梅尼埃病和前庭偏头痛的多维特征分析:来自机器学习和前庭测试的见解。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Yi Du, Xingjian Liu, Lili Ren, Yu Wang, Ziming Wu
{"title":"梅尼埃病和前庭偏头痛的多维特征分析:来自机器学习和前庭测试的见解。","authors":"Yi Du, Xingjian Liu, Lili Ren, Yu Wang, Ziming Wu","doi":"10.1007/s10162-025-00990-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differentiating between Meniere's disease (MD) and vestibular migraine (VM) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and limited diagnostic tools. Traditional statistical methods often rely on physician judgment and struggle with complex, high-dimensional data. This study applies the random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm to enhance the clinical differentiation between MD and VM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 36 VM (26 female) and 100 unilateral MD patients (51 female). The data were anonymized and labeled. Symptomatic and examination parameters were selected as features, and exploratory data analysis identified key parameters for diagnosis. An RF model was used to rank these features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MD patients more commonly experienced ear-related symptoms, while VM patients reported more headaches and dizziness. Examination findings showed greater asymmetry in vHIT saccade latency in MD patients, particularly on the affected side. A total of 40 key parameters were identified. Heatmap and clustering analysis revealed that time constant (Tc) in velocity step test (VST) correlated more strongly with headache and other symptoms, while saccade latencies and velocities correlated with pure tone averages. The RF model selected 27 parameters for prediction, achieving 91.86% accuracy (95% confidence interval [85.37%, 95.18%]). Tc and saccade velocity were among the top 10 contributing features. Additionally, MD patients had earlier saccades and shorter Tc values on the affected side compared to both healthy controls and VM patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning successfully classified MD and VM patients, with Tc and saccade velocity identified as key diagnostic indicators alongside symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional Feature Analysis of Meniere's Disease and Vestibular Migraine: Insights from Machine Learning and Vestibular Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Du, Xingjian Liu, Lili Ren, Yu Wang, Ziming Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10162-025-00990-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differentiating between Meniere's disease (MD) and vestibular migraine (VM) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and limited diagnostic tools. Traditional statistical methods often rely on physician judgment and struggle with complex, high-dimensional data. This study applies the random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm to enhance the clinical differentiation between MD and VM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 36 VM (26 female) and 100 unilateral MD patients (51 female). The data were anonymized and labeled. Symptomatic and examination parameters were selected as features, and exploratory data analysis identified key parameters for diagnosis. An RF model was used to rank these features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MD patients more commonly experienced ear-related symptoms, while VM patients reported more headaches and dizziness. Examination findings showed greater asymmetry in vHIT saccade latency in MD patients, particularly on the affected side. A total of 40 key parameters were identified. Heatmap and clustering analysis revealed that time constant (Tc) in velocity step test (VST) correlated more strongly with headache and other symptoms, while saccade latencies and velocities correlated with pure tone averages. The RF model selected 27 parameters for prediction, achieving 91.86% accuracy (95% confidence interval [85.37%, 95.18%]). Tc and saccade velocity were among the top 10 contributing features. Additionally, MD patients had earlier saccades and shorter Tc values on the affected side compared to both healthy controls and VM patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning successfully classified MD and VM patients, with Tc and saccade velocity identified as key diagnostic indicators alongside symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-025-00990-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-025-00990-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于症状重叠和诊断工具有限,区分梅尼埃病(MD)和前庭偏头痛(VM)具有挑战性。传统的统计方法往往依赖于医生的判断,难以处理复杂的高维数据。本研究应用随机森林(RF)机器学习算法增强MD与VM的临床鉴别。方法:回顾性分析36例VM(26例女性)和100例单侧MD(51例女性)的资料。这些数据被匿名化并被标记。选取症状和检查参数作为特征,通过探索性数据分析确定诊断的关键参数。使用RF模型对这些特征进行排序。结果:MD患者更常出现耳部相关症状,而VM患者更多报告头痛和头晕。检查结果显示MD患者的vHIT扫视潜伏期更不对称,特别是在患侧。共确定了40个关键参数。热图和聚类分析显示,速度阶跃测试(VST)中的时间常数(Tc)与头痛等症状的相关性更强,而眼跳潜伏期和速度与纯音平均值的相关性更强。RF模型选取27个参数进行预测,准确率为91.86%(95%置信区间[85.37%,95.18%])。Tc和扫视速度位列十大贡献特性之列。此外,与健康对照组和VM患者相比,MD患者有更早的眼跳和更短的Tc值。结论:机器学习成功地对MD和VM患者进行了分类,Tc和扫视速度与症状一起被确定为关键诊断指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidimensional Feature Analysis of Meniere's Disease and Vestibular Migraine: Insights from Machine Learning and Vestibular Testing.

Objective: Differentiating between Meniere's disease (MD) and vestibular migraine (VM) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and limited diagnostic tools. Traditional statistical methods often rely on physician judgment and struggle with complex, high-dimensional data. This study applies the random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm to enhance the clinical differentiation between MD and VM.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 36 VM (26 female) and 100 unilateral MD patients (51 female). The data were anonymized and labeled. Symptomatic and examination parameters were selected as features, and exploratory data analysis identified key parameters for diagnosis. An RF model was used to rank these features.

Results: MD patients more commonly experienced ear-related symptoms, while VM patients reported more headaches and dizziness. Examination findings showed greater asymmetry in vHIT saccade latency in MD patients, particularly on the affected side. A total of 40 key parameters were identified. Heatmap and clustering analysis revealed that time constant (Tc) in velocity step test (VST) correlated more strongly with headache and other symptoms, while saccade latencies and velocities correlated with pure tone averages. The RF model selected 27 parameters for prediction, achieving 91.86% accuracy (95% confidence interval [85.37%, 95.18%]). Tc and saccade velocity were among the top 10 contributing features. Additionally, MD patients had earlier saccades and shorter Tc values on the affected side compared to both healthy controls and VM patients.

Conclusions: Machine learning successfully classified MD and VM patients, with Tc and saccade velocity identified as key diagnostic indicators alongside symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信