评论:修复磨损?对米林科维奇和赫尔利的回应。

Q2 Medicine
Stephen Duckett
{"title":"评论:修复磨损?对米林科维奇和赫尔利的回应。","authors":"Stephen Duckett","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Privatization - either of funding or provision - is not a solution to Canada's health system woes. However, access issues abound, and part - but only part - of the solution should be to look to improve efficiency of service delivery so that better access can be achieved with the same money.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 2","pages":"41-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary: Fixing Fraying? A Response to Milinkovic and Hurley.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Duckett\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Privatization - either of funding or provision - is not a solution to Canada's health system woes. However, access issues abound, and part - but only part - of the solution should be to look to improve efficiency of service delivery so that better access can be achieved with the same money.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"41-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

私有化——无论是资金还是提供——都不是解决加拿大医疗体系困境的办法。然而,获取服务的问题很多,解决方案的一部分——但只是一部分——应该着眼于提高服务提供的效率,以便用同样的资金实现更好的获取服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commentary: Fixing Fraying? A Response to Milinkovic and Hurley.

Privatization - either of funding or provision - is not a solution to Canada's health system woes. However, access issues abound, and part - but only part - of the solution should be to look to improve efficiency of service delivery so that better access can be achieved with the same money.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信