急性表现老年患者筛查对COVID-19住院老年患者短期死亡率预测的验证

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rosalinde A L Smits, Bas F M van Raaij, Steffy W M Jansen, Jessica M van der Bol, Carolien M J van der Linden, Harmke A Polinder-Bos, Hanna C Willems, Ewout W Steyerberg, Maarten van Smeden, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Simon P Mooijaart, Stella Trompet
{"title":"急性表现老年患者筛查对COVID-19住院老年患者短期死亡率预测的验证","authors":"Rosalinde A L Smits, Bas F M van Raaij, Steffy W M Jansen, Jessica M van der Bol, Carolien M J van der Linden, Harmke A Polinder-Bos, Hanna C Willems, Ewout W Steyerberg, Maarten van Smeden, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Simon P Mooijaart, Stella Trompet","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01200-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screener, routinely used on the Emergency Department to predict risk of adverse outcomes in older people, for prediction of in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality in older patients hospitalized for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients ≥ 70 years from a multicenter cohort hospitalized for COVID-19 with measured APOP risk were included. External validation analysis of the APOP screener for in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality was performed including discrimination and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>389 patients (median age 80 (IQR 75-85) years, 41.4% female, 138 APOP high risk) were included. APOP high risk patients more often lived institutionalized, (26% vs. 4%; p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 (1-3) vs. 2 (0-3); p = 0.002) and were less often fit (Clinical Frailty Scale 1-3 17% vs. 62%; p < 0.001). 84 patients died in hospital and 114 within 30 days. APOP high risk patients had a higher risk of in-hospital-death [OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.6)] and death within 30 days [OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.7-4.2)]. The APOP screener discriminated poorly for in-hospital mortality [AUC 0.56 (95% CI 0.48-0.63)] and for 30-days-mortality [AUC 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.68)]. Calibration plots revealed overestimation of the screener for both mortality risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The APOP screener had a poor predictive performance for in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality in older people hospitalized for COVID-19. Screening tools routinely used on the ED may not be useful to predict mortality in different than usual clinical circumstances such as during a pandemic of a novel disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the acutely presenting older patient screener for short term mortality prediction in older patients hospitalized for COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Rosalinde A L Smits, Bas F M van Raaij, Steffy W M Jansen, Jessica M van der Bol, Carolien M J van der Linden, Harmke A Polinder-Bos, Hanna C Willems, Ewout W Steyerberg, Maarten van Smeden, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Simon P Mooijaart, Stella Trompet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41999-025-01200-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screener, routinely used on the Emergency Department to predict risk of adverse outcomes in older people, for prediction of in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality in older patients hospitalized for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients ≥ 70 years from a multicenter cohort hospitalized for COVID-19 with measured APOP risk were included. External validation analysis of the APOP screener for in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality was performed including discrimination and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>389 patients (median age 80 (IQR 75-85) years, 41.4% female, 138 APOP high risk) were included. APOP high risk patients more often lived institutionalized, (26% vs. 4%; p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 (1-3) vs. 2 (0-3); p = 0.002) and were less often fit (Clinical Frailty Scale 1-3 17% vs. 62%; p < 0.001). 84 patients died in hospital and 114 within 30 days. APOP high risk patients had a higher risk of in-hospital-death [OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.6)] and death within 30 days [OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.7-4.2)]. The APOP screener discriminated poorly for in-hospital mortality [AUC 0.56 (95% CI 0.48-0.63)] and for 30-days-mortality [AUC 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.68)]. Calibration plots revealed overestimation of the screener for both mortality risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The APOP screener had a poor predictive performance for in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality in older people hospitalized for COVID-19. Screening tools routinely used on the ED may not be useful to predict mortality in different than usual clinical circumstances such as during a pandemic of a novel disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01200-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01200-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是验证急诊科常规用于预测老年人不良结局风险的急性表现老年患者(APOP)筛查,以预测因COVID-19住院的老年患者的住院死亡率和30天死亡率。方法:纳入来自COVID-19住院的多中心队列中年龄≥70岁且测量了APOP风险的患者。对APOP筛选器进行住院死亡率和30天死亡率的外部验证分析,包括区分和校准。结果:纳入389例患者(中位年龄80 (IQR 75 ~ 85)岁,女性41.4%,APOP高危患者138例)。APOP高危患者更常住在机构中(26% vs. 4%;结论:APOP筛查对因COVID-19住院的老年人的住院死亡率和30天死亡率的预测效果较差。在不同于通常的临床情况下,如在一种新疾病的大流行期间,在急诊科常规使用的筛查工具可能对预测死亡率没有用处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the acutely presenting older patient screener for short term mortality prediction in older patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to validate the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screener, routinely used on the Emergency Department to predict risk of adverse outcomes in older people, for prediction of in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality in older patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Methods: Patients ≥ 70 years from a multicenter cohort hospitalized for COVID-19 with measured APOP risk were included. External validation analysis of the APOP screener for in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality was performed including discrimination and calibration.

Results: 389 patients (median age 80 (IQR 75-85) years, 41.4% female, 138 APOP high risk) were included. APOP high risk patients more often lived institutionalized, (26% vs. 4%; p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 (1-3) vs. 2 (0-3); p = 0.002) and were less often fit (Clinical Frailty Scale 1-3 17% vs. 62%; p < 0.001). 84 patients died in hospital and 114 within 30 days. APOP high risk patients had a higher risk of in-hospital-death [OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.6)] and death within 30 days [OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.7-4.2)]. The APOP screener discriminated poorly for in-hospital mortality [AUC 0.56 (95% CI 0.48-0.63)] and for 30-days-mortality [AUC 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.68)]. Calibration plots revealed overestimation of the screener for both mortality risks.

Conclusion: The APOP screener had a poor predictive performance for in-hospital mortality and 30-days-mortality in older people hospitalized for COVID-19. Screening tools routinely used on the ED may not be useful to predict mortality in different than usual clinical circumstances such as during a pandemic of a novel disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信