野火烟雾事件中家长使用空气质量指数的原因:指数知识的预测因素、频繁检查和遵循健康指导。

IF 3.2 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Population and Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w
Catherine E Slavik, Daniel A Chapman, Stephanie E Cleland, Ellen Peters
{"title":"野火烟雾事件中家长使用空气质量指数的原因:指数知识的预测因素、频繁检查和遵循健康指导。","authors":"Catherine E Slavik, Daniel A Chapman, Stephanie E Cleland, Ellen Peters","doi":"10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wildfire smoke poses a serious and growing health threat to communities in the United States (US), Canada, and beyond. Some populations-including children-are especially susceptible. Air Quality Indexes (AQIs) can inform parents about local air quality during smoke events and offer guidance on actions that protect children. In July-August 2023, parents from Oregon, Washington, California, and British Columbia (BC) (<i>n</i> = 2100) participated in an online cross-sectional study. Binary and ordinal logistic regression models were used to examine geographic, demographic, and psychosocial predictors of three dependent variables: knowledge of where to check AQI information, frequent checking of AQI information during wildfire seasons, and adherence to AQI health messages around reducing/rescheduling outdoor physical activity. Smoke-exposure analysis indicated widespread potential exposures to wildfire smoke across all four jurisdictions. Nonetheless, parents in BC, on average, were less likely to report knowing where to check AQI information, checked less frequently, and were less likely to adhere to AQI guidance than parents in the three US states. Adherence to AQI health messages did not differ by jurisdiction in the presence of other covariates, suggesting parents are equally likely to follow AQI guidance when they know where to find it and check it. Other consistent predictors of the three dependent variables included experience with prior smoke-related health impacts, smoke risk perceptions, and use of internet/mobile applications as sources of smoke information. These findings indicate that increased promotion of AQIs may benefit parents in some regions during wildfires. Future evaluations of smoke education initiatives could help health agencies share effective practices across jurisdictions and target interventions to increase AQI adoption.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":47692,"journal":{"name":"Population and Environment","volume":"47 2","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drives parents' use of air quality indexes during wildfire smoke events: predictors of index knowledge, frequent checking, and following health guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine E Slavik, Daniel A Chapman, Stephanie E Cleland, Ellen Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Wildfire smoke poses a serious and growing health threat to communities in the United States (US), Canada, and beyond. Some populations-including children-are especially susceptible. Air Quality Indexes (AQIs) can inform parents about local air quality during smoke events and offer guidance on actions that protect children. In July-August 2023, parents from Oregon, Washington, California, and British Columbia (BC) (<i>n</i> = 2100) participated in an online cross-sectional study. Binary and ordinal logistic regression models were used to examine geographic, demographic, and psychosocial predictors of three dependent variables: knowledge of where to check AQI information, frequent checking of AQI information during wildfire seasons, and adherence to AQI health messages around reducing/rescheduling outdoor physical activity. Smoke-exposure analysis indicated widespread potential exposures to wildfire smoke across all four jurisdictions. Nonetheless, parents in BC, on average, were less likely to report knowing where to check AQI information, checked less frequently, and were less likely to adhere to AQI guidance than parents in the three US states. Adherence to AQI health messages did not differ by jurisdiction in the presence of other covariates, suggesting parents are equally likely to follow AQI guidance when they know where to find it and check it. Other consistent predictors of the three dependent variables included experience with prior smoke-related health impacts, smoke risk perceptions, and use of internet/mobile applications as sources of smoke information. These findings indicate that increased promotion of AQIs may benefit parents in some regions during wildfires. Future evaluations of smoke education initiatives could help health agencies share effective practices across jurisdictions and target interventions to increase AQI adoption.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population and Environment\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野火烟雾对美国、加拿大及其他地区的社区构成了严重且日益严重的健康威胁。一些人群——包括儿童——特别容易受到影响。空气质量指数(aqi)可以让家长了解烟雾事件期间当地的空气质量,并为保护儿童的行动提供指导。2023年7月至8月,来自俄勒冈州、华盛顿州、加利福尼亚州和不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)的父母(n = 2100)参加了一项在线横断面研究。使用二元和有序逻辑回归模型来检验三个因变量的地理、人口统计学和社会心理预测因子:在哪里检查AQI信息的知识,在野火季节频繁检查AQI信息,以及遵守有关减少/重新安排户外体育活动的AQI健康信息。烟雾暴露分析表明,所有四个司法管辖区都存在广泛的野火烟雾潜在暴露。尽管如此,与美国三个州的父母相比,不列颠哥伦比亚省的父母平均不太可能报告知道在哪里检查AQI信息,检查频率更低,并且更不可能坚持AQI指导。在存在其他协变量的情况下,对AQI健康信息的依从性并没有因司法管辖区的不同而不同,这表明当父母知道在哪里可以找到并检查它时,他们同样有可能遵循AQI指导。三个因变量的其他一致预测因素包括以往与吸烟有关的健康影响的经历、吸烟风险认知以及使用互联网/移动应用程序作为烟雾信息来源。这些发现表明,在野火期间,一些地区的父母可能会受益于空气质量指数的提高。未来对吸烟教育倡议的评估可以帮助卫生机构在各个辖区分享有效做法,并有针对性地采取干预措施,以提高空气质量指数的采用。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What drives parents' use of air quality indexes during wildfire smoke events: predictors of index knowledge, frequent checking, and following health guidance.

Wildfire smoke poses a serious and growing health threat to communities in the United States (US), Canada, and beyond. Some populations-including children-are especially susceptible. Air Quality Indexes (AQIs) can inform parents about local air quality during smoke events and offer guidance on actions that protect children. In July-August 2023, parents from Oregon, Washington, California, and British Columbia (BC) (n = 2100) participated in an online cross-sectional study. Binary and ordinal logistic regression models were used to examine geographic, demographic, and psychosocial predictors of three dependent variables: knowledge of where to check AQI information, frequent checking of AQI information during wildfire seasons, and adherence to AQI health messages around reducing/rescheduling outdoor physical activity. Smoke-exposure analysis indicated widespread potential exposures to wildfire smoke across all four jurisdictions. Nonetheless, parents in BC, on average, were less likely to report knowing where to check AQI information, checked less frequently, and were less likely to adhere to AQI guidance than parents in the three US states. Adherence to AQI health messages did not differ by jurisdiction in the presence of other covariates, suggesting parents are equally likely to follow AQI guidance when they know where to find it and check it. Other consistent predictors of the three dependent variables included experience with prior smoke-related health impacts, smoke risk perceptions, and use of internet/mobile applications as sources of smoke information. These findings indicate that increased promotion of AQIs may benefit parents in some regions during wildfires. Future evaluations of smoke education initiatives could help health agencies share effective practices across jurisdictions and target interventions to increase AQI adoption.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Population & Environment is the sole social science journal focused on interdisciplinary research on social demographic aspects of environmental issues. The journal publishes cutting-edge research that contributes new insights on the complex, reciprocal links between human populations and the natural environment in all regions and countries of the world. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods contributions are welcome. Disciplines commonly represented in the journal include demography, geography, sociology, human ecology, environmental economics, public health, anthropology and environmental studies. The journal publishes original research, research brief, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信