加拿大门诊门诊手术中心安全吗?对2596例连续美容手术患者的评价。

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojaf020
Natalia Ziolkowski, John Milkovich, Jamil Ahmad, Elizabeth Benakopoulos, Frank Lista, Ryan E Austin
{"title":"加拿大门诊门诊手术中心安全吗?对2596例连续美容手术患者的评价。","authors":"Natalia Ziolkowski, John Milkovich, Jamil Ahmad, Elizabeth Benakopoulos, Frank Lista, Ryan E Austin","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) with same-day discharge criteria are the most common setting for aesthetic surgery in Canada. However, to date, no study has reviewed the safety of outpatient aesthetic surgery performed in the Canadian ASC setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall safety profile of aesthetic surgery in ASCs, to determine how often in-hospital resources were utilized following outpatient aesthetic surgery, and to examine how predictor variables impact adverse outcomes in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of 2596 consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic surgery over a 40-month period at a single Canadian ASC was performed. Data extracted included demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2581 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (91.2%) with a mean age of 37.6 years (range, 18-85 years). Most patients had a BMI in the normal weight range (56.3%), and 70.0% were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I score. Patients predominantly underwent breast/chest surgery (60.3%) with a procedure duration under 2 h (59.2%). Mean postanesthesia care unit time was 109 min (range, 72-420 min). In total, 10 patients (0.4%) utilized hospital resources in the postoperative period, with 3 (0.1%) direct hospital transfers from the ASC. No patients underwent reoperation in the hospital setting. Overall, 67 (2.4%) patients experienced complications that were managed within the ASC setting. Combined procedures (<i>P</i> = .1367), lipoaspirate volume (<i>P</i> = .53) and procedure duration (<i>P</i> = .92) were not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aesthetic surgery in the ASC setting is safe, with a low associated complication rate. Utilization of hospital resources in the postoperative period is rare.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 4 risk: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"7 ","pages":"ojaf020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Canadian Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery Centers Safe? An Assessment of 2596 Consecutive Aesthetic Surgery Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Ziolkowski, John Milkovich, Jamil Ahmad, Elizabeth Benakopoulos, Frank Lista, Ryan E Austin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asjof/ojaf020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) with same-day discharge criteria are the most common setting for aesthetic surgery in Canada. However, to date, no study has reviewed the safety of outpatient aesthetic surgery performed in the Canadian ASC setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall safety profile of aesthetic surgery in ASCs, to determine how often in-hospital resources were utilized following outpatient aesthetic surgery, and to examine how predictor variables impact adverse outcomes in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of 2596 consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic surgery over a 40-month period at a single Canadian ASC was performed. Data extracted included demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2581 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (91.2%) with a mean age of 37.6 years (range, 18-85 years). Most patients had a BMI in the normal weight range (56.3%), and 70.0% were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I score. Patients predominantly underwent breast/chest surgery (60.3%) with a procedure duration under 2 h (59.2%). Mean postanesthesia care unit time was 109 min (range, 72-420 min). In total, 10 patients (0.4%) utilized hospital resources in the postoperative period, with 3 (0.1%) direct hospital transfers from the ASC. No patients underwent reoperation in the hospital setting. Overall, 67 (2.4%) patients experienced complications that were managed within the ASC setting. Combined procedures (<i>P</i> = .1367), lipoaspirate volume (<i>P</i> = .53) and procedure duration (<i>P</i> = .92) were not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aesthetic surgery in the ASC setting is safe, with a low associated complication rate. Utilization of hospital resources in the postoperative period is rare.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 4 risk: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"ojaf020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065002/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当天出院标准的门诊手术中心(ASCs)是加拿大最常见的美容手术设置。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究回顾了在加拿大ASC环境下进行的门诊美容手术的安全性。目的:本研究的目的是评估ASCs美容手术的总体安全性,确定门诊美容手术后使用院内资源的频率,并检查预测变量如何影响这种情况下的不良结局。方法:对在加拿大一家ASC连续接受40个月美容手术的2596例患者进行回顾性分析。提取的数据包括人口统计学、手术细节和术后并发症。结果:2581例患者符合纳入标准。大多数患者为女性(91.2%),平均年龄37.6岁(18-85岁)。大多数患者的BMI在正常体重范围内(56.3%),70.0%的患者被归类为美国麻醉医师学会I级评分。患者主要接受乳房/胸部手术(60.3%),手术时间少于2小时(59.2%)。平均麻醉后护理时间为109分钟(范围72-420分钟)。总共有10名患者(0.4%)在术后使用了医院资源,3名患者(0.1%)直接从ASC转到医院。无患者在医院再次手术。总体而言,67例(2.4%)患者出现并发症,并在ASC环境下得到控制。联合手术(P = 0.1367)、吸脂量(P = 0.53)和手术时间(P = 0.92)与不良结局风险增加无关。结论:在ASC环境下进行美容手术是安全的,并发症发生率低。术后对医院资源的利用很少。证据4级风险:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Canadian Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery Centers Safe? An Assessment of 2596 Consecutive Aesthetic Surgery Patients.

Background: Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) with same-day discharge criteria are the most common setting for aesthetic surgery in Canada. However, to date, no study has reviewed the safety of outpatient aesthetic surgery performed in the Canadian ASC setting.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall safety profile of aesthetic surgery in ASCs, to determine how often in-hospital resources were utilized following outpatient aesthetic surgery, and to examine how predictor variables impact adverse outcomes in this setting.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of 2596 consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic surgery over a 40-month period at a single Canadian ASC was performed. Data extracted included demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 2581 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (91.2%) with a mean age of 37.6 years (range, 18-85 years). Most patients had a BMI in the normal weight range (56.3%), and 70.0% were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I score. Patients predominantly underwent breast/chest surgery (60.3%) with a procedure duration under 2 h (59.2%). Mean postanesthesia care unit time was 109 min (range, 72-420 min). In total, 10 patients (0.4%) utilized hospital resources in the postoperative period, with 3 (0.1%) direct hospital transfers from the ASC. No patients underwent reoperation in the hospital setting. Overall, 67 (2.4%) patients experienced complications that were managed within the ASC setting. Combined procedures (P = .1367), lipoaspirate volume (P = .53) and procedure duration (P = .92) were not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Conclusions: Aesthetic surgery in the ASC setting is safe, with a low associated complication rate. Utilization of hospital resources in the postoperative period is rare.

Level of evidence 4 risk:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信