{"title":"安塔利亚省农村19 ~ 60岁人群造血干细胞和骨髓捐献意识及途径评价","authors":"Alparslan Merdin, Ümit Aydın","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S514701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is commonly associated with stem cell procedures in public discourse, \"stem cell\" remains a broad classification. More precise terminology such as \"blood stem cell transplantation\", \"bone marrow transplantation\", or \"bone marrow stem cell transplantation\" may better characterize hematopoietic stem cell procedures in both public and academic contexts. This study aimed to evaluate public comprehension of these specific terms and to assess awareness and attitudes toward stem cell donation, with particular focus on rural populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study recruited 250 participants aged 19-60 years from rural Aksu District, Antalya Province. Individuals with a history of stem cell transplantation, those with a first-degree relative with a history of stem cell transplantation, and healthcare professionals were excluded from the study. The participants were asked 11 questions about their approach to stem cell donation and their thoughts on the subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 250 participants, 51.6% (n=129) expressed willingness to become stem cell donors, whereas 48.4% (n=121) reported no willingness to be a donor. Interestingly, 95.6% (n=239) of the participants stated that they would like to know the identity of the person to whom they would be donating stem cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the need to revisit current anonymity regulations in stem cell transplantation, particularly when both donor and recipient express a desire for mutual identification. Updating regulatory protocols and codes to facilitate information exchange in such cases might be better. Moreover, if the recipient may require further donations from the same donor, the donor should be consulted pre-transplantation about their willingness to provide further support. Their preferences should also be considered in the treatment approach when necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1397-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Awareness and Approaches of People Between the Ages of 19-60 in a Rural Area of Antalya Province About Blood Stem Cell Donation and Bone Marrow Donation.\",\"authors\":\"Alparslan Merdin, Ümit Aydın\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S514701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is commonly associated with stem cell procedures in public discourse, \\\"stem cell\\\" remains a broad classification. More precise terminology such as \\\"blood stem cell transplantation\\\", \\\"bone marrow transplantation\\\", or \\\"bone marrow stem cell transplantation\\\" may better characterize hematopoietic stem cell procedures in both public and academic contexts. This study aimed to evaluate public comprehension of these specific terms and to assess awareness and attitudes toward stem cell donation, with particular focus on rural populations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study recruited 250 participants aged 19-60 years from rural Aksu District, Antalya Province. Individuals with a history of stem cell transplantation, those with a first-degree relative with a history of stem cell transplantation, and healthcare professionals were excluded from the study. The participants were asked 11 questions about their approach to stem cell donation and their thoughts on the subject.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 250 participants, 51.6% (n=129) expressed willingness to become stem cell donors, whereas 48.4% (n=121) reported no willingness to be a donor. Interestingly, 95.6% (n=239) of the participants stated that they would like to know the identity of the person to whom they would be donating stem cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the need to revisit current anonymity regulations in stem cell transplantation, particularly when both donor and recipient express a desire for mutual identification. Updating regulatory protocols and codes to facilitate information exchange in such cases might be better. Moreover, if the recipient may require further donations from the same donor, the donor should be consulted pre-transplantation about their willingness to provide further support. Their preferences should also be considered in the treatment approach when necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1397-1405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S514701\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S514701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the Awareness and Approaches of People Between the Ages of 19-60 in a Rural Area of Antalya Province About Blood Stem Cell Donation and Bone Marrow Donation.
Purpose: While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is commonly associated with stem cell procedures in public discourse, "stem cell" remains a broad classification. More precise terminology such as "blood stem cell transplantation", "bone marrow transplantation", or "bone marrow stem cell transplantation" may better characterize hematopoietic stem cell procedures in both public and academic contexts. This study aimed to evaluate public comprehension of these specific terms and to assess awareness and attitudes toward stem cell donation, with particular focus on rural populations.
Materials and methods: The study recruited 250 participants aged 19-60 years from rural Aksu District, Antalya Province. Individuals with a history of stem cell transplantation, those with a first-degree relative with a history of stem cell transplantation, and healthcare professionals were excluded from the study. The participants were asked 11 questions about their approach to stem cell donation and their thoughts on the subject.
Results: Among the 250 participants, 51.6% (n=129) expressed willingness to become stem cell donors, whereas 48.4% (n=121) reported no willingness to be a donor. Interestingly, 95.6% (n=239) of the participants stated that they would like to know the identity of the person to whom they would be donating stem cells.
Conclusion: This study underscores the need to revisit current anonymity regulations in stem cell transplantation, particularly when both donor and recipient express a desire for mutual identification. Updating regulatory protocols and codes to facilitate information exchange in such cases might be better. Moreover, if the recipient may require further donations from the same donor, the donor should be consulted pre-transplantation about their willingness to provide further support. Their preferences should also be considered in the treatment approach when necessary.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.