非营利性医疗保健中的私募股权策略。

Q2 Social Sciences
Zachary J Gallin, Emily L Xu
{"title":"非营利性医疗保健中的私募股权策略。","authors":"Zachary J Gallin, Emily L Xu","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Private equity firms exacerbate health inequity by driving hospital closures in historically underserved communities. Now nonprofit health systems seem to be adopting private equity practices to do the same. Drawing on a case study of one nonprofit hospital system that has adopted private equity business practices to acquire and close community hospitals, this article argues that nonprofit hospitals' adoption of private equity acquisition and closure practices sacrifices their missions, prioritizes profit, and works to the detriment of local communities. This article construes this set of practices as a breach of organizational ethics that must be addressed via policy changes, specifically by placing guardrails on closures and promoting responsible health care investments.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 5","pages":"E354-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Equity Strategies in Nonprofit Health Care.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary J Gallin, Emily L Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Private equity firms exacerbate health inequity by driving hospital closures in historically underserved communities. Now nonprofit health systems seem to be adopting private equity practices to do the same. Drawing on a case study of one nonprofit hospital system that has adopted private equity business practices to acquire and close community hospitals, this article argues that nonprofit hospitals' adoption of private equity acquisition and closure practices sacrifices their missions, prioritizes profit, and works to the detriment of local communities. This article construes this set of practices as a breach of organizational ethics that must be addressed via policy changes, specifically by placing guardrails on closures and promoting responsible health care investments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"E354-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

私募股权公司推动历来服务不足的社区关闭医院,加剧了医疗不平等。现在,非营利性医疗系统似乎也在采用私募股权的做法来做同样的事情。通过对一家采用私募股权收购和关闭社区医院的非营利性医院系统的案例研究,本文认为,非营利性医院采用私募股权收购和关闭实践牺牲了他们的使命,优先考虑利润,并对当地社区造成损害。本文将这组实践解释为违反组织道德,必须通过政策变更来解决,特别是通过对关闭设置护栏和促进负责任的医疗保健投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private Equity Strategies in Nonprofit Health Care.

Private equity firms exacerbate health inequity by driving hospital closures in historically underserved communities. Now nonprofit health systems seem to be adopting private equity practices to do the same. Drawing on a case study of one nonprofit hospital system that has adopted private equity business practices to acquire and close community hospitals, this article argues that nonprofit hospitals' adoption of private equity acquisition and closure practices sacrifices their missions, prioritizes profit, and works to the detriment of local communities. This article construes this set of practices as a breach of organizational ethics that must be addressed via policy changes, specifically by placing guardrails on closures and promoting responsible health care investments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信