元认知、欲望思维和有问题的社交媒体使用:调查Facebook和Instagram用户主动和被动参与的影响。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Scandinavian journal of psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1111/sjop.13119
Andrew Allen, Geraldine Sanders-Westerhof, Azin Khodadadi, Lee Kannis-Dymand
{"title":"元认知、欲望思维和有问题的社交媒体使用:调查Facebook和Instagram用户主动和被动参与的影响。","authors":"Andrew Allen, Geraldine Sanders-Westerhof, Azin Khodadadi, Lee Kannis-Dymand","doi":"10.1111/sjop.13119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aimed to improve the understanding of cognitive and metacognitive processes underlying problematic social media use (PSMU) by comparing active and passive user engagement and contrasting Facebook and Instagram users. The metacognitive model of desire thinking (MCMDT) was utilized to explore these distinctions within a community sample of 337 participants (64% female, M<sub>age</sub> = 36.10). Participants completed self-report measures to assess their metacognitive processes, desire thinking patterns, and social media engagement. The MCMDT demonstrated robust fit across all scenarios, with the most optimal fit for Instagram (χ<sup>2</sup>(3) = 0.850, p = 0.838, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0062, variance explained 59.4%), and the least optimal fit for passive users (χ<sup>2</sup>(3) = 1.151, p = 0.765, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0206, variance explained 45.9%). The initiation and elaboration stages of the MCMDT were supported, but the pathological amplification stage was not. As expected, active users showed better model fit than passive users, and Facebook users had more pronounced verbal perseveration (VP) activation during the elaboration stage. Contrary to expectations, Instagram did not display more pronounced imaginal prefiguration (IP) activation than Facebook. These results enhance understanding of the cognitive and metacognitive processes driving PSMU, which may contribute to developing targeted interventions. Future research should investigate how VP and IP interact with and influence the later stages of the MCMDT of desire thinking across various populations and contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":"766-778"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metacognition, Desire Thinking, and Problematic Social Media Use: Investigating Effects of Active and Passive Engagement in Facebook and Instagram Users.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Allen, Geraldine Sanders-Westerhof, Azin Khodadadi, Lee Kannis-Dymand\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sjop.13119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study aimed to improve the understanding of cognitive and metacognitive processes underlying problematic social media use (PSMU) by comparing active and passive user engagement and contrasting Facebook and Instagram users. The metacognitive model of desire thinking (MCMDT) was utilized to explore these distinctions within a community sample of 337 participants (64% female, M<sub>age</sub> = 36.10). Participants completed self-report measures to assess their metacognitive processes, desire thinking patterns, and social media engagement. The MCMDT demonstrated robust fit across all scenarios, with the most optimal fit for Instagram (χ<sup>2</sup>(3) = 0.850, p = 0.838, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0062, variance explained 59.4%), and the least optimal fit for passive users (χ<sup>2</sup>(3) = 1.151, p = 0.765, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0206, variance explained 45.9%). The initiation and elaboration stages of the MCMDT were supported, but the pathological amplification stage was not. As expected, active users showed better model fit than passive users, and Facebook users had more pronounced verbal perseveration (VP) activation during the elaboration stage. Contrary to expectations, Instagram did not display more pronounced imaginal prefiguration (IP) activation than Facebook. These results enhance understanding of the cognitive and metacognitive processes driving PSMU, which may contribute to developing targeted interventions. Future research should investigate how VP and IP interact with and influence the later stages of the MCMDT of desire thinking across various populations and contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"766-778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13119\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究旨在通过比较主动和被动用户参与以及对比Facebook和Instagram用户,提高对问题社交媒体使用(PSMU)背后的认知和元认知过程的理解。利用欲望思维元认知模型(MCMDT)在337名参与者的社区样本中探索这些差异(64%为女性,Mage = 36.10)。参与者完成了自我报告测量,以评估他们的元认知过程、欲望思维模式和社交媒体参与度。MCMDT在所有场景中都表现出稳健的拟合,Instagram的拟合效果最佳(χ2(3) = 0.850, p = 0.838, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0062,方差解释率为59.4%),被动用户的拟合效果最差(χ2(3) = 1.151, p = 0.765, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0206,方差解释率为45.9%)。支持MCMDT的起始和细化阶段,但不支持病理扩增阶段。正如预期的那样,活跃用户比被动用户表现出更好的模型拟合,并且Facebook用户在阐述阶段有更明显的口头持久性(VP)激活。与预期相反,Instagram并没有显示出比Facebook更明显的想象预知(IP)激活。这些结果加强了对驱动PSMU的认知和元认知过程的理解,这可能有助于制定有针对性的干预措施。未来的研究应探讨VP和IP如何在不同人群和环境中相互作用并影响欲望思维的MCMDT的后期阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Metacognition, Desire Thinking, and Problematic Social Media Use: Investigating Effects of Active and Passive Engagement in Facebook and Instagram Users.

Metacognition, Desire Thinking, and Problematic Social Media Use: Investigating Effects of Active and Passive Engagement in Facebook and Instagram Users.

Metacognition, Desire Thinking, and Problematic Social Media Use: Investigating Effects of Active and Passive Engagement in Facebook and Instagram Users.

The current study aimed to improve the understanding of cognitive and metacognitive processes underlying problematic social media use (PSMU) by comparing active and passive user engagement and contrasting Facebook and Instagram users. The metacognitive model of desire thinking (MCMDT) was utilized to explore these distinctions within a community sample of 337 participants (64% female, Mage = 36.10). Participants completed self-report measures to assess their metacognitive processes, desire thinking patterns, and social media engagement. The MCMDT demonstrated robust fit across all scenarios, with the most optimal fit for Instagram (χ2(3) = 0.850, p = 0.838, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0062, variance explained 59.4%), and the least optimal fit for passive users (χ2(3) = 1.151, p = 0.765, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.0206, variance explained 45.9%). The initiation and elaboration stages of the MCMDT were supported, but the pathological amplification stage was not. As expected, active users showed better model fit than passive users, and Facebook users had more pronounced verbal perseveration (VP) activation during the elaboration stage. Contrary to expectations, Instagram did not display more pronounced imaginal prefiguration (IP) activation than Facebook. These results enhance understanding of the cognitive and metacognitive processes driving PSMU, which may contribute to developing targeted interventions. Future research should investigate how VP and IP interact with and influence the later stages of the MCMDT of desire thinking across various populations and contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信