非法芬太尼时代大剂量丁丙诺啡处方特征的横断面检查。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Bradley D Stein, Flora Sheng, Brendan K Saloner, Adam J Gordon, Jessica S Merlin
{"title":"非法芬太尼时代大剂量丁丙诺啡处方特征的横断面检查。","authors":"Bradley D Stein, Flora Sheng, Brendan K Saloner, Adam J Gordon, Jessica S Merlin","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00547-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to greater illicit fentanyl use, buprenorphine daily doses exceeding the FDA's recommended target daily dose (16 mg) and maximum suggested daily dose (24 mg) may provide better outcomes, but little is known about higher dosage prescribing patterns. To better understand buprenorphine prescribing patterns, this manuscript examines the frequency and characteristics of dispensed buprenorphine of ≤ 16mg, > 16-24 mg, and > 24 mg daily dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used IQVIA data to conduct a cross-sectional study of opioid use disorder-indicated buprenorphine prescriptions dispensed at retail pharmacies January 2019 - December 2020; categorized prescriptions as ≤ 16mg, > 16 to 24 mg, and > 24 mg daily dose; and examined overall rates and rates by patient, insurer and county characteristics, and prescriber specialty. We categorized buprenorphine prescriptions by patient sex, age cohort, primary payment source, and prescriber specialty and state and conducted univariate and bivariate analyses of buprenorphine daily dose categories overall and among clinicians frequently prescribing buprenorphine at the highest doses, > 24 mg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 19.5% (n = 5,568,964) of the 28 million buprenorphine prescriptions from 68,898 clinicians were > 16-24 mg; 2% (n = 641,390) were > 24 mg. Approximately 26% (n = 17,939) of clinicians wrote at least one prescription > 24 mg; 2,780 clinicians (4% of buprenorphine prescribers) were responsible for 82.2% (n = 527,597) of dispensed prescriptions > 24 mg. 28% of prescriptions > 24 mg written by these prescribers were cash-pay, 12.5% covered by Medicaid, and 6.7% covered by Medicare. There was no correlation between state fentanyl overdose rate and buprenorphine prescriptions > 24 mg per 1,000,000 residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2019-2020, fewer than 3% of dispensed buprenorphine prescriptions exceeded the FDA suggested maximum of 24 mg daily dose; 80% of the prescriptions for a > 24 mg daily dose were written by 4% of buprenorphine prescribers. As clinicians and policymakers pay greater attention to ensuring individuals are receiving buprenorphine dosages adequate to effectively treat their opioid use disorder, the recently revised FDA recommendations may encourage such behavior. Additionally, disproportionate reliance on cash payment for higher daily doses suggests public and private insurers could facilitate access to such treatment when appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-sectional examination of characteristics of higher-dose buprenorphine prescriptions during the era of illicit fentanyl.\",\"authors\":\"Bradley D Stein, Flora Sheng, Brendan K Saloner, Adam J Gordon, Jessica S Merlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-025-00547-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to greater illicit fentanyl use, buprenorphine daily doses exceeding the FDA's recommended target daily dose (16 mg) and maximum suggested daily dose (24 mg) may provide better outcomes, but little is known about higher dosage prescribing patterns. To better understand buprenorphine prescribing patterns, this manuscript examines the frequency and characteristics of dispensed buprenorphine of ≤ 16mg, > 16-24 mg, and > 24 mg daily dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used IQVIA data to conduct a cross-sectional study of opioid use disorder-indicated buprenorphine prescriptions dispensed at retail pharmacies January 2019 - December 2020; categorized prescriptions as ≤ 16mg, > 16 to 24 mg, and > 24 mg daily dose; and examined overall rates and rates by patient, insurer and county characteristics, and prescriber specialty. We categorized buprenorphine prescriptions by patient sex, age cohort, primary payment source, and prescriber specialty and state and conducted univariate and bivariate analyses of buprenorphine daily dose categories overall and among clinicians frequently prescribing buprenorphine at the highest doses, > 24 mg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 19.5% (n = 5,568,964) of the 28 million buprenorphine prescriptions from 68,898 clinicians were > 16-24 mg; 2% (n = 641,390) were > 24 mg. Approximately 26% (n = 17,939) of clinicians wrote at least one prescription > 24 mg; 2,780 clinicians (4% of buprenorphine prescribers) were responsible for 82.2% (n = 527,597) of dispensed prescriptions > 24 mg. 28% of prescriptions > 24 mg written by these prescribers were cash-pay, 12.5% covered by Medicaid, and 6.7% covered by Medicare. There was no correlation between state fentanyl overdose rate and buprenorphine prescriptions > 24 mg per 1,000,000 residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2019-2020, fewer than 3% of dispensed buprenorphine prescriptions exceeded the FDA suggested maximum of 24 mg daily dose; 80% of the prescriptions for a > 24 mg daily dose were written by 4% of buprenorphine prescribers. As clinicians and policymakers pay greater attention to ensuring individuals are receiving buprenorphine dosages adequate to effectively treat their opioid use disorder, the recently revised FDA recommendations may encourage such behavior. Additionally, disproportionate reliance on cash payment for higher daily doses suggests public and private insurers could facilitate access to such treatment when appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00547-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00547-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了应对芬太尼非法使用的增加,丁丙诺啡每日剂量超过FDA推荐的目标每日剂量(16毫克)和最大建议每日剂量(24毫克)可能会提供更好的结果,但对更高剂量的处方模式知之甚少。为了更好地了解丁丙诺啡的处方模式,本文检查了每日剂量≤16mg, > 16- 24mg和> 24mg的丁丙诺啡的分配频率和特征。方法:我们使用IQVIA数据对2019年1月至2020年12月在零售药店配药的阿片类药物使用障碍丁丙诺啡处方进行横断面研究;将处方分为≤16mg, > 16 ~ 24mg, > 24mg每日剂量;然后根据病人,保险公司,县的特点,以及医生的专业来检查总体的比率。我们将丁丙诺啡处方按患者性别、年龄队列、主要支付来源、开处方者专业和州进行分类,并对总体丁丙诺啡日剂量类别和经常开丁丙诺啡最高剂量(bb0 - 24mg)的临床医生进行单因素和双因素分析。结果:来自68,898名临床医生的2800万张丁丙诺啡处方中,约有19.5% (n = 5,568,964)为bb0 16-24 mg;2% (n = 641,390)为24 mg。约26% (n = 17,939)的临床医生至少开了一个处方> 24mg;2780名临床医生(占丁丙诺啡处方者的4%)负责82.2% (n = 527,597)的配发处方bbb24 mg。这些开处方者开出的处方中,28%为现金支付,12.5%为医疗补助,6.7%为医疗保险。芬太尼药物过量率与丁丙诺啡处方(每100万居民服用24毫克)之间没有相关性。结论:2019-2020年,只有不到3%的丁丙诺啡处方超过了FDA建议的最大每日24mg剂量;80%的每日24mg剂量的处方是4%的丁丙诺啡处方者开的。随着临床医生和政策制定者更加重视确保个人接受丁丙诺啡剂量足以有效治疗阿片类药物使用障碍,最近修订的FDA建议可能会鼓励这种行为。此外,过高的日剂量对现金支付的过度依赖表明,公共和私营保险公司可以在适当情况下为获得这种治疗提供便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-sectional examination of characteristics of higher-dose buprenorphine prescriptions during the era of illicit fentanyl.

