面对邪恶的问题和蔓延的危机:综合危机管理。

Q3 Medicine
Brendan Monahan
{"title":"面对邪恶的问题和蔓延的危机:综合危机管理。","authors":"Brendan Monahan","doi":"10.69554/QFYT8147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The disciplines of crisis management, emergency management, business continuity and resilience are at an inflection point. Is the work of professionals in these fields subject to what some have called at recent industry conferences a failure of imagination? Are the tried-and-true methods and activities serving practitioners as well as they always have, or does today's world demand something different? The more important question is: In these conditions, how can crisis leaders do the most good? To answer that question, crisis management professionals may consider shifting their emphasis from planning, training and exercising alone and introducing more explicit focus on the delivery of good decision making - in other words, a transition of emphasis from response planning to more strategic programme management. All crises - whether fast burning, slow burning or creeping - require decision making. Ultimately in the aftermath, organisations and their leaders are judged not only on the outcomes of a crisis response, but on the decisions they made. Furthermore, this judgment is made not only on whether the decisions were right or wrong alone, but also whether they were defensible based on the best available information at the time. In confrontation with these realities, there is a unique role for enterprise crisis teams to define a value proposition along a set of guiding principles. From there, operational execution may be bridged through an integrated crisis management framework. This paper proposes a way forward along these lines. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.</p>","PeriodicalId":39080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of business continuity & emergency planning","volume":"18 4","pages":"314-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confronting wicked problems and creeping crises: Integrated crisis management.\",\"authors\":\"Brendan Monahan\",\"doi\":\"10.69554/QFYT8147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The disciplines of crisis management, emergency management, business continuity and resilience are at an inflection point. Is the work of professionals in these fields subject to what some have called at recent industry conferences a failure of imagination? Are the tried-and-true methods and activities serving practitioners as well as they always have, or does today's world demand something different? The more important question is: In these conditions, how can crisis leaders do the most good? To answer that question, crisis management professionals may consider shifting their emphasis from planning, training and exercising alone and introducing more explicit focus on the delivery of good decision making - in other words, a transition of emphasis from response planning to more strategic programme management. All crises - whether fast burning, slow burning or creeping - require decision making. Ultimately in the aftermath, organisations and their leaders are judged not only on the outcomes of a crisis response, but on the decisions they made. Furthermore, this judgment is made not only on whether the decisions were right or wrong alone, but also whether they were defensible based on the best available information at the time. In confrontation with these realities, there is a unique role for enterprise crisis teams to define a value proposition along a set of guiding principles. From there, operational execution may be bridged through an integrated crisis management framework. This paper proposes a way forward along these lines. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of business continuity & emergency planning\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"314-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of business continuity & emergency planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.69554/QFYT8147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of business continuity & emergency planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.69554/QFYT8147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

危机管理、应急管理、业务连续性和复原力等学科正处于拐点。这些领域的专业人士的工作是否受到了一些人在最近的行业会议上所说的想象力失败的影响?那些久经考验的方法和活动是否一如既往地服务于从业者,或者今天的世界是否需要一些不同的东西?更重要的问题是:在这种情况下,危机领导者如何才能做到最好?要回答这个问题,危机管理专业人员可能会考虑将他们的重点从单纯的规划、培训和实践转移到更明确地侧重于提供良好的决策——换句话说,将重点从应对规划转移到更具战略性的方案管理。所有危机——无论是快速燃烧、缓慢燃烧还是蔓延——都需要决策。最终,在危机发生后,人们不仅根据危机应对的结果来评判组织及其领导人,还根据他们做出的决定来评判他们。此外,这种判断不仅取决于这些决定本身是对还是错,而且还取决于这些决定是否根据当时可获得的最佳信息进行辩护。在面对这些现实时,企业危机处理团队有一个独特的角色,即根据一组指导原则定义价值主张。在此基础上,可以通过集成的危机管理框架将操作执行连接起来。本文提出了沿着这些方向前进的方法。这篇文章也包含在商业和管理合集中,可以在https://hstalks.com/business/上访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confronting wicked problems and creeping crises: Integrated crisis management.

The disciplines of crisis management, emergency management, business continuity and resilience are at an inflection point. Is the work of professionals in these fields subject to what some have called at recent industry conferences a failure of imagination? Are the tried-and-true methods and activities serving practitioners as well as they always have, or does today's world demand something different? The more important question is: In these conditions, how can crisis leaders do the most good? To answer that question, crisis management professionals may consider shifting their emphasis from planning, training and exercising alone and introducing more explicit focus on the delivery of good decision making - in other words, a transition of emphasis from response planning to more strategic programme management. All crises - whether fast burning, slow burning or creeping - require decision making. Ultimately in the aftermath, organisations and their leaders are judged not only on the outcomes of a crisis response, but on the decisions they made. Furthermore, this judgment is made not only on whether the decisions were right or wrong alone, but also whether they were defensible based on the best available information at the time. In confrontation with these realities, there is a unique role for enterprise crisis teams to define a value proposition along a set of guiding principles. From there, operational execution may be bridged through an integrated crisis management framework. This paper proposes a way forward along these lines. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning is the leading professional journal publishing peer-reviewed articles and case studies written by and for business continuity and emergency managers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信