Raúl Guzmán Mederos, Mónica Reyes Bello, Julio César Fernández Travieso, Manuel Pedroso Gastón, Sigfredo Calzadilla Feijoo, Miriam Hernández Rech, Maria de Los Angeles Viamontes Lu, Yenney Reyes Nuñez, Jilma Mena Figueroa, Zunilda Rodríguez Suárez, Lai López Rodríguez, Niurka Basulto Turran, Yolanda Cruz Gómez, Meilis Mesa Angarica, Sarahí Mendoza Castaño, Maytee Robaina García, Gladys Jiménez Rivero
{"title":"Palmex®(Roystonea regia脂质提取物)、锯棕榈、非那雄胺和坦索罗辛治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效和耐受性比较研究。","authors":"Raúl Guzmán Mederos, Mónica Reyes Bello, Julio César Fernández Travieso, Manuel Pedroso Gastón, Sigfredo Calzadilla Feijoo, Miriam Hernández Rech, Maria de Los Angeles Viamontes Lu, Yenney Reyes Nuñez, Jilma Mena Figueroa, Zunilda Rodríguez Suárez, Lai López Rodríguez, Niurka Basulto Turran, Yolanda Cruz Gómez, Meilis Mesa Angarica, Sarahí Mendoza Castaño, Maytee Robaina García, Gladys Jiménez Rivero","doi":"10.5152/tud.2025.24067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of the treatment with Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, or tamsulosin administered for 6 months to patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, open, prospective, comparative study was conducted in men !40 years with mild and moderate BPH according to the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (!1, <19). The study included 200 patients (50 per group) who were randomly allocated to receive Palmex® (320 mg/d), saw palmetto (320 mg/d), finasteride (5 mg/d), or tamsulosin (0.4 mg/d). The primary study outcome was the improvement of the maximum urinary flow (Qmax), while significant decreases in IPSS values, prostate size, and residual post-voiding volume were secondary efficacy variables. Statistical analysis was performed according to Intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic baseline characteristics of all the groups were similar. All groups exhibited a significant mean increase in Qmax from baseline to week 24, being 3.8 mL/s (27.7%), 3.6 mL/s (23.1%), 4.2 mL/s (28.6%), and 4.1 mL/s (26.3%) on Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin, respectively. Likewise, all the treatments significantly reduced the IPSS scores by 74.2% (Palmex®), 74.6% (saw palmetto), 60.3% (finasteride), and 74.2% (tamsulosin), also decreasing the prostate size and the residual post-voiding volume. No significant differences among the groups were found regarding any efficacy variable. The treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palmex® for 6 months demonstrated to have a comparable efficacy to saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin in patients with mild and moderate BPH, being safe and well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"50 5","pages":"302-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Palmex® (Roystonea regia Lipid Extract), Saw Palmetto, Finasteride and Tamsulosin in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Raúl Guzmán Mederos, Mónica Reyes Bello, Julio César Fernández Travieso, Manuel Pedroso Gastón, Sigfredo Calzadilla Feijoo, Miriam Hernández Rech, Maria de Los Angeles Viamontes Lu, Yenney Reyes Nuñez, Jilma Mena Figueroa, Zunilda Rodríguez Suárez, Lai López Rodríguez, Niurka Basulto Turran, Yolanda Cruz Gómez, Meilis Mesa Angarica, Sarahí Mendoza Castaño, Maytee Robaina García, Gladys Jiménez Rivero\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tud.2025.24067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of the treatment with Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, or tamsulosin administered for 6 months to patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, open, prospective, comparative study was conducted in men !40 years with mild and moderate BPH according to the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (!1, <19). The study included 200 patients (50 per group) who were randomly allocated to receive Palmex® (320 mg/d), saw palmetto (320 mg/d), finasteride (5 mg/d), or tamsulosin (0.4 mg/d). The primary study outcome was the improvement of the maximum urinary flow (Qmax), while significant decreases in IPSS values, prostate size, and residual post-voiding volume were secondary efficacy variables. Statistical analysis was performed according to Intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic baseline characteristics of all the groups were similar. All groups exhibited a significant mean increase in Qmax from baseline to week 24, being 3.8 mL/s (27.7%), 3.6 mL/s (23.1%), 4.2 mL/s (28.6%), and 4.1 mL/s (26.3%) on Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin, respectively. Likewise, all the treatments significantly reduced the IPSS scores by 74.2% (Palmex®), 74.6% (saw palmetto), 60.3% (finasteride), and 74.2% (tamsulosin), also decreasing the prostate size and the residual post-voiding volume. No significant differences among the groups were found regarding any efficacy variable. The treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palmex® for 6 months demonstrated to have a comparable efficacy to saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin in patients with mild and moderate BPH, being safe and well tolerated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"302-309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923598/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology research & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2025.24067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2025.24067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Palmex® (Roystonea regia Lipid Extract), Saw Palmetto, Finasteride and Tamsulosin in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Objective: Evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of the treatment with Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, or tamsulosin administered for 6 months to patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Methods: This multicenter, open, prospective, comparative study was conducted in men !40 years with mild and moderate BPH according to the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (!1, <19). The study included 200 patients (50 per group) who were randomly allocated to receive Palmex® (320 mg/d), saw palmetto (320 mg/d), finasteride (5 mg/d), or tamsulosin (0.4 mg/d). The primary study outcome was the improvement of the maximum urinary flow (Qmax), while significant decreases in IPSS values, prostate size, and residual post-voiding volume were secondary efficacy variables. Statistical analysis was performed according to Intention to treat.
Results: The demographic baseline characteristics of all the groups were similar. All groups exhibited a significant mean increase in Qmax from baseline to week 24, being 3.8 mL/s (27.7%), 3.6 mL/s (23.1%), 4.2 mL/s (28.6%), and 4.1 mL/s (26.3%) on Palmex®, saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin, respectively. Likewise, all the treatments significantly reduced the IPSS scores by 74.2% (Palmex®), 74.6% (saw palmetto), 60.3% (finasteride), and 74.2% (tamsulosin), also decreasing the prostate size and the residual post-voiding volume. No significant differences among the groups were found regarding any efficacy variable. The treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusion: Palmex® for 6 months demonstrated to have a comparable efficacy to saw palmetto, finasteride, and tamsulosin in patients with mild and moderate BPH, being safe and well tolerated.