats but can be an untapped source of learning due to their sensitive nature and the presence of potential data protected under Quality Assurance (QA) legislations. There are no published guidelines for leaders to enable ethical use of data protected under QA legislation in reported patient safety incidents within the Canadian context. Liberating this data requires understanding the appropriate purposes for use, which draws on ethical and privacy-related considerations. We describe the approach followed to balance the duty to protect relevant privacy interests with the moral obligation to conduct research, and the proactive prevention of patient harm at our Canadian multi-site academic health sciences centre. Overall, we developed guidelines and discovered leaders must commit to establishing connections between organizational governance, legal structures, and privacy experts to support research enabling learning from patient safety incidents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8404704251331179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251331179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251331179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

报告的患者安全事件为安全威胁提供了高价值的视角,但由于其敏感性和受质量保证(QA)立法保护的潜在数据的存在,可能是一个未开发的学习来源。在加拿大的背景下,在报告的患者安全事件中,领导者没有公开的指导方针,以确保道德地使用受QA立法保护的数据。释放这些数据需要理解适当的使用目的,这需要考虑道德和隐私相关的因素。我们描述了在我们加拿大多站点学术健康科学中心平衡保护相关隐私利益的责任与开展研究的道德义务以及主动预防患者伤害所遵循的方法。总的来说,我们制定了指导方针,并发现领导者必须致力于在组织治理、法律结构和隐私专家之间建立联系,以支持能够从患者安全事件中学习的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A balanced approach to using organizational patient safety incident data for research.

Reported patient safety incidents offer high-value perspectives on safety threats but can be an untapped source of learning due to their sensitive nature and the presence of potential data protected under Quality Assurance (QA) legislations. There are no published guidelines for leaders to enable ethical use of data protected under QA legislation in reported patient safety incidents within the Canadian context. Liberating this data requires understanding the appropriate purposes for use, which draws on ethical and privacy-related considerations. We describe the approach followed to balance the duty to protect relevant privacy interests with the moral obligation to conduct research, and the proactive prevention of patient harm at our Canadian multi-site academic health sciences centre. Overall, we developed guidelines and discovered leaders must commit to establishing connections between organizational governance, legal structures, and privacy experts to support research enabling learning from patient safety incidents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信