安塔利亚省农村19 ~ 60岁人群造血干细胞和骨髓捐献意识及途径评价

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S514701
Alparslan Merdin, Ümit Aydın
{"title":"安塔利亚省农村19 ~ 60岁人群造血干细胞和骨髓捐献意识及途径评价","authors":"Alparslan Merdin, Ümit Aydın","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S514701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is commonly associated with stem cell procedures in public discourse, \"stem cell\" remains a broad classification. More precise terminology such as \"blood stem cell transplantation\", \"bone marrow transplantation\", or \"bone marrow stem cell transplantation\" may better characterize hematopoietic stem cell procedures in both public and academic contexts. This study aimed to evaluate public comprehension of these specific terms and to assess awareness and attitudes toward stem cell donation, with particular focus on rural populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study recruited 250 participants aged 19-60 years from rural Aksu District, Antalya Province. Individuals with a history of stem cell transplantation, those with a first-degree relative with a history of stem cell transplantation, and healthcare professionals were excluded from the study. The participants were asked 11 questions about their approach to stem cell donation and their thoughts on the subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 250 participants, 51.6% (n=129) expressed willingness to become stem cell donors, whereas 48.4% (n=121) reported no willingness to be a donor. Interestingly, 95.6% (n=239) of the participants stated that they would like to know the identity of the person to whom they would be donating stem cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the need to revisit current anonymity regulations in stem cell transplantation, particularly when both donor and recipient express a desire for mutual identification. Updating regulatory protocols and codes to facilitate information exchange in such cases might be better. Moreover, if the recipient may require further donations from the same donor, the donor should be consulted pre-transplantation about their willingness to provide further support. Their preferences should also be considered in the treatment approach when necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1397-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Awareness and Approaches of People Between the Ages of 19-60 in a Rural Area of Antalya Province About Blood Stem Cell Donation and Bone Marrow Donation.\",\"authors\":\"Alparslan Merdin, Ümit Aydın\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S514701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is commonly associated with stem cell procedures in public discourse, \\\"stem cell\\\" remains a broad classification. More precise terminology such as \\\"blood stem cell transplantation\\\", \\\"bone marrow transplantation\\\", or \\\"bone marrow stem cell transplantation\\\" may better characterize hematopoietic stem cell procedures in both public and academic contexts. This study aimed to evaluate public comprehension of these specific terms and to assess awareness and attitudes toward stem cell donation, with particular focus on rural populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study recruited 250 participants aged 19-60 years from rural Aksu District, Antalya Province. Individuals with a history of stem cell transplantation, those with a first-degree relative with a history of stem cell transplantation, and healthcare professionals were excluded from the study. The participants were asked 11 questions about their approach to stem cell donation and their thoughts on the subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 250 participants, 51.6% (n=129) expressed willingness to become stem cell donors, whereas 48.4% (n=121) reported no willingness to be a donor. Interestingly, 95.6% (n=239) of the participants stated that they would like to know the identity of the person to whom they would be donating stem cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the need to revisit current anonymity regulations in stem cell transplantation, particularly when both donor and recipient express a desire for mutual identification. Updating regulatory protocols and codes to facilitate information exchange in such cases might be better. Moreover, if the recipient may require further donations from the same donor, the donor should be consulted pre-transplantation about their willingness to provide further support. Their preferences should also be considered in the treatment approach when necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1397-1405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S514701\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S514701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然造血干细胞移植通常与公共话语中的干细胞手术相关联,但“干细胞”仍然是一个广泛的分类。更精确的术语,如“血液干细胞移植”、“骨髓移植”或“骨髓干细胞移植”可能在公共和学术环境中更好地描述造血干细胞手术。本研究旨在评估公众对这些特定术语的理解,并评估对干细胞捐赠的认识和态度,特别关注农村人口。材料与方法:研究从安塔利亚省阿克苏地区农村招募了250名年龄在19-60岁之间的参与者。有干细胞移植史的个体、有干细胞移植史的一级亲属和医疗保健专业人员被排除在研究之外。参与者被问及11个问题,内容涉及他们对干细胞捐赠的看法。结果:在250名参与者中,51.6% (n=129)表示愿意成为干细胞捐赠者,而48.4% (n=121)表示不愿意成为捐赠者。有趣的是,95.6% (n=239)的参与者表示,他们想知道他们将捐赠干细胞的人的身份。结论:本研究强调有必要重新审视当前干细胞移植的匿名规定,特别是当供体和受体都表达了相互认同的愿望时。在这种情况下,更新监管协议和代码以促进信息交换可能会更好。此外,如果受者可能需要同一供者的进一步捐赠,应在移植前咨询供者是否愿意提供进一步的支持。必要时,在治疗方法中也应考虑他们的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Awareness and Approaches of People Between the Ages of 19-60 in a Rural Area of Antalya Province About Blood Stem Cell Donation and Bone Marrow Donation.

Purpose: While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is commonly associated with stem cell procedures in public discourse, "stem cell" remains a broad classification. More precise terminology such as "blood stem cell transplantation", "bone marrow transplantation", or "bone marrow stem cell transplantation" may better characterize hematopoietic stem cell procedures in both public and academic contexts. This study aimed to evaluate public comprehension of these specific terms and to assess awareness and attitudes toward stem cell donation, with particular focus on rural populations.

Materials and methods: The study recruited 250 participants aged 19-60 years from rural Aksu District, Antalya Province. Individuals with a history of stem cell transplantation, those with a first-degree relative with a history of stem cell transplantation, and healthcare professionals were excluded from the study. The participants were asked 11 questions about their approach to stem cell donation and their thoughts on the subject.

Results: Among the 250 participants, 51.6% (n=129) expressed willingness to become stem cell donors, whereas 48.4% (n=121) reported no willingness to be a donor. Interestingly, 95.6% (n=239) of the participants stated that they would like to know the identity of the person to whom they would be donating stem cells.

Conclusion: This study underscores the need to revisit current anonymity regulations in stem cell transplantation, particularly when both donor and recipient express a desire for mutual identification. Updating regulatory protocols and codes to facilitate information exchange in such cases might be better. Moreover, if the recipient may require further donations from the same donor, the donor should be consulted pre-transplantation about their willingness to provide further support. Their preferences should also be considered in the treatment approach when necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信