Background: In response to greater illicit fentanyl use, buprenorphine daily doses exceeding the FDA's recommended target daily dose (16 mg) and maximum suggested daily dose (24 mg) may provide better outcomes, but little is known about higher dosage prescribing patterns. To better understand buprenorphine prescribing patterns, this manuscript examines the frequency and characteristics of dispensed buprenorphine of ≤ 16mg, > 16-24 mg, and > 24 mg daily dose.

Methods: We used IQVIA data to conduct a cross-sectional study of opioid use disorder-indicated buprenorphine prescriptions dispensed at retail pharmacies January 2019 - December 2020; categorized prescriptions as ≤ 16mg, > 16 to 24 mg, and > 24 mg daily dose; and examined overall rates and rates by patient, insurer and county characteristics, and prescriber specialty. We categorized buprenorphine prescriptions by patient sex, age cohort, primary payment source, and prescriber specialty and state and conducted univariate and bivariate analyses of buprenorphine daily dose categories overall and among clinicians frequently prescribing buprenorphine at the highest doses, > 24 mg.

Results: Approximately 19.5% (n = 5,568,964) of the 28 million buprenorphine prescriptions from 68,898 clinicians were > 16-24 mg; 2% (n = 641,390) were > 24 mg. Approximately 26% (n = 17,939) of clinicians wrote at least one prescription > 24 mg; 2,780 clinicians (4% of buprenorphine prescribers) were responsible for 82.2% (n = 527,597) of dispensed prescriptions > 24 mg. 28% of prescriptions > 24 mg written by these prescribers were cash-pay, 12.5% covered by Medicaid, and 6.7% covered by Medicare. There was no correlation between state fentanyl overdose rate and buprenorphine prescriptions > 24 mg per 1,000,000 residents.

Conclusions: In 2019-2020, fewer than 3% of dispensed buprenorphine prescriptions exceeded the FDA suggested maximum of 24 mg daily dose; 80% of the prescriptions for a > 24 mg daily dose were written by 4% of buprenorphine prescribers. As clinicians and policymakers pay greater attention to ensuring individuals are receiving buprenorphine dosages adequate to effectively treat their opioid use disorder, the recently revised FDA recommendations may encourage such behavior. Additionally, disproportionate reliance on cash payment for higher daily doses suggests public and private insurers could facilitate access to such treatment when appropriate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信