癫痫持续状态患者的剂量不足和药物治疗反应:一项来自沙特阿拉伯的回顾性研究。

Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-03 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2496797
Sultan M Alghadeer, Aseel Alsuwayegh, Hessa AlMuqati, Maha A Alammari, Omar A Almohammed
{"title":"癫痫持续状态患者的剂量不足和药物治疗反应:一项来自沙特阿拉伯的回顾性研究。","authors":"Sultan M Alghadeer, Aseel Alsuwayegh, Hessa AlMuqati, Maha A Alammari, Omar A Almohammed","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2496797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the essential of understanding patterns of status epilepticus (SE) and investigating appropriate therapy for these patients, such data are limited in the Saudi population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study including adult patients who were admitted to emergency departments (EDs) in two hospitals due to SE was conducted between May 2015 and July 2021. We aimed to describe the characteristics for patients who were admitted to ED with SE, describe the pattern of pharmacotherapy used in these patients, assess patients' response to these pharmacotherapy agents in different stages and investigate reasons for treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 420 SE episodes that received at least one dose of benzodiazepines (BDZs) or anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in ED were included. The mean age for them was 38.7 ±19.1 years and 89.0% had a history of epilepsy . BDZs or ASMs were used on first trial in 60.0% and 40.0% of episodes; and 20.6% and 84.5% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) of these cases responded, respectively. The overall response to BDZs in all trials was 24.8% while it was 79.1% for the ASMs. The issue of under-dosing was more prevalent in BDZs' compared to ASMs trials (63.4% vs. 19.6%) and was significantly associated with lack of response to therapy (86.6% vs. 0.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an immanent need for educational, drug regulation awareness programs, and protocols enforcement policies that aims to optimize patient care by improving physicians' adherence to clinical guidelines' recommendations to improve the status of managing patients with SE in Saudi Arabia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2496797"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underdosing and response to pharmacotherapy in patients with status epilepticus: a retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Sultan M Alghadeer, Aseel Alsuwayegh, Hessa AlMuqati, Maha A Alammari, Omar A Almohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2025.2496797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the essential of understanding patterns of status epilepticus (SE) and investigating appropriate therapy for these patients, such data are limited in the Saudi population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study including adult patients who were admitted to emergency departments (EDs) in two hospitals due to SE was conducted between May 2015 and July 2021. We aimed to describe the characteristics for patients who were admitted to ED with SE, describe the pattern of pharmacotherapy used in these patients, assess patients' response to these pharmacotherapy agents in different stages and investigate reasons for treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 420 SE episodes that received at least one dose of benzodiazepines (BDZs) or anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in ED were included. The mean age for them was 38.7 ±19.1 years and 89.0% had a history of epilepsy . BDZs or ASMs were used on first trial in 60.0% and 40.0% of episodes; and 20.6% and 84.5% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) of these cases responded, respectively. The overall response to BDZs in all trials was 24.8% while it was 79.1% for the ASMs. The issue of under-dosing was more prevalent in BDZs' compared to ASMs trials (63.4% vs. 19.6%) and was significantly associated with lack of response to therapy (86.6% vs. 0.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an immanent need for educational, drug regulation awareness programs, and protocols enforcement policies that aims to optimize patient care by improving physicians' adherence to clinical guidelines' recommendations to improve the status of managing patients with SE in Saudi Arabia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"2496797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2496797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2496797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有必要了解癫痫持续状态(SE)的模式并研究这些患者的适当治疗方法,但这些数据在沙特人群中是有限的。方法:对2015年5月至2021年7月在两家医院因SE入院的成年患者进行回顾性研究。我们的目的是描述ED合并SE患者的特征,描述这些患者使用的药物治疗模式,评估患者在不同阶段对这些药物治疗药物的反应,并探讨治疗失败的原因。结果:共纳入420例SE发作,在ED中接受了至少一剂量的苯二氮卓类药物(BDZs)或抗癫痫药物(asm)。平均年龄38.7±19.1岁,89.0%有癫痫史。在第一次试验中分别有60.0%和40.0%的发作使用BDZs或asm;结论:迫切需要开展教育、药品监管意识项目和协议执行政策,通过提高医生对临床指南建议的依从性来优化患者护理,从而改善沙特阿拉伯SE患者的管理状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Underdosing and response to pharmacotherapy in patients with status epilepticus: a retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.

Background: Despite the essential of understanding patterns of status epilepticus (SE) and investigating appropriate therapy for these patients, such data are limited in the Saudi population.

Methods: A retrospective study including adult patients who were admitted to emergency departments (EDs) in two hospitals due to SE was conducted between May 2015 and July 2021. We aimed to describe the characteristics for patients who were admitted to ED with SE, describe the pattern of pharmacotherapy used in these patients, assess patients' response to these pharmacotherapy agents in different stages and investigate reasons for treatment failure.

Results: A total of 420 SE episodes that received at least one dose of benzodiazepines (BDZs) or anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in ED were included. The mean age for them was 38.7 ±19.1 years and 89.0% had a history of epilepsy . BDZs or ASMs were used on first trial in 60.0% and 40.0% of episodes; and 20.6% and 84.5% (p < 0.0001) of these cases responded, respectively. The overall response to BDZs in all trials was 24.8% while it was 79.1% for the ASMs. The issue of under-dosing was more prevalent in BDZs' compared to ASMs trials (63.4% vs. 19.6%) and was significantly associated with lack of response to therapy (86.6% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: There is an immanent need for educational, drug regulation awareness programs, and protocols enforcement policies that aims to optimize patient care by improving physicians' adherence to clinical guidelines' recommendations to improve the status of managing patients with SE in Saudi Arabia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信