全氟脲脂质微球超声心动图对比:1例非PEG引起的过敏反应。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Chloe Wang, Jackie Campbell, Harriet Lea-Banks, Erika Lee
{"title":"全氟脲脂质微球超声心动图对比:1例非PEG引起的过敏反应。","authors":"Chloe Wang, Jackie Campbell, Harriet Lea-Banks, Erika Lee","doi":"10.1186/s13223-025-00964-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perflutren lipid microsphere suspension, sold under the brand name Definity®, is a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent. The microspheres contain octafluoropropane (C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>) gas encapsulated by an outer lipid shell of phospholipids and a polyethylene glycol (PEG)ylated phospholipid. Anaphylaxis to perflutren lipid microsphere is very rare, with only one case report clearly attributing the reaction to the PEG excipient. We report a novel case of anaphylaxis likely caused by a non-PEGylated component of Definity®.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Our patient is a healthy 54-year-old female, who underwent an exercise stress transthoracic echocardiogram using Definity® as an enhancing agent. She experienced anaphylaxis within 15 min of injection. Symptoms resolved after she was treated with diphenhydramine and epinephrine, followed by a systemic corticosteroid and ondansetron in the Emergency Department. The patient underwent allergy testing at our clinic for Definity® and various PEG-containing substances. While all PEG products tested negative, she had positive intradermal tests to Definity®. She also had negative skin prick testing to PEG 8000 and passed an oral challenge to PEG 3350, thus ruling out PEG as the causative agent of anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our case report highlights a previously undocumented instance of anaphylaxis to Definity® not caused by PEG. We suspect the reaction to be an IgE-mediated response to a non-PEGylated component of Definity®. An alternative explanation for the reaction could be a complement activation-related pseudoallergy. This report provides critical information to physicians on the potential risks of using Definity® and contributes to growing research surrounding the profile of Definity®.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":"21 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perflutren lipid microspheres for echocardiogram contrast: a clinical case of anaphylaxis not caused by PEG.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Wang, Jackie Campbell, Harriet Lea-Banks, Erika Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13223-025-00964-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perflutren lipid microsphere suspension, sold under the brand name Definity®, is a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent. The microspheres contain octafluoropropane (C<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>) gas encapsulated by an outer lipid shell of phospholipids and a polyethylene glycol (PEG)ylated phospholipid. Anaphylaxis to perflutren lipid microsphere is very rare, with only one case report clearly attributing the reaction to the PEG excipient. We report a novel case of anaphylaxis likely caused by a non-PEGylated component of Definity®.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Our patient is a healthy 54-year-old female, who underwent an exercise stress transthoracic echocardiogram using Definity® as an enhancing agent. She experienced anaphylaxis within 15 min of injection. Symptoms resolved after she was treated with diphenhydramine and epinephrine, followed by a systemic corticosteroid and ondansetron in the Emergency Department. The patient underwent allergy testing at our clinic for Definity® and various PEG-containing substances. While all PEG products tested negative, she had positive intradermal tests to Definity®. She also had negative skin prick testing to PEG 8000 and passed an oral challenge to PEG 3350, thus ruling out PEG as the causative agent of anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our case report highlights a previously undocumented instance of anaphylaxis to Definity® not caused by PEG. We suspect the reaction to be an IgE-mediated response to a non-PEGylated component of Definity®. An alternative explanation for the reaction could be a complement activation-related pseudoallergy. This report provides critical information to physicians on the potential risks of using Definity® and contributes to growing research surrounding the profile of Definity®.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-025-00964-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-025-00964-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全氟trenn脂质微球悬浮液,以品牌名称Definity®销售,是一种微泡超声造影剂。微球包含由磷脂和聚乙二醇(PEG)酰化磷脂的外脂壳封装的八氟丙烷(C3F8)气体。全氟脲脂质微球的过敏反应是非常罕见的,只有一个病例报告明确归因于PEG辅料的反应。我们报告了一个新的过敏性反应可能由非聚乙二醇的Definity®的成分引起的病例。病例介绍:我们的患者是一名健康的54岁女性,她使用Definity®作为增强剂接受了运动应激性经胸超声心动图检查。她在注射后15分钟内出现过敏反应。在急诊科给予苯海拉明和肾上腺素治疗后,症状消退,随后给予全身皮质类固醇和昂丹西琼治疗。患者在我们的诊所接受了Definity®和各种含peg物质的过敏测试。虽然所有PEG产品均呈阴性,但她对Definity®的皮内试验呈阳性。她的PEG 8000皮肤点刺试验也呈阴性,而PEG 3350通过了口腔挑战,因此排除了PEG作为过敏反应的病原体。结论:我们的病例报告强调了先前未记录的对Definity®非PEG引起的过敏反应的实例。我们怀疑该反应是ige介导的对Definity®非聚乙二醇化成分的反应。对该反应的另一种解释可能是补体激活相关的假过敏。本报告为医生提供了关于使用Definity®潜在风险的重要信息,并有助于围绕Definity®的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perflutren lipid microspheres for echocardiogram contrast: a clinical case of anaphylaxis not caused by PEG.

Background: Perflutren lipid microsphere suspension, sold under the brand name Definity®, is a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent. The microspheres contain octafluoropropane (C3F8) gas encapsulated by an outer lipid shell of phospholipids and a polyethylene glycol (PEG)ylated phospholipid. Anaphylaxis to perflutren lipid microsphere is very rare, with only one case report clearly attributing the reaction to the PEG excipient. We report a novel case of anaphylaxis likely caused by a non-PEGylated component of Definity®.

Case presentation: Our patient is a healthy 54-year-old female, who underwent an exercise stress transthoracic echocardiogram using Definity® as an enhancing agent. She experienced anaphylaxis within 15 min of injection. Symptoms resolved after she was treated with diphenhydramine and epinephrine, followed by a systemic corticosteroid and ondansetron in the Emergency Department. The patient underwent allergy testing at our clinic for Definity® and various PEG-containing substances. While all PEG products tested negative, she had positive intradermal tests to Definity®. She also had negative skin prick testing to PEG 8000 and passed an oral challenge to PEG 3350, thus ruling out PEG as the causative agent of anaphylaxis.

Conclusions: Our case report highlights a previously undocumented instance of anaphylaxis to Definity® not caused by PEG. We suspect the reaction to be an IgE-mediated response to a non-PEGylated component of Definity®. An alternative explanation for the reaction could be a complement activation-related pseudoallergy. This report provides critical information to physicians on the potential risks of using Definity® and contributes to growing research surrounding the profile of Definity®.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信