社会影响对坦桑尼亚COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫和接受的作用

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i3.704
Magolanga Shagembe, Chima E Onuekwe, Egidius Kamanyi, Ambrose T Kessy, Tumaini Haonga, William M Mwengee
{"title":"社会影响对坦桑尼亚COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫和接受的作用","authors":"Magolanga Shagembe, Chima E Onuekwe, Egidius Kamanyi, Ambrose T Kessy, Tumaini Haonga, William M Mwengee","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i3.704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance remain critical public health concerns, influenced by socio-cultural factors globally. Social influence - particularly conformity, compliance and obedience - influence vaccination intentions, decisions and behaviours based on the information circulated by the people already vaccinated. Understanding these dynamics is essential for promotion vaccine uptake through reassuring the hesitant about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We explored the influence of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Our study was conducted in eight regions of Mainland Tanzania: Arusha, Morogoro, Mtwara, Njombe, Mbeya, Tabora, Singida and Shinyanga, to represent eight zones of Mainland Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted a mixed-methods research approach, to collect data from 3098 respondents for a quantitative part, and 336 key informants as well as 376 participants for focus group discussions. Data analysis involved both descriptive and inferential statistics for quantitative data as well as thematic analysis for qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was regional variation in vaccination rates, with Mtwara and Singida showing high acceptance at 50% and 49.7%, respectively, while Morogoro (22.5%) and Mbeya (26.2%) showed lower rates. Social influence, especially friends, family, and community discussions, and trust in the government as a reliable source of information regarding the COVID-19 vaccination were key. Changes in the Tanzanian government's political will also contributed to positive attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social influence influenced COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Tanzania, requiring tailored public health strategies involving the government, trusted community figures and considering social ties and social interaction to boost vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Our study offers insights on the critical role of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance; hence, a necessity for socio-cultural context-specific and participatory interventions in a quest to reduce COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and improve acceptance in the Tanzanian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 3","pages":"704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance in Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Magolanga Shagembe, Chima E Onuekwe, Egidius Kamanyi, Ambrose T Kessy, Tumaini Haonga, William M Mwengee\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/jphia.v16i3.704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance remain critical public health concerns, influenced by socio-cultural factors globally. Social influence - particularly conformity, compliance and obedience - influence vaccination intentions, decisions and behaviours based on the information circulated by the people already vaccinated. Understanding these dynamics is essential for promotion vaccine uptake through reassuring the hesitant about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We explored the influence of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Our study was conducted in eight regions of Mainland Tanzania: Arusha, Morogoro, Mtwara, Njombe, Mbeya, Tabora, Singida and Shinyanga, to represent eight zones of Mainland Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted a mixed-methods research approach, to collect data from 3098 respondents for a quantitative part, and 336 key informants as well as 376 participants for focus group discussions. Data analysis involved both descriptive and inferential statistics for quantitative data as well as thematic analysis for qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was regional variation in vaccination rates, with Mtwara and Singida showing high acceptance at 50% and 49.7%, respectively, while Morogoro (22.5%) and Mbeya (26.2%) showed lower rates. Social influence, especially friends, family, and community discussions, and trust in the government as a reliable source of information regarding the COVID-19 vaccination were key. Changes in the Tanzanian government's political will also contributed to positive attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social influence influenced COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Tanzania, requiring tailored public health strategies involving the government, trusted community figures and considering social ties and social interaction to boost vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Our study offers insights on the critical role of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance; hence, a necessity for socio-cultural context-specific and participatory interventions in a quest to reduce COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and improve acceptance in the Tanzanian context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health in Africa\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i3.704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i3.704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:受全球社会文化因素影响,COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫和接受仍然是重要的公共卫生问题。社会影响——特别是顺从、遵守和服从——会根据已经接种疫苗的人传播的信息影响疫苗接种的意图、决定和行为。通过消除对疫苗安全性和有效性的疑虑,了解这些动态对于促进疫苗接种至关重要。目的:探讨社会影响对坦桑尼亚COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫和接受程度的影响。环境:我们的研究在坦桑尼亚大陆的八个地区进行:阿鲁沙、莫罗戈罗、姆特瓦拉、恩琼贝、姆贝亚、塔博拉、辛吉达和辛扬加,代表坦桑尼亚大陆的八个地区。方法:采用混合方法的研究方法,收集3098名受访者的数据作为定量部分,收集336名关键线人和376名焦点小组讨论参与者的数据。数据分析包括定量数据的描述性和推断性统计以及定性数据的专题分析。结果:疫苗接种率存在地区差异,Mtwara和Singida的接种率较高,分别为50%和49.7%,Morogoro和Mbeya的接种率较低,分别为22.5%和26.2%。社会影响力,特别是朋友、家人和社区讨论,以及对政府作为COVID-19疫苗接种可靠信息来源的信任是关键。坦桑尼亚政府政治意愿的变化也促成了对COVID-19疫苗接种接受度的积极态度。结论:社会影响影响了坦桑尼亚COVID-19疫苗接种的接受程度,需要制定有针对性的公共卫生战略,包括政府、值得信赖的社区人物,并考虑社会关系和社会互动,以提高疫苗接种率。贡献:我们的研究揭示了社会影响对COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫和接受的关键作用;因此,有必要采取针对社会文化背景的参与性干预措施,以减少对COVID-19疫苗接种的犹豫,并提高坦桑尼亚民众对疫苗的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance in Tanzania.

Background: COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance remain critical public health concerns, influenced by socio-cultural factors globally. Social influence - particularly conformity, compliance and obedience - influence vaccination intentions, decisions and behaviours based on the information circulated by the people already vaccinated. Understanding these dynamics is essential for promotion vaccine uptake through reassuring the hesitant about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.

Aim: We explored the influence of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance in Tanzania.

Setting: Our study was conducted in eight regions of Mainland Tanzania: Arusha, Morogoro, Mtwara, Njombe, Mbeya, Tabora, Singida and Shinyanga, to represent eight zones of Mainland Tanzania.

Methods: We adopted a mixed-methods research approach, to collect data from 3098 respondents for a quantitative part, and 336 key informants as well as 376 participants for focus group discussions. Data analysis involved both descriptive and inferential statistics for quantitative data as well as thematic analysis for qualitative data.

Results: There was regional variation in vaccination rates, with Mtwara and Singida showing high acceptance at 50% and 49.7%, respectively, while Morogoro (22.5%) and Mbeya (26.2%) showed lower rates. Social influence, especially friends, family, and community discussions, and trust in the government as a reliable source of information regarding the COVID-19 vaccination were key. Changes in the Tanzanian government's political will also contributed to positive attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.

Conclusion: Social influence influenced COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Tanzania, requiring tailored public health strategies involving the government, trusted community figures and considering social ties and social interaction to boost vaccination rates.

Contribution: Our study offers insights on the critical role of social influence on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and acceptance; hence, a necessity for socio-cultural context-specific and participatory interventions in a quest to reduce COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and improve acceptance in the Tanzanian context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信