{"title":"老化的大脑:皮质过度激活——它是如何进化的?","authors":"Wolfgang Taube, Benedikt Lauber","doi":"10.1113/JP286891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is overwhelming evidence for an age-related change in brain activity when performing motor and motor-cognitive tasks (i.e. dual-tasking). In general this research shows increased cortical activity, i.e. cortical overactivation, and, less evident, subcortical deactivation in the healthy brains of older compared to young adults. Furthermore brain network activity becomes less distinct and less segregated. Interestingly from a behavioural point of view some of these adaptations seem helpful, leading to better motor performances than in age-matched seniors, but others are related to inferior performance. Current theories try to explain these findings, therefore, either in favour of compensatory strategies or in terms of non-selective, inefficient (dedifferentiated) brain activation. However the limitation of current theories is that they are 'static', considering only one point in time instead of age-related progression of brain activity over time. In contrast this review article proposes a developmental process, from compensation to negative overcompensation to chronic maladaptive overcompensation, which leads to dedifferentiation and desegregation. In addition this article highlights that elderly subjects utilize motor control strategies, such as increased cortical activity, down-regulation of inhibitory processes and less-segregated and lateralized brain activation patterns, that are also commonly found in healthy young adults when task challenges increase. Thus many findings about differences in brain activation may result from the fact that although 'absolute task difficulty' remains the same, 'relative task difficulty' increases for the older subjects, forcing them to apply the above-mentioned neural activation strategies. This initially compensatory strategy can, however, turn into non-efficient brain activation over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re: JP-TR-2024-286891 'The ageing brain: Cortical overactivation - How does it evolve?'\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Taube, Benedikt Lauber\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP286891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is overwhelming evidence for an age-related change in brain activity when performing motor and motor-cognitive tasks (i.e. dual-tasking). In general this research shows increased cortical activity, i.e. cortical overactivation, and, less evident, subcortical deactivation in the healthy brains of older compared to young adults. Furthermore brain network activity becomes less distinct and less segregated. Interestingly from a behavioural point of view some of these adaptations seem helpful, leading to better motor performances than in age-matched seniors, but others are related to inferior performance. Current theories try to explain these findings, therefore, either in favour of compensatory strategies or in terms of non-selective, inefficient (dedifferentiated) brain activation. However the limitation of current theories is that they are 'static', considering only one point in time instead of age-related progression of brain activity over time. In contrast this review article proposes a developmental process, from compensation to negative overcompensation to chronic maladaptive overcompensation, which leads to dedifferentiation and desegregation. In addition this article highlights that elderly subjects utilize motor control strategies, such as increased cortical activity, down-regulation of inhibitory processes and less-segregated and lateralized brain activation patterns, that are also commonly found in healthy young adults when task challenges increase. Thus many findings about differences in brain activation may result from the fact that although 'absolute task difficulty' remains the same, 'relative task difficulty' increases for the older subjects, forcing them to apply the above-mentioned neural activation strategies. This initially compensatory strategy can, however, turn into non-efficient brain activation over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP286891\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP286891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Re: JP-TR-2024-286891 'The ageing brain: Cortical overactivation - How does it evolve?'
There is overwhelming evidence for an age-related change in brain activity when performing motor and motor-cognitive tasks (i.e. dual-tasking). In general this research shows increased cortical activity, i.e. cortical overactivation, and, less evident, subcortical deactivation in the healthy brains of older compared to young adults. Furthermore brain network activity becomes less distinct and less segregated. Interestingly from a behavioural point of view some of these adaptations seem helpful, leading to better motor performances than in age-matched seniors, but others are related to inferior performance. Current theories try to explain these findings, therefore, either in favour of compensatory strategies or in terms of non-selective, inefficient (dedifferentiated) brain activation. However the limitation of current theories is that they are 'static', considering only one point in time instead of age-related progression of brain activity over time. In contrast this review article proposes a developmental process, from compensation to negative overcompensation to chronic maladaptive overcompensation, which leads to dedifferentiation and desegregation. In addition this article highlights that elderly subjects utilize motor control strategies, such as increased cortical activity, down-regulation of inhibitory processes and less-segregated and lateralized brain activation patterns, that are also commonly found in healthy young adults when task challenges increase. Thus many findings about differences in brain activation may result from the fact that although 'absolute task difficulty' remains the same, 'relative task difficulty' increases for the older subjects, forcing them to apply the above-mentioned neural activation strategies. This initially compensatory strategy can, however, turn into non-efficient brain activation over time.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew.
The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.